CampbellJ. (2013). Commentary on PND at 25. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 20–25.
2.
CroneD.HornerR.HawkenL. (2004). Responding to problem behavior in schools: The Behavior Education Program. New York, NY: Guilford.
3.
ElliottS. N.GreshamF. M. (2007). Social skills improvement system: Classwide intervention program. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.
4.
FuchsD.FuchsL. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93–99. doi:10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4
5.
GerstenR.FuchsL. S.ComptonD.CoyneM.GreenwoodC.InnocentiM. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149–164.
6.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS. L.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practices in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
7.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004) (Reauthorization of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of 1990).
8.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ. H.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 26–38.
9.
LaneK. L.OakesW. P.MenziesH. M. (2010). Systematic screenings to prevent the development of learning and behavior problems: Considerations for practitioners, researchers, and policy makers. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 21, 160–172. doi:10.1177/1044207310379123
10.
MagginD. M.BrieschA. M.ChafouleasS. M. (2013). An application of the What Works Clearinghouse standards for evaluating single-subject research: Synthesis of the self-management literature base. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 44–58. doi:10.1177/0741932511435176
11.
MooneyP.EpsteinM. H.ReidR.NelsonR. (2003). Status of trends in academic intervention research for students with emotional disturbance. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 273–287. doi: 10.1177/07419325030240050301
12.
OdomS. L.BrantlingerE.GerstenR.HornerR. H.ThompsonB.HarrisK. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137–148.
13.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (2013). PND at 25: Past, present, and future trends in summarizing single-subject research. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 9–19.
14.
ShavelsonR. J.TowneL. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
15.
SpoonerF.KnightV. F.BrowderD. M.SmithB. R. (2012). Evidence-based practice for teaching academics to students with severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 374–387.
16.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2006). A promising approach for expanding and sustaining school-wide positive behavior support. School Psychology Review, 35, 245–260.
17.
TincaniM.DevisK. (2011). Quantitative synthesis and component analysis of single-participant studies on the Picture Exchange Communication System. Remedial and Special Education, 32, 458–470. doi:10.1177/0741932510362494
18.
TurnbullH. R.TurnbullA. P.WehmeyerM. L.ParkJ. (2003). A quality of life framework for special education outcomes. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 67–74. doi:10.1177/07419325030240020201
19.
UmbreitJ.FerroJ.LiaupsinC.LaneK. (2007). Functional behavioral assessment and function-based intervention: An effective, practical approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20.
WehmeyerM. L.AberyB. H.ZhangD.WardK.WillisD.HossainW. A. . . . WalkerH. M. (2011). Personal self-determination and moderating variables that impact efforts to promote self-determination. Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal, 19, 19–30.
21.
WoleryM.BusickM.ReichowB.BartonE. E. (2010). Comparison of overlap methods for quantitatively synthesizing single-subject data. Journal of Special Education, 44, 18–28. doi:10.1177/0022466908328009
22.
ZorigianK.LaneK. L.CarterE. W. (2012). Motivation and self-determination among secondary students. Manuscript in preparation.