In this article, I outline thoughts regarding the complexities and possibilities of the next generation of reading intervention for students who do not benefit from typical instructional practices. I ground my recommendations in school-based research and observations conducted primarily in kindergarten through third grade and more recently in Grades 6 through 10. Building on principles and practices that have accrued through experimental research, I discuss the importance of enhancing the impact of reading instruction by reinforcing and articulating connections within and between intervention tiers. Specifically, I focus on the potential of (a) fortified Tier 1 foundations, (b) aligned Tier 1 and Tier 2 interventions, (c) bridged instruction to support critical reading transitions, and (d) flexible, responsive Tier 2/Tier 3 interventions.
AscherK. (2011). Heights: Anatomy of a skyscraper. London, England: Penguin Press.
2.
BozzoL. M.FenvesG. L. (1994). Qualitative reasoning and the representation of fundamental principles in structural engineering. Research in Engineering Design, 6, 61–72. doi:10.1007/BF01579984
3.
CattsH. W.ComptonD.TomblinJ. B.BridgesM. S. (2012). Prevalence and nature of late-emerging poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 166–181. doi:10.1037/a0025323
4.
ClemensN.SimmonsD.OslundE.CoyneM. (April, 2014). Examining the role of vocabulary knowledge in struggling comprehenders. Invited session at the Annual conference of the Council for Exceptional Children, Philadelphia, PA.
5.
ConnorC. M.AlbertoP. A.ComptonD. L.O’ConnorR. E. (2014). Improving reading outcomes for students with or at risk for reading disabilities: A synthesis of the contributions from the Institute of Education Sciences Research Centers (NCSER 2014-3000). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research. Available from http://ies.ed.gov/
6.
ConnorC. M.MorrisonF. J.FishmanB.CroweE. C.Al OtaibaS.SchatschneiderC. (2013). A longitudinal cluster-randomized controlled study on the accumulating effects of individualized literacy instruction on students’ reading from first through third grade. Psychological Science, 24, 1408–1419. doi:10.1177/0956797612472204
7.
CoyneM. D.Kame’enuiE. J.SimmonsD. C.HarnB. A. (2004). Beginning reading intervention as inoculation or insulin: First-grade reading performance of strong responders to kindergarten intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 90–104. doi:10.1177/00222194040370020101
8.
CoyneM. D.LittleM.RawlinsonD.SimmonsD.KwokO.KimM. . . . CivetelliC. (2013). Replicating the impact of a supplemental beginning reading intervention: The role of instructional context. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6, 1–23. doi:10.1080/19345747.2012.706694
9.
CoyneM. D.SimmonsD. C.Hagan-BurkeS.SimmonsL. E.KwokO.Kim . . . RawlinsonD. M. (2013). Adjusting beginning reading intervention based on student performance: An experimental evaluation. Exceptional Children, 80, 25–44.
10.
DentonC. A. (2012). Response to intervention for reading difficulties in the primary grades: Some answers and lingering questions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 232–243. doi:10.1177/0022219412442155
11.
FogartyM.OslundE.SimmonsD.DavisJ.SimmonsL.AndersonL. . . . RobertsG. (2014). Examining the effectiveness of a multicomponent reading comprehension intervention in middle schools: A focus on treatment fidelity. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 425–449. doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9270-6
12.
FoormanB. R.FrancisD. J.FletcherJ. M.SchatschneiderC.MehtaP. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37–55. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.37
13.
FuchsL. S.VaughnS. (2012). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 195–203. doi:10.1177/0022219412442150
14.
GerstenR.ComptonD.ConnorC. M.DiminoJ.SantoroL.Linan-ThompsonS.TillyW. D. (2009). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to intervention and multi-tier intervention in the primary grades—A practice guide (NCEE 2009-4045). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/
15.
HarnB. A.ChardD. J.BiancarosaG.Kame’enuiE. J. (2011). Coordinating instructional supports to accelerate at-risk first-grade readers’ performance. The Elementary School Journal, 112, 332–355.
O’ConnorR. E.FulmerD.HartyK. R.BellK. M. (2005). Layers of reading intervention in kindergarten through third grade: Changes in teaching and student outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 440–455. doi:10.1177/00222194050380050701
18.
SimmonsD. C.FogartyM.OslundE. L.SimmonsL. E.HairrellA.DavisJ. . . . FallA. (2014). Integrating content knowledge-building and student-regulated comprehension practices in secondary English language arts classes. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7, 309–330. doi:10.1080/19345747.2013.836766
19.
VellutinoF. R.ScanlonD. M.SmallS.FanueleD. P. (2006). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 157–169. doi:10.1177/00222194060390020401
