Students with emotional/behavioral disorders are increasingly included in general education settings, requiring their special educators to coordinate with other educators. Yet, research provides limited insights into their interactions with other educators. Thus, we qualitatively examined how special educators experienced and navigated interactions with other educators when serving students with emotional/behavioral disabilities in self-contained classes that were actively moving students into more inclusive placements. Participants emphasized that their work was interdependent with others; they relied on others for work essential to meeting students’ needs. They shared that interactions were shaped by conceptions of students’ needs, the division of responsibilities, and resources. They experienced interactions on a continuum from alignment to misalignment; when experiencing alignment, they felt supported to meet student needs, whereas they felt misalignment challenged those efforts. Participants described using varied strategies to promote alignment. Results have implications for coordinating teachers’ efforts to serve students with emotional/behavioral disabilities.
BettiniE.CrockettJ.BrownellM. T.MerrillK. (2016). Relationships between working conditions and special educators’ instruction. Journal of Special Education, 50, 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466916644425
2.
BettiniE.CummingM.MerrillK. L.BrunstingN.LiaupsinC. J. (2017). Working conditions in self-contained settings for students with emotional disturbance. Journal of Special Education, 51, 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466916674195
3.
BettiniE.Morris-MathewsH.LillisJ.MeyerK.ShaheenT.KalerL.BrunstingN. C. (In press). Special educators’ roles in inclusive schools. In: McLeskeyJ.SpoonerF.AlgozzineB.WaldronN. L. (Eds.), Handbook of effective, inclusive elementary schools: Research and practice.
4.
BettiniE.WangJ.CummingM.KimerlingJ.SchutzS. (2019). Special educators’ experiences of roles and responsibilities in self-contained classes for students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518762470
5.
BillingsleyB.McLeskeyJ.CrockettJ. (2017). Principal leadership: Moving toward inclusive and high-achieving schools for students with disabilities (IC-8). Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center, University of Florida.
6.
BillingsleyB. S.FallA. M.WilliamsT. O. (2006). Who is teaching students with emotional and behavioral disorders? A profile and comparison to other special educators. Behavioral Disorders, 31, 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290603100301
7.
BrownellM. T.SindelarP. T.KielyM. T.DanielsonL. C. (2010). Special education teacher quality and preparation: Exposing foundations and constructing a new model. Exceptional Children, 76, 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007600307
8.
BrykA.SchneiderB. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Russell Sage Foundation.
CharmazK. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE.
11.
FarmerT. W.SutherlandK. S.TalbottE.BrooksD. S.NorwalkK.HunekeM. (2016). Special educators as intervention specialists: Dynamic systems and the complexity of intensifying intervention for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 24(3), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426616650166.
12.
GarwoodJ. D.WertsM. G.VargheseC.GoseyL. (2018). Mixed-methods analysis of rural special educators’ role stressors, behavior management, and burnout. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 37, 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870517745270
13.
GilmourA.WehbyJ. (2020). The association between teaching students with disabilities and teacher turnover. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112, 1042–1060.
14.
GinnsD. S.BegenyJ. C. (2019). Effects of performance feedback on treatment integrity of a class-wide level system for secondary students with emotional disturbance. Behavioral Disorders, 44, 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742918795884
15.
Gomez-NajarroJ. (2020). An empty seat at the table: Examining general and special education teacher collaboration in response to intervention. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419850894
16.
GreenJ.McLaughlinK.AlegriaM.BettiniE.GruberM.HoagwoodK.Le TaiL.SampsonN.ZaslavskyA. M.XuanZ.KesslerR. (2020). Associations of sociodemographic factors and psychiatric disorders with type of school-based mental health services received by youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 67, 392–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.02.016
17.
GriffinC. C.KilgoreK. L.WinnJ. A.Otis-WilbornA. (2008). First-year special education teachers’ relationships with their general education colleagues. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35, 141–157.
18.
JacksonK.WillisK.GilesL.LastrapesR. E.MooneyP. (2017). How to meaningfully incorporate co-teaching into programs for middle school students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Beyond Behavior, 26(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295617694408
KlingnerJ. K.VaughnS. (2002). The changing roles and responsibilities of an LD specialist. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511188
21.
LiL.RupparA. (2021). Conceptualizing teacher agency for inclusive education: A systematic and international review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 44, 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406420926976
22.
LortieD. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. University of Chicago Press.
23.
McLeskeyJ.WaldronN.ReddL. (2014). A case study of a highly effective, inclusive elementary school. Journal of Special Education, 48, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466912440455
24.
NgT.FeldmanD. (2012). Employee voice behavior: A meta-analytic test of conservation of resources framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 216–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.754
25.
O’BrienK.BrunstingN. C.BettiniE.CummingM. M.RagunathanM.SuttonR. (2019). Special educators’ working conditions in self-contained settings for students with emotional or behavioral disorders: A descriptive analysis. Exceptional Children, 86, 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402919868946
26.
Office of Special Education Programs. (2018). 39th Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. www.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/index.html
27.
Otis-WilbornA.WinnJ.GriffinC.KilgoreK. (2005). Beginning special educators’ forays into general education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 28, 143–152.
28.
PrattS. (2014). Achieving symbiosis: Working through challenges found in co-teaching to achieve effective co-teaching relationships. Teaching and Teacher Education, 41, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.02.006
29.
RupparA. L.RobertsC. A.OlsonA. J. (2017). Perceptions about expert teaching for students with severe disabilities among teachers identified as experts. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 42(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796917697311
30.
RussellJ. L.BrayL. E. (2016). Crafting coherence from complex policy messages: Educators’ perceptions of special education and standards-based accountability policies. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21(12), 1–25. http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1044
31.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.McDuffieK. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73(4), 392–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290707300401
32.
StelitanoL.JohnstonW. R.YoungC. J. (2020). Principals could use more support to help students with disabilities—Especially in schools serving mostly students of color. American Educator Report, RAND Corporation. www.rand.org
WilliamsonP.HoppeyD.McLeskeyJ.BergmannE.MooreH. (2019). Trends in LRE placement rates over the past 25 years. Journal of Special Education, 53, 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466919855052
35.
WoodsonA. N.PabonA. (2016). “I’m none of the above”: Exploring themes of heteropatriarchy in the life histories of Black male educators. Equity and Excellence in Education, 49, 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2015.1121456
36.
YoungsP.FrankK.ThumY.LowM. (2012). The motivation of teachers to produce human capital and conform to their social contexts. In SmithT.DesimoneL.PorterA. (Eds.), Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education: Organization and effectiveness of induction programs for new teachers (Vol. 110, pp. 248–272). Blackwell.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
