The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability and validity of a measure assessing sustainability of school-wide behavior interventions, the School-Wide Universal Behavior Support Sustainability Index: School Teams (SUBSIST). We assessed the stability of the SUBSIST across 3 years of measurement. We also assessed the convergent validity of two key SUBSIST factors, Team Use of Data and District Capacity Building, with more direct measures of these constructs. Results showed stability of the measure across multiple years and statistically significant correlations when compared with other external measures. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
AdelmanH. S.TaylorL. (1997). Toward a scale-up model for replicating new approaches to schooling. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 8, 197–230.
CoffeyJ. H.HornerR. H. (2012). The sustainability of schoolwide positive behavior interventions and supports. Exceptional Children, 78, 407–422.
4.
HornerR. H.KincaidD.SugaiG.LewisT.EberL.BarrettS.. . . JohnsonN. (2014). Scaling up school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports: Experiences of seven states with documented success. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16, 197–208. doi:10.1177/1098300713503685
5.
KlingnerJ. K.BoardmanA. G.McMasterK. L. (2013). What does it take to scale up and sustain evidence-based practices?Exceptional Children, 79, 195–211.
6.
MayS. L.ArdW. I.ToddA. W.HornerR. H.GlasgowA.SugaiG.SpragueJ. R. (2013). School-wide information system. Eugene: Educational and Community Supports, University of Oregon. Available from http://www.pbisapps.org
7.
McIntoshK.DoolittleJ.VincentC. G.HornerR. H.ErvinR. A. (2009). School-wide universal behavior sustainability index: School teams. Vancouver, Canada: The University of British Columbia.
8.
McIntoshK.MacKayL. D.HumeA. E.DoolittleJ.VincentC. G.HornerR. H.ErvinR. A. (2011). Development and initial validation of a measure to assess factors related to sustainability of school-wide positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13, 208–218. doi:10.1177/1098300710385348
9.
McIntoshK.MercerS. H.HumeA. E.FrankJ. L.TurriM. G.MathewsS. (2013). Factors related to sustained implementation of schoolwide positive behavior support. Exceptional Children, 79, 293–311.
10.
McIntoshK.Strickland-CohenM. K.HornerR. H. (2012). Access to District Expertise and Professional Training (ADEPT) (Unpublished research measure). University of Oregon, Eugene.
11.
MercerS. H.McIntoshK.Strickland-CohenM. K.HornerR. H. (2014). Measurement invariance of an instrument assessing sustainability of school-based universal behavior practices. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 125–137.
12.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
13.
PinkelmanS.McIntoshK.RaspicaC.BergT.Strickland-CohenM. K. (2015). Perceived enablers and barriers related to sustainability of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports. Behavioral Disorders, 40, 171–183.
14.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
15.
Sanford DeRousieR. M.BiermanK. L. (2012). Examining the sustainability of an evidence-based preschool curriculum: The REDI program. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 55–65.
16.
SugaiG.Lewis-PalmerT. L.ToddA. W.HornerR. H. (2001). School-Wide Evaluation Tool (SET). Eugene, OR: Educational and Community Supports. Available from http://www.pbis.org
