A disproportionate number of students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are below grade level in reading. This trend may be due in part to characteristics of the disability, but it may also reflect lack of access to the instructional conditions needed for success in beginning reading. In this study, we surveyed special education teachers to investigate the conditions of reading instruction for K-3 students with ASD. Consistent with recommendations regarding beginning reading, teachers (n = 66) indicated that the vast majority of students with ASD (n = 226) participated in daily reading instruction and received more comprehensive instruction than the sight word approach that has been used in the past. Findings of concern included frequency of use of paraprofessionals to provide primary instruction, teachers’ relatively low self-efficacy for teaching reading to students with ASD, and provision of less than the recommended instructional time for K-3 reading.
AllinderR. M. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 86–95.
2.
AllinderR. M. (1995). An examination of the relationship between teacher efficacy and curriculum-based measurement and student achievement. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 247–254.
3.
AllingtonR. L. (2009). What really matters in response to intervention: Research-based designs. Boston, MA: Pearson.
4.
AllingtonR. L. (2013). What really matters with struggling readers. The Reading Teacher, 66, 520–530.
5.
ArmbrusterB. B.LehrF.OsbornJ. (2006). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read: Kindergarten through grade 3 (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
6.
AsbergJ.DahlgrenS.SandbergA. D. (2008). Basic reading skills in high-functioning Swedish children with autism spectrum disorders or attention disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2, 95–109.
7.
AshtonP.WebbR. (1986). Making a difference: Teacher efficacy and student achievement. White Plains, NY: Longman.
8.
BaumannJ. F.BasonJ. J. (2011). Understanding literacy trends through survey research. In DukeN. K.MaletteM. H. (Eds.), Literacy research methodologies (2nd ed., pp. 404–426). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
9.
BaumannJ. F.HoffmanJ. V.Duffy-HesterA. M.RoJ. M. (2000). The first R yesterday and today: U.S. elementary instruction reading practices reported by teachers and administrators. The Reading Teacher, 51, 636–650.
10.
BermanP.McLaughlinM.BassG.PaulyE.ZellmanG. (1977). Federal programs supporting educational change: Vol. VII. Factors affecting implementation and continuation (Rep. No. R-1589/7-HEW). Santa Monica, CA: RAND. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 140 432)
11.
BraungerJ.LewisJ. P. (2006). Building a knowledge base in reading (2nd ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
12.
BrowderD. M.WakemanS.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.AlgozzineB. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392–408.
13.
BrownH. M.Oram-CardyJ.JohnsonA. (2013). A meta-analysis of the reading comprehension skills of individuals on the autism spectrum. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 932–955.
14.
ChiangH.LinY. (2007). Reading comprehension instruction for students with autism spectrum disorders: A review of the literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 259–267.
15.
EhriL. C.DreyerL. G.FlugmanB.GrossA. (2007). Reading rescue: An effective tutoring intervention model for language minority students who are struggling readers in first grade. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 414–448.
16.
EstesA.RiveraV.BryanM.CaliP.DawsonG. (2011). Discrepancies between academic achievement and intellectual ability in higher-functioning school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 1044–1052.
17.
FoormanB. R.ConnorC. M. (2010). Primary grade reading. In KamilM. L.PearsonP. D.MojeE. B.AfflerbachP. P. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 136–156). New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
GiangrecoM. F. (2010). One-to-one paraprofessionals for students with disabilities in inclusive classrooms: Is conventional wisdom wrong?Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 1–13.
19.
GibsonS.DemboM. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569–582.
20.
GriffithsY.StuartM. (2013). Reviewing evidence-based practice for pupils with dyslexia and literacy difficulties. Journal of Research in Reading, 36, 96–116.
21.
GuoY.PiastaS. B.JusticeL. M.KaderavekJ. N. (2010). Relations among preschool teachers’ self-efficacy, classroom quality, and children’s language and literacy gains. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1094–1103.
22.
GuskeyT. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 63–69.
23.
HuemerS. V.MannV. (2010). A comprehensive profile of decoding and comprehension in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 485–493.
24.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
25.
JaegerR. M. (1997). Survey methods in education. In JaegerR. M. (Ed.), Complementary methods for research in education (2nd ed., pp. 449–476). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
26.
KliewerC.BiklenD. (2001). “School’s not really a place for reading”: A research synthesis of the literate lives of students with severe disabilities. The Journal for the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 26, 1–12.
27.
KurzA.ElliottS. N.LemonsC.ZigmondN.KlooA.KettlerR. (2014). Assessing opportunity-to-learn for students with disabilities in general and special education classes. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 40, 24–39. doi:10.1177/1534508414522585
28.
LaneK. L.FletcherT.CarterE. W.DejudC.DeLorenzoJ. (2007). Paraprofessional-led phonological awareness training with youngsters at risk for reading and behavioral concerns. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 266–276.
