Paraprofessionals are an essential part of special education. School districts increasingly rely on paraprofessional support to meet students’ needs, but formal professional development opportunities vary. A lack of training in effective instructional strategies is potentially problematic for the efficacy of support staff. A multiple-baseline across participants single-case research design examined the effects of a manualized teacher-to-paraprofessional coaching intervention to increase the rate of behavior-specific praise by paraprofessionals. Participant dyads (paraprofessionals and special education teachers) taught in a rural public elementary school serving third- through fifth-grade students. The collaborative multicomponent training program included self-monitoring, performance feedback, goal setting, modeling, and action planning. Analyses encompassed primary author visual analysis, masked visual analysis by three independent raters, and nonparametric statistical analysis. The intervention resulted in increased use of behavior-specific praise across all four paraprofessionals and participants indicated good social validity. Discussions include implications for future research and practice.
AlldayR. A.Hinkson-LeeK.HudsonT.Neilsen-GattiS.KleinkeA.RusselC. S. (2012). Training general educators to increase behavior-specific praise: Effects on students with EBD. Behavioral Disorders, 37(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/ghtvn3
2.
BrockM. E.BarczakM. A.DuekerS. A. (2020). Effects of delayed video-based feedback and observing feedback on paraprofessional implementation of evidence-based practices for students with severe disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 35(3), 153–164. https://doi.org/ggqmzj
3.
BrockM. E.CarterE. W. (2013). A systematic review of paraprofessional-deliverededucational practices to improve outcomes for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 38(4), 211–221. https://doi.org/fwn4
4.
BrockM. E.CarterE. W. (2015). Effects of a professional development package to prepare special education paraprofessionals to implement evidence-based practice. The Journal of Special Education, 49(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/f7bvzg
5.
BrockM. E.CarterE. W. (2016). Efficacy of teachers training paraprofessionals to implement peer support arrangements. Exceptional Children, 82(3), 354–371. https://doi.org/f8ggbz
6.
ByunT. M.HitchcockE. R.FerronJ. (2017). Masked visual analysis: Minimizing type I error in visually guided single-case design for communication disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(6), 1455–1466. https://doi.org/gbrx6v
7.
CarterE.O’RourkeL.SiscoL. G.PelsueD. (2009). Knowledge, responsibilities, and training needs of paraprofessionals in elementary and secondary schools. Remedial and Special Education, 30(6), 344–359. https://doi.org/b4893n
CookB. G.CookL. (2016). Leveraging evidence-based practice through partnerships based on practice-based evidence. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 14(2), 143–157.
10.
DouglasS. N.ChapinS. E.NolanJ. F. (2016). Special education teachers’ experiences supporting and supervising paraeducators: Implications for special and general education settings. Teacher Education and Special Education, 39(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/gf86tz
11.
DowningJ. E.RyndakD. L.ClarkD. (2000). Paraeducators in inclusive classrooms: Their own perceptions. Remedial and Special Education, 21(3), 171–181. https://doi.org/bcjzt4
12.
EnnisR. P.RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.DunlapK. D. (2020a). Behavior-specific praise in pre-k-12 settings: Mapping the 50-year knowledge base. Behavioral Disorders, 45(3), 131–147. https://doi.org/gh2xfs
13.
EnnisR. P.RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.DunlapK. D. (2020b). The impact of coaching on teacher-delivered behavior-specific praise in pre-K–12 settings: A systematic review. Behavioral Disorders, 45(3), 148–166. https://doi.org/ghfjrv
14.
EnnisR. P.RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.OakesW. P.SchellmanL. E. (2018). Behavior-specific praise: An effective, efficient, low-intensity strategy to support student success. Beyond Behavior, 27(3), 134–139. https://doi.org/gfz3sm
15.
EptonT.CurrieS.ArmitageC. J. (2017). Unique effects of setting goals on behavior change: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(12), 1182–1198. https://doi.org/gcng7c
16.
FallonL. M.Collier-MeekM. A.MagginD. M.SanettiL. M.JohnsonA. H. (2015). Is performance feedback for educators an evidence-based practice? A systematic review and evaluation based on single-case research. Exceptional Children, 81(2), 227–246. https://doi.org/ggx68z
17.
Fink ChorzempaB.SmithM. D.SileoJ. M. (2018). Practice-based evidence: A model for helping educators make evidence-based decisions. Teacher Education and Special Education, 42(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/fwn5
18.
