This study presents a longitudinal analysis of racial inequities evidenced in placement patterns in the least restrictive environment (LRE). We compared placement trends in neighborhoods and charter schools for Black and White students receiving special education services (SRSES). Drawing from the concept of institutional isomorphism and using a longitudinal analysis of odds ratio, we examined annual school data from 2008 to 2012 on students’ placement in the LRE in Chicago Public Schools (CPS). Our findings indicate that over time charter schools mirror neighborhood schools’ (NS) racial inequities evidenced in access to general education classrooms.
AhramR.FergusE.NogureaP. (2011). Addressing racial/ethnic disproportionality in special education: Case studies of suburban school districts. Teachers College Record, 113, 2233–2266.
2.
AngristJ. D.PathakP. A.WaltersC. R. (2013). Explaining charter school effectiveness. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(4), 1–27.
3.
BenzM.LindstromL.YovanoffP. (2000). Improving graduation and employment outcomes of students with disabilities: Predictive factors and student perspectives. Exceptional Children, 66, 509–529.
4.
BrockM. E.SchaeferJ. M. (2015). Location matters: Geographic location and educational placement of students with developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40, 154–164.
5.
BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.HarrisA. A.WakemanxyaS. (2008). A meta-analysis on teaching mathematics to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74, 407–432.
6.
ChengA.HittC.KisidaB.MillsJ. N. (2017). “No excuses” charter schools: A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence on student achievement. Journal of School Choice, 11, 209–238.
ConnorD. J.FerriB. A. (2013). Historicizing dis/ability: Creating normalcy, containing difference. In WappettM.ArndtK. (Eds.), Foundations of disability studies (pp. 29–67). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
CosierM. E.Causton-ThoedarisJ. (2010). Economic and demographic predictors of inclusive education. Remedial and Special Education, 32, 496–505.
11.
DessemontetR. S.BlessG.MorinD. (2012). Effects of inclusion on the academic achievement and adaptive behaviour of children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 579–587.
12.
de ValenzuelaJ. S.CopelandS. R.Huaqing QiC.ParkM. (2006). Examining educational equity: Revisiting the disproportionate representation of minority students in special education. Exceptional Children, 72, 425–441.
13.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
14.
DunnL. M. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded: Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 35, 5–22.
15.
FerriB. A.ConnorD. J. (2005). Tools of exclusion: Race, disability, and (re)segregated education. Teachers College Record, 107, 453–474.
16.
FierrosE. G.BlombergN. A. (2005). Restrictiveness and race in special education placements in for-profit and non-profit charter schools in California. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 3, 1–16.
17.
FierrosE. G.ConroyJ. W. (2002). Double jeopardy: An exploration of restrictiveness and race in special education. In LosenD. J.OrfieldG. (Eds.), Racial inequity in special education (pp. 39–70). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
18.
FioreT. A.HarwellL. M.BlackorbyJ.FinniganK. S. (2000). Charter schools and students with disabilities: A national study. Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
19.
GarcyA. M. (2011). High expense: Disability severity and charter school attendance in Arizona. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19(6). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/908
20.
GardaR. A. (2012). Culture clash: Special education in charter schools. North Carolina Law Review, 90, 656–718.
21.
HarryB.KlingnerJ. (2013). Why are so many minority students in special education? Understanding race and disability in schools (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
22.
HuertaL. A.ZuckermanA. (2009). An institutional theory analysis of charter schools: Addressing institutional challenges to scale. Peabody Journal of Education, 84, 414–431.
23.
KleinertH.Towles-ReevesE.QuenemoenR.ThurlowM.FlueggeL.WesemanL.KerbelA. (2015). Where students with the most significant cognitive disabilities are taught: Implications for general curriculum access. Exceptional Children, 81, 312–328.
24.
KurthJ. A.MastergeorgeA. M. (2012). Impact of setting and instructional context for adolescents with autism. The Journal of Special Education, 46, 36–48.
25.
KurthJ. A.MorningstarM. E.KozleskiE. B. (2015). The persistence of highly restrictive special education placements for students with low-incidence disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 39, 227–239.
26.
LeRoyB.KulikN. (2001). The demography of inclusive education in Michigan: State and local district findings. Developmental Disabilities Institute, Wayne State University. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED468584.pdf
27.
LeRoyB.KulikN. (2004). The demographics of inclusion: Final report materials for U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University.
28.
LosenD. J.KeithM. A.IIHodsonC. L.MartinezT. E. (2016). Charter schools, civil rights and school discipline: A comprehensive review. Los Angeles, CA: The Center for Civil Rights Remedies at The Civil Rights Project.
29.
MannoB. V.VanourekG.FinnC. E. (1999). Charter schools: Serving disadvantaged youth. Education and Urban Society, 31, 429–445.
30.
MarshL. T. S.NogueraP. A. (2017). Beyond stigma and stereotypes: An ethnographic study on the effects of school-imposed labeling on Black males in an urban charter school. The Urban Review, 50, 447–477.
31.
MickelsonR. A. (2001). Subverting Swann: First- and second-generation segregation in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg schools. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 215–252.
32.
National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. (2017). National charter schools fact. Retrieved from https://data.publiccharters.org/
PayneC.KnowlesT. (2009). Promise and peril: Charter schools, urban reform, and the Obama administration. Harvard Educational Review, 79, 227–239.
35.
RhimL. M.FauknerJ.McLaughlinM. J. (2006). Research report #5: Access and accountability for students with disabilities in California charter schools. College Park: Center for the Study of Exceptional Children and Youth, University of Maryland.
RhimL. M.McLaughlinM. (2007). Students with disabilities in charter schools: What we now know. Focus on Exceptional Children, 39, 1–12.
38.
RogersR. (2002). Through the eyes of the institution: A critical discourse analysis of decision making in two special education meetings. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 33, 213–237.
39.
RojewskiJ. W.LeeI. H.GreggN. (2015). Causal effects of inclusion on postsecondary education outcomes of individuals with high-incidence disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 25, 210–219. doi:10.1177/1044207313505648
40.
ScottW. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41.
SkibaR. J.Poloni-StaudingerL.GalliniS.SimmonsA. B.Feggings-AzzizR. (2006). Disparate access: The disproportionality of African American students with disabilities across educational environments. Exceptional Children, 72, 411–424.
42.
SzumilasM. (2010). Explaining odds ratios. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 19, 227–229.
43.
TaylorS. J. (1988/2004). Caught in the continuum: A critical analysis of the principle of the least restrictive environment. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 29, 218–230.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2012). Charter schools: Additional federal attention needed to help protect access for students with disabilities (GAO-12-543). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12-543
46.
WaitollerF. R. (2017). Black and Latinx students with dis/abilities in charter schools: A summary of the research. Indianapolis, IN: Midwest & Plains Equity Assistance Center.
47.
WaitollerF. R.MagginD. M.TrzaskaA. (2017). A longitudinal comparison of enrollment patterns of students receiving special education in urban neighborhood and charter schools. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 28, 3–12.
48.
WaitollerF. R.NguyenN.SuperG. (2018). The irony of rigor: “No excuses” charter schools at the intersections of race and disability. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. Manuscript in press.
49.
WaitollerF. R.TrzaskaA.RadinskyJ. (2013, December). Students with severe disabilities in charter schools. Annual Meeting of the Association for the Severely Handicapped (TASH), Chicago, IL.
50.
WilkensC. (2011). Students with disabilities in urban Massachusetts charter schools: Access to regular classrooms. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31(1). Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/1374
