Promoting self-determination is critical to enabling young people to achieve education-related goals and positive postschool employment, community participation, and quality of life outcomes. By developing skills associated with self-determination such as choice-making, decision-making, problem solving, goal setting and attainment, planning, self-management, self-advocacy, self-awareness, and self-knowledge, students with disabilities are better prepared to make purposeful decisions and choices. We conducted a meta-analysis of the literature on interventions to promote self-determination and associated skills with students with disabilities in the school context. We analyzed the types of interventions, populations of students with whom they were implemented, outcomes, and rigor of research. Results demonstrated that interventions to promote self-determination can be effective for students across grade levels, disability labels, and settings. There remains a need for increased focus on promoting self-determination within inclusive, general education settings with students with and without disabilities and of diverse backgrounds. Future researchers should also focus on the rigor of methodological design and associated reporting when conducting school-based research. Additional implications for research and practice are discussed.
*AgranM.BlanchardC.WehmeyerM. L.HughesC. (2001). Teaching students to self-regulate their behavior: The differential effects of student- vs. teacher-delivered reinforcement. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 22, 319–332. doi:10.1016/s0891-4222(01)00075-0
2.
*AgranM.BlanchardC.WehmeyerM. L.HughesC. (2002). Increasing the problem-solving skills of students with developmental disabilities participating in general education. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 279–288. doi:10.1177/07419325020230050301
3.
*AgranM.WehmeyerM. L. (2000). Promoting transition goals and self-determination through student self-directed learning: The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 351–364.
4.
AlgozzineB.BrowderD.KarvonenM.TestD. W.WoodW. M. (2001). Effects of interventions to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71, 219–277. doi:10.3102/00346543071002219
5.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470743386
6.
*Campbell-WhatleyG. D. (2008). Teaching students about their disabilities: Increasing self-determination skills and self-concept. International Journal of Special Education, 23, 137–144.
7.
CardN. (2015). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
8.
CobbB.LehmannJ.Newman-GoncharR.AlwellM. (2009). Self-determination for students with disabilities: A narrative metasynthesis. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 108–114. doi:10.1177/0885728809336654
9.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
CookB. G.BuysseV.KlingnerJ. K.LandrumT. J.McWilliamR. A.TankersleyM.TestD. W. (2015). CEC’s standards for classifying the evidence base of practices in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 36, 220–234. doi:10.1177/0741932514557271
11.
*CoteD. L.PierceT.HigginsK.MillerS.TandyR.SparksS. (2010). Increasing skill performances of problem solving in students with intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 512–524.
12.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2014). Standards for evidence-based practices in special education. Exceptional Children, 80, 504–511. doi:10.1177/0014402914531388
13.
Council of Chief State School Officers & National Governors Association. (2011). Common core state standards. Washington, DC: Authors.
14.
*Cuenca-CarlinoY.MustianA. L. (2013). Self-regulated strategy development: Connecting persuasive writing to self-advocacy for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 39, 3–15. doi:10.1177/019874291303900102
15.
*Cuenca-SanchezY.MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT. E.KiddJ. K. (2012). Teaching students with emotional and behavioral disorders to self-advocate through persuasive writing. Exceptionality, 20, 71–93. doi:10.1080/09362835.2012.669291
16.
*DorenB.LombardiA. L.ClarkJ.LindstromL. (2013). Addressing career barriers for high risk adolescent girls: The PATHS curriculum intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 1083–1092. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.08.014
FixsenD. L.NaoomS. F.BlaseK. A.FriedmanR. M.WallaceF. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa: The National Implementation Research Network, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida.
19.
FowlerC. H.KonradM.WalkerA. R.TestD. W.WoodW. M. (2007). Self-determination interventions’ effects on the academic performance of students with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42, 270–285.
20.
*GermanS. L.MartinJ. E.MarshallL. H.SaleR. P. (2000). Promoting self-determination: Using take action to teach goal attainment. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 23, 27–38. doi:10.1177/088572880002300103
21.
*GlagoK.MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT. E. (2009). Improving problem solving of elementary students with mild disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 30, 372–380. doi:10.1177/0741932508324394
22.
HagiwaraM.ShogrenK. A.LekoM. (2017). Reviewing research on the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction: Mapping the terrain and charting a course to promote adoption and use. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 1, 3–13. doi:10.1007/s41252-017-0007-7
23.
*HagnerD.KurtzA.CloutierH.ArakelianC.BruckerD. L.MayJ. (2012). Outcomes of a family-centered transition process for students with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 27, 42–50. doi:10.1177/1088357611430841
24.
HedgesL. V.PustejovskyJ. E.ShadishW. R. (2012). A standardized mean difference effect size for single case designs. Research Synthesis Methods, 3, 224–239. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1052
25.