GiangrecoM. F.SuterJ. C.DoyleM. B. (2010). Paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: A review of recent research. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/cqjpts
19.
GregoriE.RispoliM. J.LoryC.KimS. Y.DavidM. (2021). Effects of teachers as coaches for paraprofessionals implementing functional communication training. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/fvpz
20.
HattieJ.TimperleyH. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/bf4d36
21.
HollingsheadA.KroegerS. D.AltusJ.TryttenJ. B. (2016). A case study of positive behavior supports-based interventions in a seventh-grade urban classroom. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 60(4), 278–285. https://doi.org/fvnv
22.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
23.
KazdinA. E. (1979). Unobtrusive measures in behavioral assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12(4), 713–724. https://doi.org/fbgsrw
24.
KimS.KoegelR. L.KoegelL. K. (2017). Training paraprofessionals to target socialization in students with ASD: Fidelity of implementation and social validity. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 19(2), 102–114. https://doi.org/ggxh5d
LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (2018). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. Routledge.
27.
LedfordJ. R.ZimmermanK. N.HarbinE. R.WardS. E. (2018). Improving the use of evidence-based instructional practices for paraprofessionals. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 33(4), 206–216. https://doi.org/fsdc
28.
MagginD. M.BrieschA. M.ChafouleasS. M. (2013). An application of the What Works Clearinghouse standards for evaluating single-subject research: Synthesis of the self-management literature base. Remedial and Special Education, 34(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/f4vt5n
29.
MasonR. A.GunerselA. B.IrvinD. W.WillsH. P.GregoriE.AnZ. G.IngramP. B. (2021). From the frontlines: Perceptions of paraprofessionals’ roles and responsibilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 44(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/fwn6
30.
MasonR. A.WillsH. P.IrvinD.JiaF.KampsD. M. (2020). Ecobehavioral assessmentof paraeducator behaviors that support engagement of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 86(4), 413–429. https://doi.org/ggqmqz
31.
MyersD. M.SimonsenB.SugaiG. (2011). Increasing teachers’ use of praise with a response-to-intervention approach. Education and Treatment of Children, 34(1), 35–39. https://doi.org/fdt448
32.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2018). Characteristics of public school teachers who completed alternative route to certification programs. Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_tlc.asp
33.
O’KeeffeB. V.SlocumT. A.MagnussonR. (2013). The effects of a fluency training package on paraprofessionals’ presentation of a reading intervention. The Journal of Special Education, 47(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/bcw2nw
34.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.DavisJ. L.SauberS. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-u. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/fxcftr
35.
RevickiD. A.FrankL. (1999). Pharmacoeconomic evaluation in the real world: Effectiveness versus efficacy studies. Pharmacoeconomics, 15(5), 423–434. https://doi.org/b7pwnw
36.
RispoliM.NeelyL.LangR.GanzJ. (2011). Training paraprofessionals to implement interventions for people autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 14(6), 378–388. https://doi.org/d5sm4q
37.
RispoliM.SainiS.MasonR.BrodheadM.BurkeM. D.GregoriE. (2017). A systematic review of teacher self-monitoring on implementation of behavioral practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 58–72. https://doi.org/f93pw8
38.
RobinsonS. E. (2011). Teaching paraprofessionals of students with autism to implement pivotal response treatment in inclusive school settings using a brief video feedback training package. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 26(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/fjbhtv
39.
RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.DunlapK. D.EnnisR. P. (2019). A systematic review of teacher-delivered behavior-specific praise on K–12 student performance. Remedial and Special Education, 40(2), 112–128. https://doi.org/frg9
40.
SalleseM. R.VannestK. J. (2020). The effects of a multicomponent self-monitoring intervention on the rates of pre-service teacher behavior-specific praise in a masked single-case experimental design. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 22(4), 207–219. https://doi.org/fwnj
41.
ScheelerM. C.MoranoS.LeeD. L. (2018). Effects of immediate feedback using bug-in-ear with paraeducators working with students with autism. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/gg7w9s
42.
ScheelerM. C.RuhlK. L.McAfeeJ. K. (2004). Providing performance feedback to teachers: A review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(4), 396–407. https://doi.org/d67r8d
43.
