Ecological Factors Affecting Access to General Education Content and Contexts for Students With Significant Disabilities

Abstract

In this review, we applied Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory to examine factors that support or restrict access to the general curriculum for students with significant disabilities. We organize the literature in relationship to factors within the micro-, meso-, macro-, exo-, and chronosystems that influence decisions about access to the general curriculum for individual students. We discuss these factors in relationship to placement, instructional contexts, and instructional content. Implications for research and practice are provided.

Keywords

inclusion significant disabilities general curriculum content decision-making

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agran

Alper

Wehmeyer

(2002). Access to the general curriculum for students with significant disabilities: What it means to teachers. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 123–133.

Brock

M. E.

Carter

E. W.

(2015). Effects of a professional development package to prepare special education paraprofessionals to implement evidence-based practice. The Journal of Special Education, 49, 39–51.

Bronfenbrenner

(1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513–531.

Bronfenbrenner

(1994). Ecological models of human development. Readings on the Development of Children, 2,37–43.

Brown

Nietupski

Hamre-Nietupski

(1976). Criterion of ultimate functioning. In Thomas

M. A.

(Ed.), Hey don’t forget about me! Education’s investment in the severely, profoundly, and multiply handicapped (pp. 2–15). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.

Brownell

M. T.

Pajares

(1999). Teacher efficacy and perceived success in mainstreaming students with learning and behavior problems. Teacher Education and Special Education, 22, 154–164.

Cameron

D. L.

(2014). An examination of teacher–student interactions in inclusive classrooms: Teacher interviews and classroom observations. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 14, 264–273.

Carr

E. G.

(1994). Emerging themes in the functional analysis of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 393–399.

Carter

E. W.

Moss

C. K.

Hoffman

Chung

Y. C.

Sisco

(2011). Efficacy and social validity of peer support arrangements for adolescents with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 78, 107–125.

10.

Carter

E. W.

Sisco

Melekoglu

M. A.

Kurkowski

(2007). Peer supports as an alternative to individually assigned paraprofessionals in inclusive high school classrooms. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 32, 213–227.

11.

Causton-Theoharis

Theoharis

Orsati

Cosier

(2011). Does self-contained special education deliver on its promises? A critical inquiry into research and practice. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 24, 61–78.

12.

Cosier

M. E.

Causton-Theoharis

(2011). Economic and demographic predictors of inclusive education. Remedial and Special Education, 32, 496–505. doi.org/10.1177/0741932510362513

13.

Cosier

Causton-Theoharis

Theoharis

(2013). Does access matter? Time in general education and achievement for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 323–332.

14.

de Boer

Pijl

S. J.

Minnaert

(2011). Regular primary schoolteachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: A review of the literature. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15, 331–353.

15.

Defur

S. H.

Todd-Allen

Getzel

E. E.

(2001). Parent participation in the transition planning process. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24, 19–36.

16.

Delano

M. E.

Keefe

Perner

(2008). Personnel preparation: Recurring challenges and the need for action to ensure access to general education. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 33, 232–240.

17.

Dymond

S. K.

Renzaglia

Gilson

C. L.

Slagor

M. T.

(2007). Defining access to the general curriculum for high school students with significant cognitive disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 32, 1–15.

18.

Eaves

L. C.

H. H.

(1997). School placement and academic achievement in children with autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 9, 277–291.

19.

Ferguson

D. L.

(1985). The ideal and the real: The working out of public policy in curricula for significantly handicapped students. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 52–60.

20.

Fisher

Frey

Thousand

(2003). What do special educators need to know and be prepared to do for inclusive schooling to work? Teacher Education and Special Education, 26, 42–50.

21.

Ford

Davern

Schnorr

(2001). Learners with significant disabilities: Curricular relevance in an era of standards-based reform. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 214–222. doi:10.1177/074193250102200405

22.

Frattura

Capper

C. A.

(2006). Segregated programs versus integrated comprehensive service delivery for all learners: Assessing the differences. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 355–364.

23.

Gehrke

R. S.

Cocchiarella

(2013). Preservice special and general educators’ knowledge of inclusion. Teacher Education and Special Education, 36, 204–216.

24.

