Evidence-based practices (EBPs) are strategies shown through rigorous experimentation to be effective when implemented as designed by educators in the field. The purpose of this review is to (a) describe the state and quality of evidence-based reviews and meta-analyses of studies on classroom and behavior management interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBDs) and (b) summarize practices that can be deemed evidence-based. We identified 50 meta-analytic or systematic reviews encompassing 20 interventions implemented solely or in part with students with EBD. In total, our review identified eight interventions classified as EBPs for supporting students labeled with EBD in the meta-analytic literature. Implications for future research are presented.
AlgozzineB. (2017). Toward an acceptable definition of emotional disturbance: Waiting for the change. Behavioral Disorders, 42(3), 136–144. https://doi.org/fp9d
2.
*BakerS. D.LangR.O’ReillyM. (2009). Review of video modeling with students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 32(3), 403–420.
3.
*Bowman-PerrottL.BurkeM. D.de MarinS.ZhangN.DavisH. (2015). A meta-analysis of single-case research on behavior contracts: Effects on behavioral and academic outcomes among children and youth. Behavior Modification, 39(2), 247–269. https://doi.org/f63366
4.
*Bowman-PerrottL.BurkeM. D.ZainiS.ZhangN.VannestK. (2016). Promoting positive behavior using the good behavior game: A meta-analysis of single-case research. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18(3), 180–190. https://doi.org/gnjq
5.
*Bowman-PerrottL.DavisH.VannestK.WilliamsL.GreenwoodC.ParkerR. (2013). Academic benefits of peer tutoring: A meta-analytic review of single-case research. School Psychology Review, 42(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/ghvbz9
6.
*BrieschA. M.BrieschJ. M. (2016). Meta-analysis of behavioral self-management interventions in single-case research. School Psychology Review, 45(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/f97h3v
7.
*BrieschA. M.ChafouleasS. M. (2009). Review and analysis of literature on self-management interventions to promote appropriate classroom behaviors (1988–2008). School Psychology Quarterly, 24(2), 106–118. https://doi.org/ch3fkv
8.
*BruhnA.McDanielS.KreighC. (2015). Self-monitoring interventions for students with behavior problems: A systematic review of current research. Behavioral Disorders, 40(2), 102–121. https://doi.org/f65gvb
9.
BruhnA. L.LaneK. L.HirschS. E. (2014). A review of tier 2 interventions conducted within multitiered models of behavioral prevention. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 22(3), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426613476092
10.
*BruhnA. L.McDanielS. C.FernandoJ.TroughtonL. (2016). Goal-setting interventions for students with behavior problems: A systematic review. Behavioral Disorders, 41(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/f8m5cp
11.
*BusaccaM. L.AndersonA.MooreD. W. (2015). Self-management for primary school students demonstrating problem behavior in regular classrooms: Evidence review of single-case design research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24(4), 373–401. https://doi.org/gnjr
12.
*CarterE. W.LaneK. L.CrnoboriM.BruhnA. L.OakesW. P. (2011). Self-determination interventions for students with and at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders: Mapping the knowledge base. Behavioral Disorders, 36(2), 100–116. https://doi.org/gh2xhd
13.
CohenJ. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/dghsrr
14.
*CommonE. A.BrossL. A.OakesW. P.CantwellE. D.LaneK. L.GermerK. A. (2019). Systematic review of high probability requests in K-12 settings: Examining the evidence base. Behavioral Disorders, 45(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/fqfh
15.
*CommonE. A.LaneK. L.CantwellE. D.BrunstingN. C.OakesW. P.GermerK. A.BrossL. A. (2019). Teacher-delivered strategies to increase students’ opportunities to respond: A systematic methodological review. Behavioral Disorders, 45(2), 67–84. https://doi.org/ggqmvh
16.
*CommonE. A.LaneK. L.PustejovskyJ. E.JohnsonA. H.JohlL. E. (2017). Functional assessment-based interventions for students with or at risk for high-incidence disabilities: Field testing single-case synthesis methods. Remedial and Special Education, 38(6), 331–352. https://doi.org/gdcdrk
CraigheadW. E.NemeroffC. B. (Eds.). (2004). The concise Corsini Encyclopedia of psychology and behavioral science. John Wiley.
