Family–professional partnerships are a key support for families of children with disabilities, but little is known about families of children with deaf-blindness. This study examined (a) the factor structures of the Beach Center on Disability Family–Professional Partnership and Family Quality of Life (FQOL) Scales utilizing a national sample of families of children and youth with deaf-blindness (age birth to 22 years), and (b) the relationship between family–professional partnership and FQOL at the subdomain levels. Results suggested a two-factor solution for family–professional partnership (Enhancing Connection and Enhancing Capacity) and a three-factor solution for FQOL (Family Interaction/Parenting Well-being, Social/Emotional Well-being, Physical/Material Well-being). Enhancing Capacity Partnership moderated the relationship between Enhancing Connection Partnership and Family Interaction/Parenting Well-being FQOL. The significance of these findings in light of the existing family–professional partnership literature is discussed, and implications for research and practice are offered.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 1173–1182.
2.
Blue-BanningM.SummersJ. A.FranklandH. C.NelsonL. L.BeegleG. (2004). Dimensions of family and professional partnerships: Constructive guidelines for collaboration. Exceptional Children, 70, 167–184. doi:10.1177/001440290407000203
3.
BoehmT. L.CarterE. W.TaylorJ. L. (2015). Family quality of life during the transition to adulthood for individuals with intellectual disability and/or autism spectrum disorders. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 120, 395–411. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-120.5.395
4.
BrownT. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
5.
BurkeM. M.HodappR. M. (2014). Relating stress of mothers of children with developmental disabilities to family–school partnerships. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 52, 13–23. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-52.1.13
6.
BurkeM. M.HodappR. M. (2016). The nature, correlates, and conditions of parental advocacy in special education. Exceptionality, 24, 137–150. doi:10.1080/09362835.2015.1064412
7.
Correa-TorresS. M.BowenS. K. (2016). Recognizing the needs of families of children and youth who are deafblind. American Annals of the Deaf, 161, 454–461.
8.
CourtadeG. R.LudlowB. L. (2008). Ethical issues and severe disabilities: Programming for students and preparation for teachers. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 27, 36–42.
9.
DunstC. J.BruderM. B. (2002). Valued outcomes of service coordination, early intervention, and natural environments. Exceptional Children, 68, 361–375. doi:10.1177/001440290206800305
10.
DunstC. J.TrivetteC. M.HambyD. W. (2007). Meta-analysis of family-centered helpgiving practices research. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 370–378. doi:10.1002/mrdd.20176
11.
EpsteinJ. L.SandersM. G. (2006). Prospects for change: Preparing educators for school, family, and community partnerships. Peabody Journal of Education, 81, 81–120.
12.
EskowK. G.SummersJ. A.ChassonG. S.MitchellR. (2018). The association between family–teacher partnership satisfaction and outcomes of academic progress and quality of life for children/youth with autism. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 15(1), 16-25. doi:10.1111/jppi.12221
13.
FialkaJ. M.FeldmanA. K.MikusK. C. (2012). Parents and professionals partnering for children with disabilities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
14.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP. (2006). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
15.
FiskeS. T.TaylorS. E. (2013). Social cognition: From brains to culture (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
16.
GardinerE.IarocciG. (2015). Family quality of life and ASD: The role of child adaptive functioning and behavior problems. Autism Research, 8, 199–213. doi:10.1002/aur.1442
17.
GiangrecoM. F.CloningerC. J.MuellerP. H.YuanS.AshworthS. (1991). Perspectives of parents whose children have dual sensory impairments. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 16, 14–24.
18.
HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. (2010). The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
HoffmanL.MarquisJ.PostonD.SummersJ. A.TurnbullA. (2006). Assessing family outcomes: Psychometric evaluation of the beach center family quality of life scale. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1069–1083.
20.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
21.
KyzarK. B.BradyS.SummersJ. A.HainesS. J.TurnbullA. P. (2016). Services and supports, partnership, and family quality of life: Focus on deaf-blindness. Exceptional Children, 83, 77–91. doi:10.1177/0014402916655432
22.
KyzarK. B.SummersJ. A. (2014). Students with deaf-blindness and their families: Service utilization and satisfaction with services. Inclusion, 2, 195–211. doi:10.1352/2326-6988-2.3.195
23.
LudlowB. L.ConnerD.SchechterJ. (2005). Low incidence disabilities and personnel preparation for rural areas: Current status and future trends. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 24(3), 15–24.
24.
MarkowD.MaciaL.LeeH. (2010). The MetLife survey of the American teacher: Challenges for school leadership. New York, NY: MetLife.
25.
MilesB. (2008). Overview on deaf-blindness. DB-LINK, The National Information Clearinghouse on Children Who Are Deaf-Blind Helen Keller National Center. Retrieved from http://documents.nationaldb.org/products/Overview.pdf
RosenthalR.RosnowR. L. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
SheridanS. M.KimE. M.CouttsM. J.SjutsT. M.HolmesS. R.RansomK. A.GarbaczS. A. (2012). Clarifying parent involvement and family-school partnership intervention research: A preliminary synthesis (CYFS Working Paper No. 2012-4). Available from www.cyfs.unl.edu
SummersJ. A.HoffmanL.MarquisJ.TurnbullA.PostonD. (2005). Relationship between parent satisfaction regarding partnerships with professionals and age of child. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 25, 48–58.
31.
SummersJ. A.HoffmanL.MarquisJ.TurnbullA.PostonD.NelsonL. L. (2005). Measuring the quality of family—Professional partnerships in special education services. Exceptional Children, 72, 65–81. doi:10.1177/001440290507200104
32.
SummersJ. A.MarquisJ.MannanH.TurnbullA. P.FlemingK.PostonD. J.. . . KupzykK. (2007). Relationship of perceived adequacy of services, family–professional partnerships, and family quality of life in early childhood service programmes. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 54, 319–338. doi:10.1080/10349120701488848
33.
SunJ. (2005). Assessing goodness of fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37, 240–256.
34.
TurnbullA. P.SummersJ. A.LeeS. H.KyzarK. (2007). Conceptualization and measurement of family outcomes associated with families of individuals with intellectual disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 346–356. doi:10.1002/mrdd.20174
35.
TurnbullA. P.TurnbullR.ErwinE. J.SoodakL. C.ShogrenK. A. (2015). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: Positive outcomes through partnerships and trust (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
36.
U.S. Department of Education. (2016). 38th annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Washington, DC: Author.
37.
WangM.TurnbullA. P.SummersJ. A.LittleT.PostonD. J.MannanH.TurnbullR. (2004). Severity of disability and income as predictors of parents’ satisfaction with their family quality of life during early childhood years. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 29, 82–94.
38.
ZablotskyB.BoswellK.SmithC. (2012). An evaluation of school involvement and satisfaction of parents of children with autism spectrum disorders. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117, 316–330. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-117.4.316
39.
ZunaN.KyzarK. (in press). Fostering family-professional partnerships. In BrownF.McDonnellJ.SnellM. (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
40.
ZunaN.SeligJ. P.SummersJ. A.TurnbullA. P. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis of a family quality of life scale for families of kindergarten children without disabilities. Journal of Early Intervention, 31, 111–125. doi:10.1177/1053815108330369
41.
ZunaN.SummersJ. A.TurnbullA. P.HuX.XuS. (2010). Theorizing about family quality of life. In KoberR. (Ed.), Enhancing the quality of life of people with intellectual disability: From theory to practice (pp. 241-278). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
