Some elementary students may exhibit challenging externalizing or internalizing behaviors in addition to difficulty with mathematics. In this study, we explored the behavioral patterns of 441 third-grade students with and without mathematics difficulty (MD). Compared with students without MD, students with MD demonstrated higher rates of externalizing and internalizing behaviors. We then randomly assigned 162 third-grade students with MD to receive a 10-week word-problem intervention or to be in a business-as-usual comparison group. Within the word-problem intervention, students with MD who exhibited higher occurrences of externalizing behaviors performed significantly lower on a word-problem measure than students without as many occurrences of externalizing behaviors. Response to the word-problem intervention did not differ based on internalizing behavior patterns.
AlterP. (2012). Helping students with emotional and behavioral disorders solve mathematics word problems. Preventing School Failure, 56, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2011.565283
2.
AlterP.BrownE. T.PyleJ. (2011). A strategy-based intervention to improve math word problem-solving skills of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 34, 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1353.2011.0028
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
4.
BlackorbyJ.WagnerM.CametoR.DaviesE.LevineP.NewmanL.. . . SumiC. (2004). Engagement, academics, social adjustment, and independence: The achievements of elementary and middle school students with disabilities. SRI International.
5.
BullisM.YovanoffP. (2006). Community employment experiences of formerly incarcerated youth. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266060140020401
6.
DevineA.HillF.CareyE.SzücsD. (2018). Cognitive and emotional math problems largely dissociate: Prevalence of developmental dyscalculia and mathematics anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110, 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000222
7.
DrummondT. (1994). The Student Risk Screening Scale- Internalizing and Externalizing (SRSS-IE). www.CI3T.org
8.
EnnisR. P.LaneK. L.OakesW. P. (2012). Score reliability and validity of the Student Risk Screening Scale: A psychometrically sound, feasible tool for use in urban elementary schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20, 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426611400082
9.
EpsteinM. H.NelsonJ. R.TroutA. L.MooneyP. (2005). Achievement and emotional disturbance: Academic status and intervention research. In EpsteinM. H.KutashK.DuchnowskiA. J. (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders and their families: Programs and evaluation practices (2nd ed., pp. 451–477). Pro-Ed.
10.
FornessS. R.FreemanS. F. N.PaparellaT.KauffmanJ. M.WalkerH. M. (2012). Special education implications of point and cumulative prevalence for children with emotional or behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20, 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426611401624
FuchsL. S.PowellS. R.CirinoP. T.SchumacherR. F.MarrinS.HamlettC. L.. . . ChangasP. C. (2014). Does calculation or word-problem instruction provide a stronger route to pre-algebraic knowledge?Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 990–1006. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036793
13.
FuchsL. S.PowellS. R.SeethalerP. M.CirinoP. T.FletcherJ. M.FuchsD.HamlettC. L. (2010). The effects of strategic counting instruction, with and without deliberate practice, on number combination skill among students with mathematics difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.09.003
14.
FuchsL. S.SeethalerP. M.PowellS. R.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.FletcherJ. M. (2008). Effects of preventative tutoring on the mathematical problem solving of third-grade students with math and reading difficulties. Exceptional Children, 74, 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400202
HodgeJ.RiccominiP. J.BufordR.HerbstM. (2006). A review of instructional interventions in mathematics for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 31, 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290603100304
17.
JitendraA. K.HarwellM. R.DupuisD. N.KarlS. R. (2017). A randomized trial of the effects of schema-based instruction on proportional problem-solving for students with mathematics problem-solving difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50, 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416629646
18.
JitendraA. K.RodriguezM.KaniveR.HuangJ.-P.ChurchC.CorroyK. A.ZaslofskyA. (2013). Impact of small-group tutoring interventions on the mathematical problem solving and achievement of third-grade students with mathematics difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36, 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948712457561
19.
JitendraA. K.StarJ.StarostaK.LehJ.SoodS.CaskieC.HughesC.MackT. (2009). Improving seventh grade students’ learning of ratio and proportion: The role of schema-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.06.001
20.
JordanN. C.HanichL. B. (2000). Mathematical thinking in second-grade children with different forms of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300605
21.
LaneK. L. (2004). Academic instruction and tutoring interventions for students with emotional/behavioral disorders: 1990 to present. In RutherfordR. B.QuinnM. M.MathurS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 462–486). Guilford Press.
22.
LaneK. L.Barton-ArwoodS. M.NelsonJ. R.WehbyJ. (2008). Academic performance of students with emotional and behavioral disorders served in a self-contained setting. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-007-9050-1
23.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.OakesW. P.LambertW.CoxM. L.HankinsK. E. (2012). A validation of the Student Risk Screening Scale for internalizing and externalizing behaviors: Patterns in rural and urban elementary schools. Behavioral Disorders, 37, 244–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291203700405
24.