19.
*DartE. H.CollinsT. A.KlingbeilD. A.McKinleyL. E. (2014). Peer management interventions: A meta-analytic review of single-case research. School Psychology Review, 43(4), 367–384. https://doi.org/f6tbvf
20.
*DrevonD. D.HixsonM. D.WyseR. D.RigneyA. M. (2019). A meta-analytic review of the evidence for check-in check-out. Psychology in the Schools, 56(3), 393–412. https://doi.org/gnjs
21.
*DunnM. E.ShelnutJ.RyanJ. B.KatsiyannisA. (2017). A systematic review of peer-mediated interventions on the academic achievement of students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 40(4), 497–524. https://doi.org/gch3gf
22.
*EnnisR. P.JolivetteK. (2014). Existing research and future directions for self-regulated strategy development with students with and at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. The Journal of Special Education, 48(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/f565q4
23.
FlowerA.McKennaJ. W.HaringC. D. (2017). Behavior and classroom management: Are teacher preparation programs really preparing our teachers?Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61(2), 163–169. https://doi.org/ggq4jm
24.
FornessS. R.FreemanS. F.PaparellaT.KauffmanJ. M.WalkerH. M. (2012). Special education implications of point and cumulative prevalence for children with emotional or behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/dx2wd4
25.
*GageN. A.LewisT. J.StichterJ. P. (2012). Functional behavioral assessment-based interventions for students with or at risk for emotional and/or behavioral disorders in school: A hierarchical linear modeling meta-analysis. Behavioral Disorders, 37(2), 55–77. https://doi.org/fp9j
26.
GageN. A.ScottT.HirnR.MacSuga-GageA. S. (2018). The relationship between teachers’ implementation of classroom management practices and student behavior in elementary school. Behavioral Disorders, 43(2), 302–315. https://doi.org/ggq4jh
27.
*HawkenL. S.BundockK.KladisK.O’KeeffeB.BarrettC. A. (2014). Systematic review of the check-in, check-out intervention for students at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 37(4), 635–658. https://doi.org/gnjv
28.
*HughesC. A.RuhlK. L.MisraA. (1989). Self-management with behaviorally disordered students in school settings: A promise unfulfilled?Behavioral Disorders, 14(4), 250–262. https://doi.org/gnj2
29.
*HutchinsN. S.BurkeM. D.Bowman-PerrottL.TarlowK. R.HattonH. (2019). The effects of social skills interventions for students with EBD and ASD: A single-case meta-analysis. Behavior Modification, 44(5), 773–704. https://doi.org/gg55wb
30.
*KlingbeilD. A.DartE. H.SchrammA. L. (2019). A systematic review of function-modified check-in/check-out. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 21(2), 77–92. https://doi.org/gnj3
31.
*KnowlesC.MengP.MachalicekW. (2015). Task sequencing for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: A systematic review. Behavior Modification, 39(1), 136–166. https://doi.org/f6z2gq
32.
*LaneK. L.KalbergJ. R.ShepcaroJ. C. (2009). An examination of the evidence base for function-based interventions for students with emotional and/or behavioral disorders attending middle and high schools. Exceptional Children, 75(3), 321–340. https://doi.org/f6z2gq
33.
*LaneK. L.UmbreitJ.Beebe-FrankenbergerM. E. (1999). Functional assessment research on students with or at risk for EBD: 1990 to the present. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/fsf95s
34.
*LeahyL. R. F.MillerF. G.SchardtA. A. (2019). Effects of teacher-directed opportunities to respond on student behavioral outcomes: A quantitative synthesis of single-case design research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 28(1), 78–106. https://doi.org/gnj4
35.
*LeeD. L. (2005). Increasing compliance: A quantitative synthesis of applied research on high-probability request sequences. Exceptionality, 13(3), 141–154. https://doi.org/c4nnd2
36.
LewisT. J. (2016). Does the field of EBD need a distinct set of “intensive” interventions or more systemic intensity within a continuum of social/emotional supports?Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 24(3), 187–190. https://doi.org/gg9jqf
37.
