Parity or Disparity? Outcomes of Court-Involved Youth With and Without Disabilities

Abstract

Youth with disabilities are overrepresented in the juvenile justice system, but few studies have investigated the mechanisms by which this occurs. In this study, we considered how juvenile court adjudication and length of commitment in secure facilities contributed to disproportionality in court involvement and detention, addressing an important gap in the intersection of disability and juvenile justice literature. Using linked educational and juvenile justice records of 41,812 youth, we sought to ascertain whether, among juvenile offenders, youth with disabilities had higher likelihood of adjudication as delinquent or placement in secure facilities for longer periods of time compared to youth without disabilities. Results indicated that youth with and without disabilities were adjudicated and placed similarly, suggesting that disparities contributing to overrepresentation of youth with disabilities in detained populations may manifest earlier in youths’ involvement in the justice system. We conclude with implications for research, policy, and practice.

Keywords

special education disabilities disproportionality juvenile court juvenile justice adjudication sentencing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aizer

Doyle

J. J.

(2015). Juvenile incarceration, human capital and future crime: Evidence from randomly-assigned judges. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130, 759–804. doi:10.1093/qje/qjv003

Balfanz

Byrnes

(2013). Meeting the challenge of combating chronic absenteeism: Impact of the NYC mayor’s interagency task force on chronic absenteeism and school attendance and its implications for other cities. Everyone Graduates Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Education. Retrieved from http://new.every1graduates.org/resources/reports

Barnert

E. S.

Perry

Morris

R. E.

(2016). Juvenile incarceration and health. Academic Pediatrics, 16, 99–109. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2015.09.004

Bernburg

J. G.

Krohn

M. D.

Rivera

C. J.

(2006). Official labeling, criminal embeddedness, and subsequent delinquency: A longitudinal test of labeling theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43, 67–88. doi:10.1177/0022427805280068

Bollmer

Bethel

Garrison-Mogren

Brauen

(2007). Using the risk ratio to assess racial/ethnic disproportionality in special education at the school-district level. The Journal of Special Education, 41, 186–198. doi:10.1177/00224669070410030401

Brier

(1989). The relationship between learning disability and delinquency: A review and reappraisal. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 546–553. doi:10.1177/002221948902200906

Bullis

Yovanoff

(2005). More alike than different? Comparison of formerly incarcerated youth with and without disabilities. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 14, 127–139. doi:10.1007/s10826-005-1127-7

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). Registry plus link plus. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/tools/registryplus/lp_features.htm

Cheely

C. A.

Carpenter

L. A.

Letourneau

E. J.

Nicholas

J. S.

Charles

King

L. B.

(2012). The prevalence of youth with autism spectrum disorders in the criminal justice system. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 1856–1862. doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1427-2

10.

Coalition for Juvenile Justice. (2010). Disproportionate minority contact (DMC): Facts and resources. Retrieved from http://www.juvjustice.org

11.

Cummings

(2009). The relative merits of risk ratios and odds ratios. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 163, 438–445. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.31

12.

Geib

C. F.

Chapman

J. F.

D’Amaddio

A. H.

Grigorenko

E. L.

(2011). The education of juveniles in detention: Policy considerations and infrastructure development. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 3–11. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.05.002

13.

Hjalmarsson

(2008). Criminal justice involvement and high school completion. Journal of Urban Economics, 63, 613–630. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2007.04.003

14.

Hockenberry

Puzzanchera

(2018). Juvenile court statistics 2015. Retrieved from http://www.ncjj.org/pdf/jcsreports/jcs2015report.pdf

15.

Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 2002. Pub. L. No. 93-415, 42 U.S.C. § 5601 et seq. Retrieved from https://www.ojjdp.gov/about/jjdpa2002titlev.pdf

16.

Juvenile Justice Reform Act of 2018. Pub. L. No. 115-385.

17.

Katsiyannis

Barrett

D. E.

Zhang

(2012). Juvenile offenders with disabilities: Challenges and promises. In Grigorenko

E. L.

(Ed.), Handbook of juvenile forensic psychology and psychiatry (pp. 521–539). Boston, MA: Springer.

18.

Keilitz

Dunivant

(1986). The relationship between learning disability and juvenile delinquency: Current state of knowledge. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 18–26. doi:10.1177/074193258600700305

19.

Kerley

K. R.

Benson

M. L.

Lee

M. R.

Cullen

F. T.

(2004). Race, criminal justice contact, and adult position in the social stratification system. Social Problems, 51, 549–568. doi:10.1525/sp.2004.51.4.549

20.

