A statewide survey of coordinators of inclusive high school service-learning programs was conducted to validate elements, methods, and barriers to including students with and without disabilities in service-learning. Surveys were mailed to 655 service-learning coordinators; 190 (29%) returned a completed survey. Findings support the validity of the elements and methods. Respondents consistently rated the elements and methods higher in importance than actual use. Few barriers were identified although some individual respondents reported extreme barriers. Lack of money and time to co-plan were the greatest barriers shared across respondents. School size, presence of a service-learning graduation requirement, and inclusion of students with intellectual disability did not account for significant differences among service-learning coordinators.
AgranM.BlanchardC.WehmeyerM. L. (2000). Promoting transition goals and self-determination through student self-directed learning: The self-determined learning model of instruction. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 351–364.
2.
Alliance for Service-Learning in Education Reform. (1995, March). Standards of quality for school-based and community-based service-learning. Alexandria, VA: Close Up Foundation.
3.
AlreckP.SettleR. B. (2003). The survey research handbook (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
4.
BrabantM.BraidD. (2009). The devil is in the details: Defining civic engagement. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 13, 59–87.
5.
CarterE. W.OwensL.TrainorA. A.SunY.SwedeenB. (2009). Self-determination skills and opportunities of adolescents with severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 114, 179–192. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-114.3.179
6.
CarterE. W.SiscoL. G.BrownL.BrickhamD.Al-KhabbazZ. A. (2008). Peer interactions and academic engagement of youth with developmental disabilities in inclusive middle and high school classrooms. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 113, 479–494. doi:10.1352/2008.113:479-494
7.
ColadarciT.CobbC.MiniumE.ClarkeR. (2004). Fundamentals of statistical reasoning in education. New York, NY: John Wiley.
8.
DymondS. K.RenzagliaA.ChunE. J. (2007). Elements of effective high school service learning programs that include students with and without disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 227–243. doi:10.1177/07419325070280040301
9.
DymondS. K.RenzagliaA.ChunE. J. (2008a). Elements of high school service learning programs. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 37–47. doi:10.1177/0885728807312921
10.
DymondS. K.RenzagliaA.ChunE. J. (2008b). Inclusive high school service learning programs: Methods for and barriers to including students with disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43, 20–36.
11.
DymondS. K.RenzagliaA.SlagorM. (2011). Trends in the use of service learning with students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 32, 219–229. doi:10.1177/0741932510362173
12.
EylerJ.GilesD. E. (1999). Where’s the learning in service-learning?San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
FurcoA. (2003). Issues of definition and program diversity in the study of service-learning. In BilligS. H.WatermanA. S. (Eds.), Studying service-learning, Innovations in education research methodology (pp. 13–33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
GentP. J. (2009). Great ideas: Using service-learning and differentiated instruction to help your students succeed. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
15.
GiangrecoM. F. (2006). Foundational concepts and practices for educating students with severe disabilities. In SnellM. E.BrownF. (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (6th ed., pp. 1–27). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
16.
HendersonA.BrownS. D.PancerS. M.Ellis-HaleK. (2007). Mandated community service in high school and subsequent civic engagement: The case of the “double cohort” in Ontario, Canada. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 849–860. doi:10.1007/s10964-007-9207-1
17.
HonnetE. P.PoulsenS. J. (1989). Principles of good practice for combining service and learning. Racine, WI: The Johnson Foundation.
18.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) of 2004, P.L. 108-446, 108th Congress (2004).
19.
KimR.DymondS. K. (2010). Special education teachers’ perceptions of benefits, barriers, and components of community-based vocational instruction. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 313–329. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-48.5.313
20.
LeeV. E.SmerdonB. A.Alfeld-LireC.BrownS. L. (2000). Inside large and small high schools: Curriculum and social relations. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 147–171. doi:10.3102/01623737022002147
21.
LoganK. R.KeefeE. B. (1997). A comparison of instructional context, teacher behavior, and engaged behavior for students with severe disabilities in general education and self-contained elementary classrooms. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 22, 16–27.
22.
McDonnellJ.HardmanM. L. (2010). Successful transition programs: Pathways for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
23.
MillerC. R.HinterlongJ.GreenA. D. (2010). Service learning and students with disabilities: Perspectives from a statewide model program in Florida. School Social Work Journal, 34, 71–89.
24.
MonkD. H.HallerE. I. (1993). Predictors of high school academic course offerings: The role of school size. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 3–21. doi:10.3102/00028312030001003
25.
National Service-Learning Cooperative. (1999). Essential elements of service-learning. St. Paul, MN: National Youth Leadership Council.
26.
National Youth Leadership Council. (2008). K-12 service-learning standards for quality practice. St. Paul, MN: Author. Available from www.nylc.org
27.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P.L. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
28.
NoletV.McLaughlinM. J. (2005). Accessing the general curriculum: Including students with disabilities in standards-based reform (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
29.
NunnallyJ. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
30.
PritchardF. F.WhiteheadG. I. (2004). Serve and learn: Implementing and evaluating service-learning in middle and high schools. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
SheffieldE. C. (2005). Service in service-learning education: The need for philosophical understanding. High School Journal, 89, 46–53. doi:10.1353/hsj.2005.0018
32.
SkinnerR.ChapmanC. (1999, September). Service-learning and community service in K-12 public schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.
33.
SnellM. E.BrownF. (2006). Instruction of students with severe disabilities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
34.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. (2006). Individuals with Disabilities Act Data. Table 1-7: Children and students served under IDEA, Part B, in the U.S. and outlying areas, by age and disability category. Retrieved from https://www.ideadata.org/arc_toc8.asp#partbCC
35.
WallaceT.AndersonA. R.BartholomayT.HuppS. (2002). An ecobehavioral examination of high school classrooms that include students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 68, 345–359.
36.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.LeeY.Williams-DiehmK.ShogrenK. (2011). A randomized-trial evaluation of the effect of whose future is it anyway on self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 34, 45–56. doi:10.1177/0885728810383559