*KellyJ. R.ShogrenK. A. (2014). The impact of teaching self-determination skills on the on-task and off-task behaviors of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 22, 27–40. doi:10.1177/1063426612470515
26.
*KimN. H.ParkJ. (2012). The effects of the family-involved SDLMI on academic engagement and goal attainment of middle school students with disabilities who exhibit problem behavior. International Journal of Special Education, 27, 117–127.
27.
KleinertJ. O. R.HarrisonE.MillsK. R.DueppenB. M.TrailorA. M. (2014). Self-determined goal selection and planning by students with disabilities across grade bands and disability categories. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 464–477.
28.
KonradM.FowlerC. H.WalkerA. R.TestD. W.WoodW. M. (2007). Effects of self-determination interventions on the academic skills of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30, 89–113. doi:10.2307/30035545
29.
LachapelleY.WehmeyerM. L.HaelewyckM. C.CourboisY.KeithK. D.SchalockR.. . . WalshP. N. (2005). The relationship between quality of life and self-determination: An international study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 740–744. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00743
30.
*LancasterP. E.SchumakerJ. B.DeshlerD. D. (2002). The development and validation of an interactive hypermedia program for teaching a self-advocacy strategy to students with disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 277–302. doi:10.2307/1511358
31.
LaneK. L.KalbergJ. R.ShepcaroJ. C. (2009). An examination of the evidence base for function-based interventions for students with emotional and/or behavioral disorders attending middle and high schools. Exceptional Children, 75, 321–340. doi:10.1177/001440290907500304
32.
LeeS.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.SoukupJ. H.LittleT. D. (2008). Self-determination and access to the general education curriculum. The Journal of Special Education, 42, 91–107. doi:10.1177/0022466907312354
33.
LeeS.WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A. (2015). Effect of instruction with the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on students with disabilities: A meta-analysis. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50, 237–247.
34.
*LeeY.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.Williams-DiehmK.DaviesD. K.StockS. E. (2011). The effect of student-directed transition planning with a computer-based reading support program on the self-determination of students with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 45, 104–117. doi:10.1177/0022466909358916
35.
*LuskS. L.CookD. (2009). Enhancing career exploration, decision making, and problem solving of adolescent girls with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 31, 145–153. doi:10.3233/JVR-2009-0484
36.
MagginD. M.LaneK. L.PustejovskyJ. E. (2017). Introduction to the special issue on single-case systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Remedial and Special Education, 38, 323–330. doi:10.1177/0741932517717043
37.
MazzottiV. L.KelleyK. R.CocoC. M. (2015). Effects of self-directed summary of performance on postsecondary education students’ participation in person-centered planning meetings. The Journal of Special Education, 48, 243–255. doi:10.1177/0022466913483575
38.
*McGlashling-JohnsonJ.AgranM.SitlingtonP.CavinM. (2003). Enhancing the job performance of youth with moderate to severe cognitive disabilities using the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 28, 194–204. doi:10.2511/rpsd.28.4.194
39.
MillerD. L. (2013). Got it wrong? Think again. And again. Phi Delta Kappan, 94, 50–52. doi:10.1177/003172171309400511
40.
MithaugD. K. (2002). “Yes” means success: Teaching children with multiple disabilities to self-regulate during independent work. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 35, 22–27. doi:10.1177/004005990203500104
41.
NotaL.FerrariL.SoresiS.WehmeyerM. (2007). Self-determination, social abilities and the quality of life of people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51, 850–865. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00939.x
42.
*PalmerS. B.WehmeyerM. L. (2003). Promoting self-determination in early elementary school: Teaching self-regulated problem-solving and goal-setting skills. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 115–126. doi:10.1177/07419325030240020601
43.
*PalmerS. B.WehmeyerM. L.GipsonK.AgranM. (2004). Promoting access to the general curriculum by teaching self-determination skills. Exceptional Children, 70, 427–439. doi:10.1177/001440290407000403
44.
*PalmerS. B.WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A.Williams-DiehmK. L.SoukupJ. H. (2012). An evaluation of the Beyond High School model on the self-determination of students with intellectual disability. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 35, 76–84. doi:10.1177/0885728811432165
45.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.DavisJ. L.SauberS. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42, 284–299. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
46.
*PowersL. E.TurnerA.WestwoodD.MatuszewskiJ.WilsonR.PhillipsA. (2001). TAKE CHARGE for the future: A controlled field-test of a model to promote student involvement in transition planning. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24, 89–104. doi:10.1177/088572880102400107
47.
RaleyS. K.Mumbardó-AdamC.ShogrenK. A.Simó-PinatellaD.GinéC. (in press). Curricula to teach skills associated with self-determination: A review of existing research. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities.
48.
RaleyS. K.ShogrenK. A.McDonaldA. (2018). Whole-class implementation of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction in inclusive high school mathematics classes. Inclusion, 6, 164-174. doi:10.1352/2326-6988-6.3.164
49.