LewisT. J.WehbyJ. H.ScottT. M. (2019). The peacock hill working group “problems and promises” three decades later: Introduction to the creek bend consortium special issue. Behavioral Disorders, 44(2), 67–69. https://doi.org/gnj5
38.
LloydB. P.BruhnA. L.SutherlandK. S.BradshawC. P. (2019). Progress and priorities in research to improve outcomes for students with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 44(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/ghw3ck
39.
*LloydB. P.WeaverE. S.StaubitzJ. L. (2016). A review of functional analysis methods conducted in public school classroom settings. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25(3), 324–356. https://doi.org/gh868v
40.
LosinskiM.SandersS.KatsiyannisA.WisemanN. (2017). A meta-analysis of interventions to improve the compliance of students with disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 40(4), 435–463. https://doi.org/gnj6
41.
*LosinskiM.WisemanN.WhiteS. A.BalluchF. (2016). A meta-analysis of video-modeling based interventions for reduction of challenging behaviors for students with EBD. The Journal of Special Education, 49(4), 243–252. https://doi.org/f749p4
42.
*MacSuga-GageA. S.SimonsenB. (2015). Examining the effects of teacher-directed opportunities to respond on student outcomes: A systematic review of the literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 38(2), 211–239.
43.
*MagginD. M.BrieschA. M.ChafouleasS. M. (2013). An application of the what works clearinghouse standards for evaluating single-subject research: Synthesis of the self-management literature base. Remedial and Special Education, 34(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/f4vt5n
44.
*MagginD. M.ChafouleasS. M.GoddardK. M.JohnsonA. H. (2011). A systematic evaluation of token economies as a classroom management tool for students with challenging behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 49(5), 529–554. https://doi.org/bm7v2n
45.
*MagginD. M.JohnsonA. H.ChafouleasS. M.RubertoL. M.BerggrenM. (2012). A systematic evidence review of school-based group contingency interventions for students with challenging behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 50(5), 625–654. https://doi.org/gcmc73
46.
MagginD. M.LaneK. L.PustejovskyJ. E. (2017). Introduction to the special issue on single-case systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Remedial and Special Education, 38(6), 323–330. https://doi.org/ggxtnc
47.
*MagginD. M.PustejovskyJ. E.JohnsonA. H. (2017). A meta-analysis of school-based group contingency interventions for students with challenging behavior: An update. Remedial and Special Education, 38(6), 353–370. https://doi.org/gcmjkm
48.
MagginD. M.TalbottE.Van AckerE. Y.KummS. (2017). Quality indicators for systematic reviews in behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 42(2), 52–64. https://doi.org/gkqj
49.
*MagginD. M.ZurheideJ.PickettK. C.BaillieS. J. (2015). A systematic evidence review of the check-in/check-out program for reducing student challenging behaviors. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17(4), 197–208. https://doi.org/f7ptz5
50.
*MathurS. R.KavaleK. A.QuinnM. M.FornessS. R.RutherfordR. B.Jr. (1998). Social skills interventions with students with emotional and behavioral problems: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Behavioral Disorders, 23(3), 193–201. https://doi.org/gfzc64
51.
MillerR. L.BrewerJ. D. (Eds.). (2003). The AZ of social research: A dictionary of key social science research concepts. SAGE.
52.
MitchellB. S.KernL.ConroyM. A. (2019). Supporting students with emotional or behavioral disorders: State of the field. Behavioral Disorders, 44(2), 70–84. https://doi.org/fh9v
53.
MoeyaertM.ZimmermanK. N.LedfordJ. R. (2018). Synthesis and meta-analysis of single case research. In LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.), Single case research methodology (pp. 393–416). Routledge.
54.
*MooreT. C.MagginD. M.ThompsonK. M.GordonJ. R.DanielsS.LangL. E. (2019). Evidence review for teacher praise to improve students’ classroom behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 21(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/gh5285
55.
*NelsonJ. R.SmithD. J.YoungR. K.DoddJ. M. (1991). A review of self-management outcome research conducted with students who exhibit behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 16(3), 169–179. https://doi.org/gh2wpk
56.
*RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.CantwellE. D.MessengerM. L. (2017). A systematic review of the evidence base for instructional choice in K–12 settings. Behavioral Disorders, 42(3), 89–107. https://doi.org/fqfg
57.
*RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.DunlapK. D.EnnisR. P. (2018). A systematic review of teacher-delivered behavior-specific praise on K–12 student performance. Remedial and Special Education, 40(2), 112–128. https://doi.org/frg9
58.
*SchlossP. J.SchlossC. N.WoodC. E.KiehlW. S. (1986). A critical review of social skills research with behaviorally disordered students. Behavioral Disorders, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/gnj8
59.
*SeokS.DaCostaB.McHenry-PowellM.Heitzman-PowellL.OstmeyerK. (2018). A systematic review of evidence-based video modeling for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Education Sciences, 8(4), Article 170. https://doi.org/gnj9
60.
ShadishW. R.HedgesL. V.HornerR. H.OdomS. L. (2015). The role of between-case effect size in conducting, interpreting, and summarizing single-case research. NCER 2015-002. National Center for Education Research.
61.
*ShogrenK. A.Faggella-LubyM. N.BaeS. J.WehmeyerM. L. (2004). The effect of choice-making as an intervention for problem behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6(4), 228–237. https://doi.org/dbc86f
62.
SmithM. L.GlassG. V. (1977). Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist, 32(9), 752–760. https://doi.org/dmx4s8
63.
*SoaresD. A.HarrisonJ. R.VannestK. J.McClellandS. S. (2016). Effect size for token economy use in contemporary classroom settings: A meta-analysis of single-case research. School Psychology Review, 45(4), 379–399. https://doi.org/gjvp2p
64.
SpencerT. D.DetrichR.SlocumT. A. (2012). Evidence-based practice: A framework for making effective decisions. Education and Treatment of Children, 35(2), 127–151. https://doi.org/ghxmd7
65.
*SutherlandK. S.WehbyJ. H.GunterP. L. (2000). The effectiveness of cooperative learning with students with emotional and behavioral disorders: A literature review. Behavioral Disorders, 25(3), 225–238. https://doi.org/gh2wsb
66.
TalbottE.MagginD. M.Van AckerE. Y.KummS. (2018). Quality indicators for reviews of research in special education. Exceptionality, 26(4), 245–265. https://doi.org/gftjmr
67.
VannestK. J.PeltierC.HaasA. (2018). Results reporting in single case experiments and single case meta-analysis. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 79, 10–18. https://doi.org/gdz6k2
68.
*VegasK. C.JensonW. R.KircherJ. C. (2007). A single-subject meta-analysis of the effectiveness of time-out in reducing disruptive classroom behavior. Behavioral Disorders, 32(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/gh2w6c
69.
*WattsG. W.BryantD. P.CarrollM. L. (2019). Students with emotional–behavioral disorders as cross-age tutors: A synthesis of the literature. Behavioral Disorders, 44(3), 131–147. https://doi.org/gh2xf3
70.
*WolfeK.PyleD.CharltonC. T.SabeyC. V.LundE. M.RossS. W. (2016). A systematic review of the empirical support for check-in check-out. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18(2), 74–88. https://doi.org/f8c6fn
71.
*WoodB. K.OakesW. P.FettigA.LaneK. L. (2015). A review of the evidence base of functional assessment-based interventions for young students using one systematic approach. Behavioral Disorders, 40(4), 230–250. https://doi.org/gdz3h2
72.
ZaheerI.MagginD.McDanielS.McIntoshK.RodriguezB. J.FogtJ. B. (2019). Implementation of promising practices that support students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 44(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/fjb8
73.
*ZaragozaN.VaughnS.McintoshR. (1991). Social skills interventions and children with behavior problems: A review. Behavioral Disorders, 16(4), 260–275. https://doi.org/gh2wpf
74.
ZimmermanK. N.LedfordJ. R.SeveriniK. E.PustejovskyJ. E.BartonE. E.LloydB. P. (2018). Single-case synthesis tools I: Comparing tools to evaluate SCD quality and rigor. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 79, 19–32. https://doi.org/gdvnq2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