Kincaid

A. P.

Sullivan

A. L.

(2019). Double jeopardy? Disproportionality in first juvenile court involvement by disability status. Exceptional Children, 85, 453–470. doi:10.1177/0014402918819101

21.

Krezmien

M. P.

Mulcahy

C. A.

Leone

P. E.

(2008). Detained and committed youth: Examining differences in achievement, mental health needs, and special education status. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 1–20.

22.

Kvarfordt

C. L.

Purcell

Shannon

(2005). Youth with learning disabilities in the juvenile justice system: A training needs assessment of detention and court services personnel. Child & Youth Care Forum, 34, 27–42. doi:10.1007/s10566-004-0880-x

23.

Lambie

Randell

(2013). The impact of incarceration on juvenile offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 448–459. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.01.007

24.

Lamdin

D. J.

(1996). Evidence of student attendance as an independent variable in education production functions. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 155–162. doi:10.1080/00220671.1996.9941321

25.

Leone

P. E.

Meisel

S. M.

Drakeford

(2002). Special education programs for youth with disabilities in juvenile corrections. Journal of Correctional Education, 53, 46–50.

26.

Mendel

R. A.

(2011). No place for kids: The case for reducing juvenile incarceration. Annie E. Casey Foundation. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED527944

27.

Morris

R. J.

Thompson

K. C.

(2008). Juvenile delinquency and special education laws: Policy implementation issues and directions for future research. The Journal of Correctional Education, 59, 173–190.

28.

National Council on Disability. (2003). Addressing the needs of youth with disabilities in the juvenile justice system: The current status of evidence-based research. Retrieved from www.ncd.gov

29.

National Council on Disability. (2015). Breaking the school-to-prison pipeline for students with disabilities. Retrieved from www.ncd.gov

30.

Osher

Woodruff

Sims

A. E.

(2002). Schools make a difference: The overrepresentation of African American youth in special education and the juvenile justice system. In Losen

D. J.

Orfield

(Eds.), Racial inequity in special education (pp. 93–116). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group.

31.

Pyle

Flower

Fall

A. M.

Williams

(2016). Individual-level risk factors of incarcerated youth. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 172–186. doi:10.1177/0741932515593383

32.

Quinn

M. M.

Rutherford

R. B.

Leone

P. E.

Osher

D. M.

Poirer

J. M.

(2005). Youth with disabilities in juvenile corrections: A national survey. Exceptional Children, 71, 339–345. doi:10.1177/001440290507100308

33.

Rivkin

D. H.

(2009). Decriminalizing students with disabilities. New York Law School Law Review, 54, 909–952.

34.

Skiba

R. J.

Artiles

Kozleski

Losen

D. J.

Harry

E. G.

(2016). Risks and consequences of oversimplifying educational inequities: A response to Morgan et al. (2015). Educational Researcher, 45, 221–225. doi:10.3102/0013189X16644606

35.

Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. (2016). International youth justice systems: Promoting youth development and alternative approaches: A position paper of the society for adolescent health and medicine. Journal of Adolescent Health, 59, 482–486. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.08.003

36.

Sullivan

A. L.

Artiles

A. J.

(2011). Theorizing racial inequity in special education: Applying structural theory to disproportionality. Urban Education, 46, 1526–1552. doi:10.1177/0042085911416014

37.

Sullivan

A. L.

Bal

(2013). Disproportionality in special education: Effects of individual and school variables on risk. Exceptional Children, 79, 475–494. doi:10.1177/001440291307900406

38.

Swayze

D. H.

Buskovick

(2014). Youth in Minnesota correctional facilities: Responses to the 2013 Minnesota student survey. Minnesota Department of Public Safety Office of Justice Programs. Retrieved from https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/ojp/forms-documents/Documents/2013%20CKR.pdf

39.

Tulman

J. B.

Weck

D. M.

(2009). Shutting off the school-to-prison pipeline for status offenders with education-related disabilities. New York Law School Law Review, 54, 875–907.

40.

U.S. Department of Justice. (2011, September). Uniform crime report: Offense definitions. Retrieved from https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/offense-definitions

41.

U.S. Department of Justice. (2015). Office of juvenile justice and delinquency prevention: Mission and vision. Retrieved from http://ojjdp.gov/about/missionstatement.html

42.

Zhang

Barrett

D. E.

Katsiyannis

Yoon

(2011). Juvenile offenders with and without disabilities: Risks and patterns of recidivism. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 12–18. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.006

43.

Zhang

K. F.

(1998). What’s the relative risk? A method for correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 1690–1691. doi:10.1001/jama.280.19.1690