Giangreco

M. F.

Broer

S. M.

(2005). Questionable utilization of paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: Are we addressing symptoms or causes? Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 10–26.

25.

Giangreco

M. F.

Doyle

M. B.

Suter

J. C.

(2012). Constructively responding to requests for paraprofessionals: We keep asking the wrong questions. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 362–373. doi:10.1177/0741932511413472

26.

Giangreco

M. F.

Edelman

S. W.

Luiselli

T. E.

MacFarland

S. Z.

(1997). Helping or hovering? Effects of instructional assistant proximity on students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 7–18.

27.

Goldstein

Strickland

Turnbull

Curry

(1980). An observational analysis of the IEP conference. Exceptional Children, 46, 276–286.

28.

Hughes

Kaplan

Bernstein

Boykin

Reilly

Brigham

. . . Harvey

(2013). Increasing social interaction skills of secondary school students with autism and/or intellectual disability: A review of interventions. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 37, 288–307.

29.

Hunt

McDonnell

Crockett

M. A.

(2012). Reconciling an ecological curricular framework focusing on quality of life outcomes with the development and instruction of standards-based academic goals. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 37, 139–152.

30.

Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400et seq (2004 & Supp. V. 2011).

31.

Jackson

L. B.

(2014). What legitimizes segregation? The context of special education discourse A response to Ryndak et al. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 39, 156–160.

32.

Jackson

L. B.

Ryndak

D. L.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

(2008). The dynamic relationship between context, curriculum, and student learning: A case for inclusive education as a research-based practice. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 33, 175–195.

33.

Kleinert

Towles-Reeves

Quenemoen

Thurlow

Fluegge

Weseman

Kerbel

(2015). Where students with the most significant cognitive disabilities are taught: Implications for general curriculum access. Exceptional Children, 81, 312–328.

34.

Kurth

J. A.

(2014). Educational placement of students with autism: The impact of state of residence. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1088357614547891

35.

Kurth

J. A.

Mastergeorge

A. M.

(2010a). Academic and cognitive profiles of students with autism: Implications for classroom practice and placement. International Journal of Special Education, 25, 8–14.

36.

Kurth

J. A.

Mastergeorge

A. M.

(2010b). Individual education plan goals and services for adolescents with autism: Impact of age and educational setting. The Journal of Special Education, 44, 146–160.

37.

Kurth

J. A.

Morningstar

M. E.

Kozleski

E. B.

(2014). The persistence of highly restrictive special education placements for students with low-incidence disabilities. Research and Practice For Persons With Severe Disabilities, 39, 227–239.

38.

Lauderdale-Littin

Howell

Blacher

(2013). Educational placement for children with autism spectrum disorders in public and non-public school settings: The impact of social skills and behavior problems. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 469–478.

39.

Lipsky

(2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service (30th anniversary expanded edition). New York, NY: Russell Sage.

40.

Martin

J. E.

Van Dyke

Greene

B. A.

Gardner

J. E.

Christensen

W. R.

Woods

L. L.

Lovett

D. L.

(2006). Direct observation of teacher-directed IEP meetings: Establishing the need for student IEP meeting instruction. Exceptional Children, 72, 187–200.

41.

McCarthy

M. R.

Wiener

Soodak

L. C.

(2012). Vestiges of segregation in the implementation of inclusion policies in public high schools. Educational Policy, 26, 309–338. doi:10.1177/0895904810386596

42.

Mehan

Hertweck

Meihls

(1986). Handicapping the handicapped. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

43.

National Center on Educational Outcomes. (2013). Retrieved from www.cehd.umn.edu/NCEO/TOPICAREAS/AlternateAssessments/altAssessFAQ.htm

44.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. §§ 6301 et seq (2006 & Supp. V. 2011).

45.

Roach

Salisbury

McGregor

(2002). Applications of a policy framework to evaluate and promote large-scale change. Exceptional Children, 68, 451–464.

46.

Ruppar

A. L.

Dymond

S. K.

Gaffney

J. S.

(2011). Teachers’ perspectives on literacy instruction for students with significant disabilities who use augmentative and alternative communication. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 36, 100–111.

47.

Ruppar

A. L.

Gaffney

J. S.

(2011). Individualized education program team decisions: A preliminary study of conversations, negotiations, and power. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 36, 11–22.

