We systematically reviewed more than 25 years of applied research examining the system of least prompts response prompting procedure with individuals with disabilities. We identified 123 peer-reviewed studies including 413 participants receiving instruction with the system of least prompts. A total of 252 experimental designs were evaluated, with 51 designs indicating a functional relation and the presence of 154 demonstrations of effect across 91 individuals. Our data indicate that the system of least prompts is an evidenced-based practice for teaching chained responses related to community, self-care, and vocational skills to individuals with moderate intellectual disability who are 13 years of age or older. In addition, we present and discuss a method for analyzing and aggregating data from single-case studies to account for noneffects and publication bias when identifying if an intervention meets standards as an evidence-based practice.
AultM. J.WoleryM.DoyleP. M.GastD. L. (1989). Review of comparative studies in instruction of students with moderate and severe handicaps. Exceptional Children, 55, 346–356. doi:10.1177/001440298905500410
2.
BartonE. E. (2015). Teaching generalized pretend play and related behaviors to young children with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 81, 489–506.
3.
BartonE. E.ReichowB.SchnitzA.SmithI. C.SherlockD. (2015). A systematic review of sensory-based treatments for children with disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 37, 64–80. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.11.006
4.
BartonE. E.WoleryM. (2008). Teaching pretend play to children with disabilities: A review of the literature. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 28, 109–125. doi:10.1177/0271121408318799
5.
BrowderD.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.SpoonerF.MimsP. J.BakerJ. N. (2009). Using time delay to teach literacy to students with severe developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75, 343–364.
6.
CihakD. F.AlbertoP. A.KesslerK. B.TaberT. A. (2004). An investigation of instructional scheduling arrangements for community-based instruction. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 25, 67–88. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2003.04.006
7.
CihakD. F.GrimJ. (2008). Teaching students with autism spectrum disorder and moderate intellectual disabilities to use counting-on strategies to enhance independent purchasing skills. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2, 716–727. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2008.02.006
8.
CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
CourtadeG. R.TestD. W.CookB. G. (2014). Evidence-based practices for learners with severe intellectual disability. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 39, 305–318. doi:10.1177/1540796914566711
10.
CoyneM. D.CookB. G.TherrienW. J. (2016). Recommendations for replication research in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 244–253.
11.
DemchakM. A. (1989). A comparison of graduated guidance and increasing assistance in teaching adults with severe handicaps leisure skills. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 24, 45–55.
12.
DoyleP. M.WoleryM.AultM. J.GastD. L. (1988). System of least prompts: A review of procedural parameters. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 13, 28–40. doi:10.1177/154079698801300104
13.
DoyleP. M.WoleryM.GastD. L.AultM. J.WileyK. (1990). Comparison of constant time delay and the system of least prompts in teaching preschoolers with developmental delays. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 11, 1–22.
14.
FisherW. W.KodakT.MooreJ. W. (2007). Embedding an identity-matching task within a prompting hierarchy to facilitate acquisition of conditional discriminations in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 489–499. doi:10.1901/jaba.2007/.40-489
15.
FisherW. W.PiazzaC. C.RoaneH. S. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of applied behavior analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16.
GastD. L. (2011). An experimental approach for selecting a response-prompting strategy for children with developmental disabilities. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 5, 149–155.
17.
HeckamanK. A.AlberS.HooperS.HewardW. L. (1998). A comparison of least-to-most prompts and progressive time delay on the disruptive behavior of students with autism. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 171–201. doi:10.1023/A:1022883523915
18.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446. (2004).
19.
KnightV. F.SartiniE. (2015). A comprehensive literature review of comprehension strategies in core content areas for students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 1213–1229. doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2280-x
20.
KratochwillT. R.BartonE. E. (August, 2015). Special topics: Negative results. Training presented at the IES Summer Research Institute for Single-Case Intervention Design and Analysis, Madison, WI.
21.
LaneJ. D.Lieberman-BetzR.GastD. L. (2016). An analysis of naturalistic interventions for increasing spontaneous expressive language in children with autism spectrum disorder. The Journal of Special Education, 50, 49–61.
