To support all students, including students with disabilities, many schools have adopted a positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) framework. Although rigorous research documents the beneficial effects of Tier 1 PBIS for all students and emerging research extends these findings to students with disabilities, there has not been a national U.S. study focused on PBIS and discipline outcomes for students with disabilities. In this exploratory study, we combine existing national data sets to explore the relationship between (a) known PBIS exposure (i.e., being in the PBIS data set) and fidelity (i.e., meeting the criterion on an established fidelity measure of Tier 1 PBIS) and (b) exclusionary discipline for students with disabilities. Using two-part path analysis, we document that PBIS may be associated with decreased use of suspension; however, findings are less consistent for other discipline outcomes. This study highlights the critical need for more accurate data on discipline outcomes and further research on effective intervention.
AlgozzineR. F.BarrettS.EberL.GeorgeH.HornerR. H.LewisT. J.PutnamB.Swain-BradwayJ.MclntoshK.SugaiG. (2014). SWPBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory. OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. http://www.pbis.org
2.
BennerG. J.BeaudoinK. M.ChenP.-Y.DavisC.RalstonN. C. (2010). The impact of intensive positive behavioral supports on the behavioral functioning of students with emotional disturbance: How much does fidelity matter?Journal of Behavior Assessment and Intervention in Children, 1, 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/hb0100361
3.
BoultonA. J.WillifordA. (2018). Analyzing skewed continuous outcomes with many zeros: A tutorial for social work and youth prevention science researchers. Journal of Society for Social Work and Research, 9(4), 721–740. https://doi.org/10.1086/701235
4.
BradshawC. P.KothC. W.ThortonL. A.LeafP. J. (2009). Altering school climate through school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports: Findings from a group-randomized effectiveness trial. Prevention Science, 10, 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-008-0114-9
5.
BradshawC. P.MitchellM. M.LeafP. J. (2010). Examining the effects of schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports on student outcomes: Results from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300709334798
6.
BradshawC. P.WaasdorpT.LeafP. (2012). Effects of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports on child behavior problems. Pediatrics, 130, E1136–E1145.
7.
CamachoK. A.KrezmienM. P. (2019). Individual- and school-level factors contributing to disproportionate suspension rates: A multilevel analysis of one state. Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorders, 27, 209–220. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.uconn.edu/10.1177/1063426618769065
8.
Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. (2020, December). Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Evaluation Blueprint. University of Oregon. www.pbis.org
9.
Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. (2021). Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports [Website]. www.pbis.org
CohenR.KincaidD.ChildsK. E. (2007). Measuring school-wide positive behavior support implementation: Development and validation of the benchmarks of quality. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9, 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007070090040301
12.
FabeloT.ThompsonM. D.PlotkinM.CarmichaelD.MarchbanksM. P.BoothE. A. (2011). Breaking schools’ rules: A statewide study of how school discipline relates to students’ success and juvenile justice involvement. Council of State Governments Justice Center.
13.
FarkasM.SimonsenB.MigdoleS.DonovanM.ClemensK.CiccheseV. (2012). School-wide positive behavior support in an alternative school setting: An evaluation of fidelity, outcomes, and social validity of implementation. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20, 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426610389615
14.
FreemanJ.RobbieK.SimonsenB.BarrettS.GoodmanS. (2021, January). Integrated TFI companion guide. Center on PBIS, University of Oregon. www.pbis.org
15.
FreemanJ.SimonsenB.McCoachD. B.SugaiG.LombardiA.HornerR. H. (2015). An analysis of the relationship between high school dropout rates and implementation of school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports. High School Journal, 98, 290–315. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2015.0009
16.
FreemanJ.SimonsenB.McCoachD. B.SugaiG.LombardiA.HornerR. H. (2016). Implementation effects of school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports on academic, attendance, and behavior outcomes in high schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715580992
17.
GageN. A.Grasley-BoyN.GeorgeH. P.ChildsK.KincaidD. (2019). A quasi-experimental design analysis of the effects of school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports on discipline in Florida. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 21, 50–61.
18.
GageN. A.LeeA.Grasley-BoyN.GeorgeH. P. (2018). The impact of school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports on school suspensions: A statewide quasi-experimental analysis. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300718768204
19.
GageN. A.WhitfordD. K.KatsiyannisA.AdamsS.JasperA. (2019). National analysis of the disciplinary exclusion of Black students with and without disabilities. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 1754–1764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01407-7
20.
