One of the field’s most enduring problems is the overrepresentation of students of color in special education. A less acknowledged challenge is the overrepresentation of students with disabilities in juvenile incarceration. Quantitative studies have documented the overrepresentation of students with disabilities in juvenile justice. Yet, little is known about the education they receive once they become incarcerated. This qualitative study examined the education of 10 young women of color labeled with emotional disabilities in the School-to-Prison Pipeline. Through in-depth interviews and observations, this study explored the following questions: (a) What processes and practices impact juvenile incarceration education for students with historically marginalized identities (e.g., disability, gender, race, culture)? (b) How is the education of young women of color with disabilities affected by these processes and practices? Findings illustrate how socializing processes and practices aimed at control and compliance constrain education in juvenile justice but also provide an opportunity to do better.
Advancement Project. (2010). Test, punish, and push out: How zero tolerance and high-stakes testing funnel youth into the school to prison pipeline. Washington, DC: Author.
AnnammaS. A. (2013). Undocumented and under surveillance: A case study of an undocumented Latina with a disability in juvenile justice. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal, 7(3), 32–41.
4.
AnnammaS. A.ConnorD.FerriB. (2013). Dis/ability Critical Race Studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 16, 1–31. doi:10.1080/13613324.2012.730511
5.
ArtilesA. J.TrentS. C.Hoffman-KippP.López-TorresL. (2000). From individual acquisition to cultural-historical practices in multicultural teacher education. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 79–89. doi:10.1177/074193250002100203
Chesney-LindM. (2010). Jailing “bad” girls: Girls’ violence and trends in female incarceration. In Chesney-LindM.JonesN. (Eds.), Fighting for girls: Critical perspectives on gender and violence (pp. 57–79). Albany: State University of New York Press.
8.
CollinsK. M. (2003). Ability profiling and school failure. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
ConnorD. J. (2008). Urban narratives: Portraits-in-progress: Life at the intersections of learning disability, race, and social class. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
10.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.
11.
CrenshawK.GotandaN.PellerG.ThomasK. (1995). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. New York, NY: The New Press.
12.
DarensbourgA.PerezE.BlakeJ. J. (2010). Overrepresentation of African American males in exclusionary discipline: The role of school-based mental health professionals in dismantling the School to Prison Pipeline. Journal of African American Males in Education, 1(3), 196–211.
13.
DeCataldoK. R.LangT. A. (Eds). (2012, March). Keeping kids in school and out of court. A collection of reports to inform the National Leadership Summit on School Justice Partnerships, New York City.
14.
DelgadoR.StefancicJ. (2001). Critical race theory: An introduction. New York: New York University Press.
15.
DelpitL. D. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: The New Press.
16.
Duncan-AndradeJ. M. R.MorrellE. (2008). The art of critical pedagogy: Possibilities for moving from theory to practice in urban schools. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
17.
EricksonF. (1996). Inclusion into what? Thoughts on the construction of learning, identity and affiliation in the general education classroom. In SpeeceD.KeoghB. (Eds.), Research on classroom ecologies: Implications for inclusion of children with learning disabilities (pp. 91–105). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
EricksonF. (1998). Qualitative research methods for science education. In FraserB. J.TobinK. G. (Eds.), International handbook on science education (pp. 1155–1173). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19.
FergusonA. A. (2000). Bad boys: Public schools in the making of Black masculinity. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
20.
FerriB.ConnorD. (2009). “I was the special ed girl”: (En)gendering disability from the standpoint of urban working class young women of color. Journal of Gender and Education, 22, 105–121. doi:10.1080/09540250802612688
21.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage.
22.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
23.
GoodwinM. (2003). Gender, race, and mental illness: The case of Wanda Jean Allen. In WingA. K. (Ed.), Critical race feminism: A reader (pp. 228–237). New York: New York University Press.
24.
GregoryA.RipskiM. (2008). Adolescent trust in teachers: Implications for behavior in the high school classroom. School Psychology Review, 37, 337–353.
25.
GutiérrezK.LarsonJ. (1994). Language borders: Recitation as hegemonic discourse. International Journal of Education Reform, 3, 22–36.
26.
GutiérrezK. D.HunterJ. D.ArzubiagaA. (2009). Re-mediating the university: Learning through sociocritical literacies. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(1), 1–23.
27.
GutiérrezK. D.RogoffB. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.
28.
HarryB.KlingnerJ. (2006). Why are so many minority students in special education?New York, NY: Teachers College.
29.
HouchinsD. E.ShippenM. E. (2012). Welcome to a special issue about the School-to-Prison Pipeline: The pathway to modern institutionalization. Teacher Education and Special Education, 35, 265–270. doi:10.1177/0888406412462141.
30.
JonesN. (2009). Between good and ghetto: African American girls and inner-city violence. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
31.
KargerJ.RoseD. H.BoundyK. B. (2012). Applying universal design for learning to the education of youth in detention and juvenile corrections. In BahenaS.CoocN.Currie-RubinR.NgM. (Eds.), Disrupting the School-to-Prison Pipeline (pp. 119–143). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Review.
32.