48.

Ruppar

A. L.

Gaffney

J. S.

Dymond

S. K.

(2015). Influences on teachers’ decisions about literacy for secondary students with significant disabilities. Exceptional Children, 81, 209–226.

49.

Ruppar

A. L.

Roberts

Olson

A. J.

(2015). Faculty perceptions of expertise among teachers of students with severe disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 38, 240–253. doi:10.1177/0888406414552331

50.

Ryndak

D. L.

Jackson

L. B.

White

J. M.

(2013). Involvement and progress in the general curriculum for students with extensive support needs: K–12 inclusive-education research and implications for the future. Inclusion, 1, 28–49.

51.

Ryndak

D. L.

Morrison

A. P.

Sommerstein

(1999). Literacy before and after inclusion in general education settings: A case study. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 24, 5–22.

52.

Ryndak

D. L.

Taub

Jorgensen

C. M.

Gonsier-Gerdin

Arndt

Sauer

. . . Allcock

(2014). Policy and the impact on placement, involvement, and progress in general education: Critical issues that require rectification. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 39, 65–74.

53.

Sailor

W. S.

McCart

A. B.

(2014). Stars in alignment. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39, 55–64. doi:10.1177/1540796914534622

54.

Salend

S. J.

Garrick Duhaney

L. M.

(1999). The impact of inclusion on students with and without disabilities and their educators. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 114–126.

55.

Salisbury

C. L.

(2006). Principals’ perspectives on inclusive elementary schools. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 31, 70–82.

56.

Sileo

Prater

M. A.

Luckner

J. L.

Rhine

Rude

H. A.

(1998). Strategies to facilitate preservice teachers’ active involvement in learning. Teacher Education and Special Education, 21, 187–204.

57.

Simplican

S. C.

Leader

Kosciulek

Leahy

(2015). Defining social inclusion of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: An ecological model of social networks and community participation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 18–29.

58.

Skiba

R. J.

Simmons

A. B.

Ritter

Gibb

A. C.

Rausch

M. K.

Cuadrado

Chung

C. G.

(2008). Achieving equity in special education: History, status, and current challenges. Exceptional Children, 74, 264–288.

59.

Skrtic

T. M.

Sailor

Gee

(1996). Voice, collaboration, and inclusion democratic themes in educational and social reform initiatives. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 142–157.

60.

Spann

S. J.

Kohler

F. W.

Soenksen

(2003). Examining parents’ involvement in and perceptions of special education services: An interview with families in a parent support group. Focus on Autism and other Developmental Disabilities, 18, 228–237.

61.

Spooner

Dymond

S. K.

Smith

Kennedy

C. H.

(2006). What we know and need to know about accessing the general curriculum for students with significant cognitive disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 31, 277–283.

62.

Stowitschek

J. J.

Cheney

D. A.

Schwartz

I. S.

(2000). Instigating fundamental change through experiential inservice development. Teacher Education and Special Education, 23, 142–156.

63.

Timberlake

M. T.

(2014). Weighing costs and benefits: Teacher interpretation and implementation of access to the general education curriculum. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 39, 83–99.

64.

Timberlake

M. T.

(2016). The path to academic access for students with significant cognitive disabilities. The Journal of Special Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0022466914554296

65.

Trainor

A. A.

(2010). Diverse approaches to parent advocacy during special education home-school interactions: Identification and use of cultural and social capital. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 34–47.

66.

Trela

Jimenez

B. A.

(2013). From different to differentiated: Using “ecological framework” to support personally relevant access to general curriculum for students with significant intellectual disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 38, 117–119. doi:10.2511/027494813807714537

67.

U.S. Department of Education. (2013). Annual reports to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/2013/index.html

68.

Van Laarhoven

T. R.

Munk

D.D.

Lynch

Bosma

Rouse

(2007). A model for preparing special and general education preservice teachers for inclusive education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 440–455. doi:10.1177/0022487107306803

69.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

(2006). Beyond access: Ensuring progress in the general education curriculum. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 31, 322–326.

70.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Lance

G. D.

Bashinski

(2002). Promoting access to the general curriculum for students with mental retardation: A multi-level model. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 223–234.