Grasley-BoyN. M.GageN. A.LombardoM. (2019). Effect of SWPBIS on disciplinary exclusions for students with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 86, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402919854196
21.
HemezP.BrentJ. J.MowenT. J. (2020). Exploring the school-to-prison pipeline: How school suspensions influence incarceration during young adulthood. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 18, 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204019880945
22.
HornerR. H.SugaiG.SmolkowskiK.EberL.NakasatoJ.ToddA. W.EsperanzaJ. (2009). A randomized, wait-list controlled effectiveness trial assessing school-wide positive behavior support in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300709332067
23.
HornerR. H.ToddA. W.Lewis-PalmerT.IrvinL. K.SugaiG.BolandJ. B. (2004). The School-Wide Evaluation Tool (SET): A research instrument for assessing schoolwide positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 3–12.
24.
KimJ.McIntoshK.MercerS. H.NeseR. N. T. (2018). Longitudinal associations between SWPBIS fidelity of implementation and behavior and academic outcomes. Behavioral Disorders, 43(3), 357–369. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.uconn.edu/10.1177/0198742917747589
25.
KincaidD.ChildsK. E.GeorgeH. (2010). School-wide benchmarks of quality (Revised) [Unpublished instrument]. University of South Florida.
26.
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
27.
LeeA.GageN. A. (2020). Updating and expanding systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the effects of school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports. Psychology in the Schools, 57, 783–804. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22336
28.
LomanS. L.Strickland-CohenM. K.WalkerV. L. (2017). Promoting the accessibility of SWPBIS for students with severe disabilities. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20, 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300717733976
29.
McIntoshK.MassarM. M.AlgozzineR. F.GeorgeH. P.HornerR. H.LewisT. J.Swain-BradwayJ. (2017). Technical adequacy of the SWPBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 19, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300716637193
30.
McIntoshK.MercerS. H.HumeA. E.FrankJ. L.TurriM. G.MathewsS. (2013). Factors related to sustained implementation of schoolwide positive behavior support. Exceptional Children, 79, 293–311.
31.
MercerS. H.McIntoshK.HoseltonR. (2017). Comparability of fidelity measures for assessing tier 1 school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 19, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300717693384
32.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.HillemeierM. M.WangY.MandelZ.DeJarnettC.MaczugaS. (2019). Are students with disabilities suspended more frequently than otherwise similar students without disabilities?Journal of School Psychology, 72, 1–13. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.uconn.edu/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.11.001
National Council on Disability. (2015, June). Breaking the school-to-prison pipeline for students with disabilities. National Council on Disability. https://ncd.gov/publications/2015/06182015
35.
OlsenM. K.SchaferJ. L. (2001). A two-part random-effects model for semicontinuous longitudinal data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96(454), 730–745.
36.
PasE. T.RyooJ. H.MusciR. J.BradshawC. P. (2019). A state-wide quasi-experimental effectiveness study of the scale-up of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports. Journal of School Psychology, 73, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2019.03.001
37.
ShusterB. C.GustafsonJ. R.JenkinsA. B.LloydB. P.CarterE. W.BernsteinC. F. (2017). Including students with disabilities in positive behavioral interventions and supports: Experiences and perspectives of special educators. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 19, 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300716675734
38.
SimonsenB.BrittonL.YoungD. (2010). School-wide positive behavior support in a non-public school setting: A case study. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300708330495
39.
SimonsenB.PutnamR.YaneckK.EvanovichL.ShawS.ShuttletonC.MorrisK.MitchellB. (2020, February). Supporting students with disabilities within a PBIS framework. Center on PBIS, University of Oregon. www.pbis.org
40.
SkibaR. J.ArredondoM. I.WilliamsN. T. (2014). More than a metaphor: The contribution of exclusionary discipline to a school-to-prison pipeline. Equity & Excellence in Education, 47, 546–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2014.958965
41.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2009). Responsiveness-to-intervention and school-wide positive behavior supports: Integration of multi-tiered system approaches. Exceptionality, 17, 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830903235375
42.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2020). Sustaining and scaling positive behavioral interventions and supports: Implementation drivers, outcomes, and considerations. Exceptional Children, 86, 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402919855331
43.
SullivanA. L.Van NormanE. R.KlingbeilD. A. (2014). Exclusionary discipline of students with disabilities: Student and school characteristics predicting suspension. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513519825
44.
University of Oregon. (2019). School-wide information system: Dataset D00970 [Database and Codebook]. University of Oregon.