29.
MayesS. D.CalhounS. L. (2003). Ability profiles in children with autism: Influence of age and IQ. Autism, 6, 65–80.
30.
McCutchenD.AbbottR. D.GreenL. B.BeretvasS. N.CoxS.PotterN. S.. . .GrayA. (2002). Beginning literacy: Links among teacher knowledge, teacher practice, and student learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 69–86.
31.
McCutchenD.GreenL.AbbottR. D.SandersE. (2009). Further evidence for teacher knowledge: Supporting struggling readers in grades three through five. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 401–423.
32.
MellardD.McKnightM.JordanJ. (2010). RtI tier structures and instructional intensity. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25, 217–225.
33.
MesmerH. E. (2006). Beginning reading materials: A national survey of primary teachers’ reported uses and beliefs. Journal of Literacy Research, 38, 389–425.
34.
MirendaP. (2003). “He’s not really a reader . . .”: Perspectives on supporting literacy development in individuals with autism. Topics in Language Disorders, 23, 271–282.
35.
MoatsL. C. (1999). Teaching reading is rocket science: What expert teachers of reading should know and be able to do. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.
36.
NationK.ClarkeP.WrightB.WilliamsC. (2006). Patterns of reading ability in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 911–919.
37.
NationK.NorburyC. (2005). Why reading comprehension fails: Insights from developmental disorders. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 21–32.
38.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards: English/language arts. Washington, DC: Author.
39.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication 00–4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office
40.
NewmanT. M.MacomberD.NaplesA. J.BabitaT.VolkmarF.GrigorenkoE. L. (2007). Hyperlexia in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 760–774.
41.
No Child Left Behind Act, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq. (2001).
42.
NorburyC.NationK. (2011). Understanding variability in reading comprehension in adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: Interactions with language status and decoding skill. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 191–210.
43.
PearsonP. D. (2003). The role of professional knowledge in reading reform. Language Arts, 81, 14–15.
44.
PiastaS. B.ConnorC. M.FishmanB. J.MorrisonF. J. (2009). Teachers’ knowledge of literacy concepts, classroom practices, and student reading growth. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 224–248.
45.
PodhajskiB.MatherN.NathanJ.SammonsJ. (2009). Professional development in scientifically based reading instruction: Teacher knowledge and reading outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 403–417.
46.
RickettsJ.JonesC. R.HappéF.CharmanT. (2013). Reading comprehension in autism spectrum disorders: The role of oral language and social functioning. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 807–816.
47.
RowanB.CamburnE.CorrentiR. (2004). Using teacher logs to measure the enacted curriculum: A study of literacy teachers in third-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 105, 75–101.
48.
SchoplerE.ReichlerR. J.RennerB. R. (1998). Childhood Autism Rating Scale. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
49.
SnowC. E.BurnsM. S.GriffinP. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
50.
SnowC. E.GriffinP.BurnsM. S. (Eds.). (2005). Knowledge to support the teaching of reading: Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
51.
Tschannen-MoranM.Woolfolk-HoyA.HoyW. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202–248.
52.
VadasyP. F.SandersE. A. (2009). Supplemental fluency intervention and determinants of reading outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 383–425.
53.
VadasyP. F.SandersE. A.PeytonJ. A. (2006a). Code-oriented instruction for kindergarten students at-risk for reading difficulties: A randomized field trial with paraeducator implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 508–528.
54.
VadasyP. F.SandersE. A.PeytonJ. A. (2006b). Paraeducator-supplemented instruction in structural analysis with text reading practice for second and third graders at risk for reading problems. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 365–378.
55.
VadasyP. F.SandersE. A.TudorS. (2007). Effectiveness of paraeducator-supplemented individual instruction: Beyond basic decoding skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 508–525.
56.
VaughnS.DentonC. A.FletcherJ. M. (2010). Why intensive interventions are necessary for students with severe reading difficulties. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 432–444.
57.
VaughnS.MoodyS. W.SchummJ. S. (1998). Broken promises: Reading instruction in the resource room. Exceptional Children, 64, 211–225.
58.
WanzekJ.VaughnS. (2007). Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36, 541–561.
59.
WasikB. A.SlavinR. E. (1993). Preventing early reading failure with one-to-one tutoring: A review of five programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 178–200.
60.
WhalonK. J.Al OtaibaS.DelanoM. (2009). Evidence-based reading instruction for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disorders, 24, 3–16.
61.
WhalonK. J.HartJ. E. (2011). Children with autism spectrum disorder and literacy instruction: An exploratory study of elementary inclusive settings. Remedial and Special Education, 32, 243–255.
62.
WilliamsonP.CarnahanC. R.JacobsJ. A. (2012). Reading comprehension profiles of high-functioning students on the autism spectrum: A grounded theory. Exceptional Children, 78, 449–469.
63.
WillisG. B. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