LaneK. L.OakesW. P.HarrisP. J.MenziesH. M.CoxM. L.LambertW. (2012). Initial evidence for the reliability and validity of the Student Risk Screening Scale for internalizing and externalizing behaviors at the elementary level. Behavioral Disorders, 37, 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291203700204
25.
LaneK. L.Richards-TutorC.OakesW. P.ConnorK. (2014). Initial evidence for the reliability and validity of the student risk screening scale with elementary age English learners. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39, 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508413496836
26.
LosinskiM.EnnisR. P.SandersS. A.NelsonJ. (2019). Examining the evidence-base of mathematical interventions for students with emotional disturbances: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 52, 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918796200
27.
MagginD. M.WehbyJ. H.FarmerT. W.BrooksD. S. (2016). Intensive interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 24(3), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426616661498
28.
MattsonB.ForlenzaV. C.HamiltonS.CohenC. (2015). Summary of school and district strategies for transient/mobile students: Prepared for Pennsylvania Department of Education academic recovery liaisons [A report from the Mid-Atlantic Comprehensive Center at WestEd]. WestEd.
29.
MazzoccoM. M. M. (2007). Defining and differentiating mathematical learning disabilities and difficulties. In BerchD. B.MazzoccoM. M. M. (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 29–48). Paul H. Brookes.
30.
MenziesH.LaneK. L. (2012). Validity of the Student Risk Screening Scale: Evidence of predictive validity in a diverse, suburban elementary setting. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426610389613
31.
MooneyP.EpsteinM. H.ReidR.NelsonJ. R. (2003). Status of and trends in academic intervention research for students with emotional disturbance. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 272–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325030240050301
32.
MulcahyC. A.KrezmienM. P. (2009). Effects of a contextualized instructional package on the mathematics performance of secondary students with EBD. Behavioral Disorders, 34, 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515579275
33.
MulcahyC. A.KrezmienM. P.TraversJ. (2016). Improving mathematics performance among secondary students with EBD: A methodological review. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515579275
34.
National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2016). How to intensify academic interventions. National Center on Intensive Intervention, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
35.
NelsonJ. R.BennerG. J.LaneK.SmithB. W. (2004). Academic achievement of K-12 students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptional Children, 71, 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290407100104
36.
OakesW. P.WilderK.LaneK. L.PowersL.YokoyamaL.O’HareM. E.JenkinsA. B. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Student Risk Screening Scale: An effective tool for use in diverse urban elementary schools. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35, 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508410379796
37.
PeltierC.VannestK. J. (2016). Schema-based strategy instruction and the mathematical problem-solving performance of two students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 39, 521–544. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2016.0023
38.
PowellS. R. (2007). Open equations. The University of Texas at Austin.
39.
PowellS. R.BerryK. A. (2015). Texas word problems. The University of Texas at Austin.
40.
PowellS. R.BerryK. A.BarnesM. A. (2020). The role of pre-algebraic reasoning with a word-problem intervention for third-grade students with mathematics difficulty. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52, 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01093-1
41.
PowellS. R.FuchsL. S.CirinoP. T.FuchsD.ComptonD. L.ChangasP. C. (2015). Effects of a multitier support system on calculation, word problem, and prealgebraic performance among at-risk learners. Exceptional Children, 81(4), 443–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914563702
42.
RalstonN. C.BennerG. J.TsaiS. F.RiccominiP. C.NelsonJ. R. (2014). A best evidence synthesis of the effects of mathematics instruction for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Preventing School Failure, 58, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2012.726287
43.
ReidR.GonzalezJ. E.NordnessP. D.TroutA.EpsteinM. H. (2004). A meta-analysis of the academic status of students with emotional/behavioral disturbance. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669040380030101
44.
RosenzweigC.KrawecJ.MontagueM. (2011). Metacognitive strategy use of eighth-grade students with and without learning disabilities during mathematical problem solving: A think-aloud analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 508–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219410378445
45.
RyanJ. B.PierceC. D.MooneyP. (2008). Evidence-based teaching strategies for students with EBD. Beyond Behavior, 17(3), 22–29.
46.
SkagerlundK.TräffU. (2016). Number processing and heterogeneity of developmental dyscalculia: Subtypes with different cognitive profiles and deficits. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414522707
47.
TempletonT. N.NeelR. S.BloodE. (2008). Meta-analysis of math interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 16, 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426608321691
48.
van GarderenD. (2007). Teaching students with LD to use diagrams to solve mathematical word problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 540–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194070400060501
49.
WeiX.LenzK. B.BlackorbyJ. (2013). Math growth trajectories of students with disabilities: Disability category, gender, racial, and socioeconomic status differences from ages 7 to 17. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512448253
50.
What Works Clearinghouse, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. (2017, October). What Works Clearinghouse: Procedures handbook (Version 4.0). https://whatworks.ed.gov
51.
XinY. P.JitendraA. K.Deatline-BuchmanA. (2005). Effects of mathematical word problem-solving instruction on middle school students with learning problems. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669050390030501