22.
LedfordJ. R.LaneJ. D.ElamK. L.WoleryM. (2012). Using response-prompting procedures during small-group direct instruction: Outcomes and procedural variations. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117, 413–434. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-117.5.413
23.
LedfordJ. R.WoleryM. (2013). Procedural fidelity: An analysis of measurement and reporting practices. Journal of Early Intervention, 35, 173–193. doi:10.1177/1053815113515908
24.
LibbyM. E.WeissJ. S.BancroftS.AhearnW. H. (2008). A comparison of most-to-least and least-to-most prompting on the acquisition of solitary play skills. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1, 37–43. doi:10.1080/09362835.2015.1064419
25.
NoellG. H.CallN. A.ArdoinS. P. (2011). Building complex repertoires from discrete behaviors by establishing stimulus control, behavioral chains, and strategic behavior. In FisherW. W.PiazzaC. C.RoaneH. S. (Eds.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis (pp. 250–269). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26.
SchusterJ. W.MorseT. E.AultM. J.CrawfordM. R.WoleryM. (1998). Constant time delay with chained tasks: A review of the literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 21, 74–106.
27.
ShadishW. R.ZelinskyN. A.VeveaJ. L.KratochwillT. R. (2016). A survey of publication practices of single-case design researchers when treatments have small or large effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 656–673. doi:10.1002/jaba.308
28.
SmithK. A.AyresK. M.MechlingL. C.AlexanderJ. L.MatarasT. K.ShepleyS. B. (2015). Evaluating the effects of a video prompt in a system of least prompts procedure. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38, 39-49. doi:10.1177/2165143413511981
29.
SmithK. A.ShepleyS. B.AlexanderJ. L.DavisA.AyresK. M. (2015). Self-instruction using mobile technology to learn functional skills. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 11, 93–100. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2014.12.001
30.
TaberT. A.AlbertoP. A.SeltzerA.HughesM. (2003). Obtaining assistance when lost in the community using cell phones. Research & Practice in Severe Disabilities, 28, 105–116. doi:10.2511/rpsd.28.3.105
31.
TaylorP.CollinsB. C.SchusterJ. W.KleinertH. (2002). Teaching laundry skills to high school students with disabilities: Generalization of targeted skills and nontargeted information. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 172–183.
32.
TestD. W.GrossiT.KeulP. (1988). A functional analysis of the acquisition and maintenance of janitorial skills in a competitive work setting. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 1–7.
33.
Ulke-KurkcuogluB. (2015). A comparison of least-to-most prompting and video modeling for teaching pretend play skills to children with autism spectrum disorder. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15, 599–517. doi:10.12738/estp.2015.2.2541
34.
WalkerG. (2008). Constant and progressive time delay procedures for teaching children with autism: A literature review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 261–275. doi:10.1007/s10803-007-0390-4
35.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2014). Procedures and standards handbooks (Version 3.0). U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/DocumentSum.aspx?sid=19
36.
WoleryM.AultM. J.DoyleP. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities: Use of response prompting strategies. White Plains, NY: Longman.
37.
WoleryM.AultM. J.GastD. L. (1990). Comparison of constant time delay and the system of least prompts in teaching chained tasks. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 25, 253–257.
38.
WoleryM.AultM. J.DoyleP. M.GastD. L. (1986). Comparison of instructional strategies: A literature review (U.S. Department of Education, Grant No. G008530197). Lexington, KY: Department of Special Education.
39.
WoleryM.HemmeterM. L. (2011). Classroom instruction: Background, assumptions, and challenges. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 371–380. doi:10.1177/1053815111429119
40.
WongC.OdomS. L.HumeK. A.CoxA. W.FettigA.KucharczykS.SchultzT. R. (2015). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: A comprehensive review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 1951–1966. doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2351-z
41.
WuP. F.WheatonJ. E.Cannella-MaloneH. I. (2016). Effects of video prompting and activity schedules on the acquisition of independent living skills of students who are deaf and have developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 51, 366.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