RosenthalJ. A. (1996). Qualitative descriptors of strength of association and effect size. Journal of Social Service Research, 21, 37–59. doi:10.1300/j079v21n04_02
50.
RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.CantwellE. D.MessengerM. L. (2017). A systematic review of the evidence base for instructional choice in K-12 settings. Behavioral Disorders, 42, 89–107. doi:10.1177/0198742916688655
51.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.CastoG. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 24–43. doi:10.1177/074193258700800206
52.
*SeongY.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.LittleT. D. (2015). Effects of the self-directed individualized education program on self-determination and transition of adolescents with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38, 132–141. doi:10.1177/2165143414544359
53.
*SheppardL.UnsworthC. (2011). Developing skills in everyday activities and self-determination in adolescents with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 32, 393–405. doi:10.1177/0741932510362223
54.
ShogrenK. A.LittleT. D.WehmeyerM. L. (2017). Human agentic theories and the development of self-determination. In WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A.LittleT. D.LopezS. J. (Eds.), Development of self-determination through the life-course (pp. 17–26). New York, NY: Springer.
55.
*ShogrenK. A.PalmerS. B.WehmeyerM. L.Williams-DiehmK.LittleT. D. (2012). Effect of intervention with the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on access and goal attainment. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 320–330. doi:10.1177/0741932511410072
56.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.BurkeK. M.PalmerS. B. (2017). The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction: Teacher’s guide. Lawrence: Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities.
57.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.LaneK. L. (2016). Embedding interventions to promote self-determination within multi-tiered systems of supports. Exceptionality, 24, 213–224. doi:10.1080/09362835.2015.1064421
58.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.Forber-PrattA. J.LittleT. J.LopezS. (2015). Causal agency theory: Reconceptualizing a functional model of self-determination. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50, 251–263.
59.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.RifenbarkG. G.LittleT. D. (2015). Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 48, 256–267. doi:10.1177/0022466913489733
60.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.SinghN. N. (2017). Introduction to positive psychology. In ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.SinghN. N. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in intellectual and developmental disabilities (pp. 3–11). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59066-0_1
61.
*Taylor-RitzlerT.BalcazarF. E.KeysC. B.HayesE.Garate-SerafiniT.EspinoS. R. (2001). Promoting attainment of transition-related goals among low-income ethnic minority students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24, 147–167. doi:10.1177/088572880102400205
62.
*TestD. W.NealeM. (2004). Using the self-advocacy strategy to increase middle graders’ IEP participation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13, 135–145. doi:10.1023/B: JOBE.0000023660.21195.c2
63.
WehmeyerM. L. (1992). Self-determination and the education of students with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27, 302–314.
64.
WehmeyerM. L. (1997). Self-determination as an educational outcome: A definitional framework and implications for intervention. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 9, 175–209. doi:10.1023/A:1024981820074
65.
WehmeyerM. L.FieldS.DorenB.JonesB.MasonC. (2004). Self-determination and student involvement in standards-based reform. Exceptional Children, 70, 413–425. doi:10.1177/001440290407000402
66.
*WehmeyerM. L.GarnerN.YeagerD.LawrenceM. (2006). Infusing self-determination into 18-21 services for students with intellectual or developmental disabilities: A multi-stage, multiple component model. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 41, 3–13.
67.
*WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.AgranM.MithaugD. E.MartinJ. E. (2000). Promoting causal agency: The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction. Exceptional Children, 66, 439–453. doi:10.1177/001440290006600401
68.
*WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.LeeY.Williams-DiehmK.ShogrenK. A. (2011). A randomized-trial evaluation of the effect of whose future is it anyway? On self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 34, 45–56. doi:10.1177/0885728810383559
69.
*WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.ShogrenK. A.Williams-DiehmK.SoukupJ. H. (2013). Establishing a causal relationship between intervention to promote self-determination and enhanced student self-determination. The Journal of Special Education, 46, 195–210. doi:10.1177/0022466910392377
70.
*WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.Williams-DiehmK.ShogrenK. A.DaviesD. K.StockS. (2011). Technology and self-determination in transition planning: The impact of technology use in transition planning on student self-determination. Journal of Special Education Technology, 26, 13–24. doi:10.1177/016264341102600103
71.
*WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A.PalmerS. B.Williams-DiehmK. L.LittleT. D.BoultonA. (2012). The impact of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on student self-determination. Exceptional Children, 78, 135–153. doi:10.1177/001440291207800201
72.
WoodW. M.FowlerC. H.UpholdN.TestD. W. (2005). A review of self-determination interventions with individuals with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 30, 121–146. doi:10.2511/rpsd.30.3.121
73.
*ZhangD. (2001). The effect of Next STEP instruction on the self-determination skills of high school students with learning disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24, 121–132. doi:10.1177/088572880102400203
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