Seaman-TullisR. L.Cannella-MaloneH. I.BrockM. E. (2019). Training a paraprofessional to implement video prompting with error correction to teach a vocational skill. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 34(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/gh3x79
44.
SimonsenB.MacSugaA. S.FallonL. M.SugaiG. (2013). The effects of self-monitoringon teachers’ use of specific praise. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 15(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/f4gqw7
45.
SingalA. G.HigginsP. D.WaljeeA. K. (2014). A primer on effectiveness and efficacy trials. Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology, 5(1), Article e45. https://doi.org/gdwtnc
46.
SleimanA. A.SigurjonsdottirS.ElnesA.GageN. A.GravinaN. E. (2020). A quantitative review of performance feedback in organizational settings (1998–2018). Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 40(3–4), 303–332. https://doi.org/ghrsqx
47.
SmithG. J.SchmidtM. M.Edelen-SmithP. J.CookB. G. (2013). Pasteur’s quadrant as the bridge linking rigor with relevance. Exceptional Children, 79(3), 147–161. https://doi.org/f4kbbh
48.
SobeckE. E.DouglasS. N.ChopraR.MoranoS. (2021). Paraeducator supervision in pre-service teacher preparation programs: Results of a national survey. Psychology in the Schools, 58(4), 669–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22383
49.
SobeckE. E.RobertsonR.SmithJ. (2020). The effects of didactic instruction and performance feedback on paraeducator implementation of behavior support strategies in inclusive settings. The Journal of Special Education, 53(4), 245–255. https://doi.org/fwn7
50.
SolomonB. G.KleinS. A.PolityloB. C. (2012). The effect of performance feedback on teachers’ treatment integrity: A meta-analysis of the single-case literature. School Psychology Review, 41(2), 160–175. https://doi.org/ghk59s
51.
SutherlandK. S.WehbyJ. H.CopelandS. R. (2000). Effect of varying rates of behavior-specific praise on the on-task behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8(1), 2–8. https://doi.org/bc9cpt
52.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2017). Occupational outlook handbook: Teacher assistants.
53.
U.S. Department of Education. (2020). 41st annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2019. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
54.
VannestK. J.PeltierC.HaasA. (2018). Results reporting in single case experiments and single case meta-analysis. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 79, 10–18. https://doi.org/gdz6k2
WalkerV. L.CarpenterM. E.LyonK. J.ButtonL. (2021). A meta-analysis of paraprofessional-delivered interventions to address challenging behavior among students with disabilities. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 23(2), 68–80. https://doi.org/fwn9
57.
WalkerV. L.DouglasK. H.BrewerC. (2020). Teacher-delivered training to promote paraprofessional implementation of systematic instruction. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(3), 257–274. https://doi.org/fwpb
58.
WalkerV. L.SmithC. G. (2015). Training paraprofessionals to support students with disabilities: A literature review. Exceptionality, 23(3), 170–191. https://doi.org/fsdd
59.
WalkerV. L.SnellM. E. (2017). Teaching paraprofessionals to implement function-based interventions. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/gbgkdp
60.
WallaceT.ShinJ.BartholomayT.StahlB. J. (2001). Knowledge and skills for teachers supervising the work of paraprofessionals. Exceptional Children, 67(4), 520–533. https://doi.org/fwn8
61.
WermerL.BrockM. E.SeamanR. L. (2018). Efficacy of a teacher training a paraprofessional to promote communication for a student with autism and complex communication needs. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 33(4), 217–226. https://doi.org/gg7wnt
WilliamsonP.HoppeyD.McLeskeyJ.BergmannE.MooreH. (2020). Trends in LRE placement rates over the past 25 years. The Journal of Special Education, 53(4), 236–244. https://doi.org/ggqmr6
64.
WillsH. P.MasonR.GregoriE.VeatchM. (2019). Effects of self-monitoring on the praise rates of paraprofessionals for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. The Elementary School Journal, 119(4), 562–579. https://doi.org/fvhc
65.
WoleryM.BusickM.ReichowB.BartonE. E. (2010). Comparison of overlap methods for quantitatively synthesizing single-subject data. The Journal of Special Education, 44(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/d6ddq5
66.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/fj4vkr
67.
Zoder-MartellK. A.FloressM. T.BernasR. S.DufreneB. A.FoulksS. L. (2019). Training teachers to increase behavior-specific praise: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 35(4), 309–338. https://doi.org/ggnsc3
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