KatsiaficasD.FutchV. A.FineM.SelcukS. (2011). Everyday hyphens: Exploring youth identities with methodological and analytic pluralism. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 8, 120–139. doi:10.1080/14780887.2011.572743
33.
KimC.LosenD.HewittD. (2010). The School-to-Prison Pipeline: Structuring legal reform. New York: New York University Press.
34.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 465–491. doi:10.3102/00028312032003465
35.
LosenD. J.SkibaR. J. (2010). Suspended education: Urban middle schools in crisis. Montgomery, AL: Southern Poverty Law Center.
36.
MalesM. (2010). Have “girls gone wild”? In Chesney-LindM.JonesN. (Eds.), Fighting for girls: Critical perspectives on gender and violence (pp. 13–32). Albany: State University of New York Press.
37.
MatsudaM. (1987). Looking to the bottom: Critical legal studies and reparations. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 22, 323–399.
38.
MearsD. P.AronL. Y. (2003). Addressing the needs of youth with disabilities in the juvenile justice system: The current state of knowledge. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/publications/410885.html
39.
MeinersE. R. (2007). Right to be hostile: Schools, prisons, and the making of public enemies. New York, NY: Routledge.
40.
Merleau-PontyM. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception: An Introduction. Paris, France: Gallimard.
41.
MollL. C.AmantiC.NeffD.GonzalezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132–141.
42.
OsherD.WoodruffD.SimsA. E. (2002). School makes a difference: The overrepresentation of African American youth in special education and the juvenile justice system. In LosenD. J.OrfieldG. (Eds.), Racial inequity in special education (pp. 93–116). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
43.
OswaldD. P.BestA. M.CoutinhoM. J.NagleH. A. (2003). Trends in the special education identification rates of boys and girls: A call for research and change. Exceptionality, 11, 223–237. doi:10.1207/S15327035EX1104_3
44.
OswaldD. P.CoutinhoM. J.BestA. M. (2002). Community and school predictors of overrepresentation of minority children in special education. In LosenD.OrfieldG. (Eds.), Racial inequality in special education (1–13). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
45.
PowellJ. A. (2001). Minority-majority nation: Racing the population in the twenty-first century. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 29, 1395–1415.
46.
QuinnM. M.RutherfordR. B.LeoneP. E.OsherD. M.PoirierJ. M. (2005). Youth with disabilities in juvenile corrections: A national survey. Exceptional Children, 71, 339–345.
47.
RabakaR. (2010). Against epistemic apartheid: W.E.B. Du Bois and the disciplinary decadence of sociology. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
RiosV. M. (2011). Punished: Policing the lives of Black and Latino boys. New York: New York University Press.
50.
SeidmanI. E. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
51.
SheetsR. H. (2002). “You’re just a kid that’s there”-Chicano perception of disciplinary events. Journal of Latinos and Education, 1, 105–122. doi:10.1207/S1532771XJLE0102_3
52.
ShippenM. E.PattersonD.GreenK. L.SmithermanT. (2012). Community and school practices to reduce delinquent behavior intervening on the School-to-Prison Pipeline. Teacher Education and Special Education, 35, 296–308. doi:10.1177/0888406412445930
53.
ShulmanL. S. (1999). Professing educational scholarship. In LagemannE. C.ShulmanL. S. (Eds.), Issues in educational research: Problems and possibilities (pp. 159–165). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
54.
SolórzanoD. G.BernalD. D. (2001). Examining transformational resistance through a critical race and LatCrit theory framework: Chicana and Chicano students in an urban context. Urban Education, 36, 308–342. doi:10.1177/0042085901363002
55.
SolórzanoD. G.YossoT. J. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8, 23–44. doi:10.1177/1077800402008001003
56.
VaughtS. (2012). Institutional racist melancholia: A structural understanding of grief and power in schooling. In BahenaS.CoocN.Currie-RubinR.NgM. (Eds.), Disrupting the School-to-Prison Pipeline (pp. 150–174). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Review.
57.
WalkerB. L. T. (2012). Teacher education and African American males deconstructing pathways from the schoolhouse to the “Big House.”Teacher Education and Special Education, 35, 320–332. doi:10.1177/0888406412461158
58.
WattsI. E.ErevellesN. (2004). These deadly times: Reconceptualizing school violence by using critical race theory and disability studies. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 271–299. doi:10.3102/00028312041002271
59.
WillenS. S. (2007). Toward a critical phenomenology of “illegality”: State power, criminalization, and objectivity among undocumented migrant workers in Tel Aviv, Israel. International Migration, 45(3), 8–38. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2435.2007.00409.x
60.
WingA. (Ed.). (2003). Global critical race feminism: An international reader. New York: New York University Press.
61.
WinnM. T. (2010). “Our side of the story”: Moving incarcerated youth voices from margins to center. Race Ethnicity and Education, 13, 313–325.
62.
WinnM. T. (2011). Girl time: Literacy, justice, and the School-to-Prison Pipeline. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
63.
YoungM.PhillipsR.NasirN. (2010). Schooling in a youth prison. Journal of Correctional Education, 61, 203–222.
