Early literacy skills are critical for success in school, yet many children fail to obtain these skills in a timely manner leaving them unable to perform at minimal academic expectations. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of word box instruction, a research-based intervention designed to promote phonemic awareness, on the phonological, reading, and spelling skills of three kindergartners. A multiple probe design across the three skills was sequentially replicated across students to determine the effectiveness of the intervention. Results demonstrated a functional relation between the word box instruction and increases in all three students’ segmenting skills and letter–sound correspondences, along with demonstrated improvements in spelling and reading.
AdamsM. J.FoormanB. R.LundbergI.BeelerT. (1998). Phonological awareness in young children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
2.
AllorJ. H. (2002). The relationship of phoneme awareness and rapid naming to reading development. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 47–58.
3.
Al OtabaS.ConnorC.LaneH.KosanovichM. L.SchatschneiderC.DyrlundA. K. . . . WrightT. L. (2008). Reading First kindergarten classroom instruction and students’ growth in phonological awareness and letter-naming-decoding fluency. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 281–314.
4.
AnthonyJ. L.FrancisD. J. (2005). Development of phonological awareness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 255–259. Available from cdp.sagepub.com
5.
BallE. W.BlachmanB. A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling?Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 49–66.
6.
BiancarosaC.SnowC. E. (2006). Reading next—A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
7.
BradleyL.BryantP. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read—a causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.
8.
BursuckW. D.DamerM. (2011). Teaching reading to students who are at risk or have disabilities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
9.
CarnineD. W.SilbertJ.Kame’enuiE. J.TarverS. G. (Ed.). (2004). Direct reading instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
10.
CoyneM. D.Kame’enuiE. J.SimmonsD. C.HarnB. A. (2004). Beginning reading intervention as inoculation or insulin: First-grade reading performance of strong responders to kindergarten intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 90–104.
11.
DalyE. J.IIIChafouleasS.SkinnerC. H. (2005). Interventions for reading problems: Designing and evaluating effective strategies. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
12.
Dougherty StahlK. A.StahlS. A.McKennaM. C. (1999). The development of phonological awareness and orthographic processing in Reading Recovery. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 4, 27–42.
13.
EhriL. C. (2004). Teaching phonemic awareness and phonics: An explanation of the National Reading Panel meta-analysis. In McCardleP.ChhabraV. (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 153–186). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
14.
ElkoninD. B. (1963). The psychology of mastering the elements of reading. In SimonB.SimonJ. (Eds.), Educational psychology in the U.S.S.R. (pp. 165–179). London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
15.
ElkoninD. B. (1973). USSR. In DowningJ. (Ed.), Comparative reading (pp. 551–579). New York, NY: Macmillan.
16.
FletcherJ. M.LyonG. R.FuchsL. S.BarnesM. A. (2007). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
17.
GoughP. B. (1996). How children learn to read and why they fail. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 3–20.
18.
HatcherP. J.HulmeC.SnowlingM. (2004). Explicit phoneme training combined with phonic reading instruction helps young children at risk of reading failure. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 338–358.
19.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
20.
HornerS. L.O’ConnorE. A. (2007). Helping beginning and struggling readers to develop self-regulated strategies: A reading recovery example. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23, 97–109.
21.
JosephL. M. (1998–1999). Word boxes help children with learning disabilities identify and spell words. The Reading Teacher, 52, 348–356.
22.
JosephL. M. (2000). Developing first graders’ phonemic awareness, word identification and spelling: A comparison of two contemporary phonic instructional approaches. Reading Research & Instruction, 39, 160–169.
23.
JosephL. M. (2002a). Facilitating word recognition and spelling using word boxes and word sort procedures. School Psychology Review, 31, 122–129.
24.
JosephL. M. (2002b). Helping children link sound to print: Phonics procedures for small-group or whole-class settings. Intervention in School and Clinic, 37, 217–221.
25.
JuelC. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437–447.
26.
MillerC. J.MillerS. R.BloomJ. S.JonesL.LindstromW.CraggsJ. . . . HyndG. W. (2006). Testing the double-deficit hypothesis in an adult sample. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 83–101.
27.
MoatsL. C. (2010). Speech to print: Language essentials for teachers (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
28.
MurrayB. A.LesniakT. (1999). The letterbox lesson: A hands-on approach for teaching decoding. The Reading Teacher, 52, 644–650.
29.
NationK.HulmeC. (1997). Phonemic segmentation, not onset-rime segmentation, predicts early reading and spelling skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 154–167.
30.
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2011). The nation’s report card: Reading 2011. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
33.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.BrownL. (2009). The improvement rate difference for single-case research. Exceptional Children, 75, 135–150.
34.
SchueleC. M.BoudreauD. (2008). Phonological awareness intervention: Beyond the basics. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39, 3–20.
35.
ShankweilerD.LibermanI. Y. (1972). Misreading: A search for causes. In KavanaghJ. F.MattinglyI. G. (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye: The relationship between speech and reading (pp. 293–317). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
SlocumT. A. (2004). Direct instruction: The big ideas. In MoranD. J.MalottR. W. (Eds.), Evidence-based educational methods (pp. 81–91). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
37.
SmithS. L.ScottK. A.RobertsJ.LockeJ. (2008). Disabled readers’ performance on tasks of phonological processing, rapid naming, and letter knowledge before and after kindergarten. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 113–124.
38.
StillwellR.SableJ.PlottsC. (2011). Public school graduates and dropouts from the common core of data: School year 2008–09 (NCES 2011-312). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch
39.
TawneyJ. W.GastD. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing.
40.
TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 276–286.
41.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.LaughonP.SimmonsK.RashotteC. A. (1993). Development of young readers’ phonological processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 83–103.
42.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
43.
WoodcockR. W. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test–Revised/Normative Update. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
