The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of a repeated reading and question generation intervention entitled Re-read-Adapt and Answer-Comprehend (RAAC) with a modified RAAC intervention without the repeated reading component. The sample included 30 students in Grades 3 through 5. The students received services in reading within a three-tiered response to intervention framework or in special education. Students were randomly assigned to the nonrepetitive condition or the control repeated reading condition and participated in 50 intervention sessions over a 4-month period. Regardless of condition, all students made gains in oral reading fluency on independent passages. The modified RAAC program without passage repetition appeared to be as effective if not more so at increasing reading fluency when compared to the RAAC program with passage repetition.
BlackP.WiliamD. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5, 7-74. doi:10.1080/096959598005010810.1080/0969595980050108
2.
BryantD.VaughnS.Linan-ThompsonS.UgelN.HamffA.HougenM. (2000). Reading outcomes for students with and without reading disabilities in general education middle-school content area classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 238-252. doi:10.2307/151134710.2307/1511347
3.
Council of Administrators of Special Education & Spectrum K12 School Solutions. (2009). Response to Intervention (RTI) adoption survey. Retrieved from http://www.spectrumK12.com
4.
DaveyB.McBrideS. (1986). Generating self-questions after reading: A comprehension assist for elementary students. Journal of Educational Research, 80, 43–46.
5.
DenoS. L.FuchsL. S.MarstonD.ShinJ. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 507–524.
6.
FeldtL. S. (1993). Design and analysis in the behavioral sciences. Iowa: University of Iowa Press.
7.
FleschR. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221-233. doi:10.1037/h005753210.1037/h0057532
8.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (1999). Monitoring student progress toward the development of reading competence: A review of three forms of classroom-based assessment. School Psychology Review, 28, 659–671.
9.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HospM. K.JenkinsJ. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239-256. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503310.1207/S1532799XSSR05033
10.
GilbertL.WilliamsR.McLaughlinT. (1996). Use of assisted reading to increase correct reading rates and decrease error rates of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 255-257. doi:10.1901/jaba.1996.29-25510.1901/jaba.1996.29-255
11.
GoffredaC. T.DiPernaJ. C. (2010). An empirical review of psychometric evidence for the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills. School Psychology Review, 39, 463–483.
12.
HasbrouckJ.TindalG. (1992). Curriculum-based oral reading fluency norms for students in grades 2 through 5. Teaching Exceptional Children, 24(3), 41–44.
13.
HasbrouckJ. E.TindalG. (2005). Oral reading fluency: 90 years of measurement (Technical Report No. 33). Eugene: University of Oregon, College of Education, Behavioral Research and Teaching.
14.
HomanS. P.KlesiusJ. P.HiteC. (1993). Effects of repeated readings and nonrepetitive strategies on students’ fluency and comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 94-99. doi:10.1080/00220671.1993.994117210.1080/00220671.1993.9941172
15.
Iowa Department of Education. (2006). Special education eligibility standards. Des Moines: State of Iowa Department of Education.
16.
KuhnM. R.StahlS. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3-21. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.310.1037/0022-0663.95.1.3
17.
LaBergeD.SamuelsS. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-210.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2
18.
LevyB.AbelloB.LysynchukL. (1997). Transfer from word training to reading in context: Gains in reading fluency and comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 173-188. doi:10.2307/151130710.2307/1511307
19.
LyonG. R.MoatsL. C. (1997). Critical conceptual and methodological considerations in reading intervention research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 578-588. doi:10.1177/00222194970300060110.1177/002221949703000601
20.
MarstonD. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it? In ShinnM. R. (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18–78). New York, NY: Guilford.
21.
NagyW. E.AndersonR. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English?Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304-329. doi:10.2307/74782310.2307/747823
22.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
23.
O’ConnorR.WhiteA.SwansonH. (2007). Repeated reading versus continuous reading: Influences on reading fluency and comprehension. Exceptional Children, 74, 31–46.
24.
O’SheaL. J.SindelarP. T.O’SheaD. J. (1985). The effects of repeated readings and attentional cues on reading fluency and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17, 129-141. doi:10.1080/1086296850954753510.1080/10862968509547535
25.
PressleyM. (2006, April29). What the future of reading research could be. Paper presented at the International Reading Association’s Reading Research 2006, Chicago, Illinois.
26.
RashotteC.TorgesenJ. (1985). Repeated reading and reading fluency in learning disabled children. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 180-188. doi:10.1598/RRQ.20.2.410.1598/RRQ.20.2.4
27.
RasinskiT. V.PadakN.LinekW.SturtevantE. (1994). Effects of fluency development on urban second-grade readers. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 158-165. doi:10.1080/00220671.1994.994123710.1080/00220671.1994.9941237
28.
RosenshineB.MeisterC.ChapmanS. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181-221. doi:10.2307/117060710.2307/1170607
29.
SalviaJ.YsseldykeJ.BoltS. (2010). Assessment in special and inclusive education (11th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
30.
SamuelsS. (1979). The method of repeated readings. Reading Teacher, 32, 403–408.
31.
ShapiroB.ChurchR.LewisM. (2002). Specific learning disabilities. In BatshawM. L. (Ed.), Children with disabilities (5th ed., pp. 417–442). Washington, DC: Paul H. Brookes.
32.
SchirmerB. R.SchafferL.TherrienW. J.SchirmerT. N. (in press). Reread-Adapt and Answer-Comprehend intervention with deaf readers: Effect on fluency and reading achievement. American Annals of the Deaf.
33.
SchirmerB. R.TherrienW. J.SchafferL.SchirmerT. N. (2009). Repeated reading as an instructional intervention with deaf readers: Effect on fluency and reading achievement. Reading Improvement, 46, 168–177.
34.
ShortE.RyanE. (1984). Metacognitive differences between skilled and less-skilled readers: Remediating deficits through story grammar and attribution training. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 225-235. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.2.22510.1037/0022-0663.76.2.225
35.
SimmonsD.FuchsD.FuchsL.HodgeJ.MathesP. (1994). Importance of instructional complexity and role reciprocity to classwide peer tutoring. Learning Disability Research and Practice, 9, 203–212.
36.
SindelarP. T.MondaL. E.O’SheaL. J. (1990). Effects of repeated readings on instructional- and mastery-level readers. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 220–226.
37.
StoddardK.ValcanteG.SindelarP.O’SheaL.AlgozzineB. (1993). Increasing reading rate and comprehension: The effects of repeated readings, sentence segmentation, and intonation training. Reading Research and Instruction, 32(4), 53–65. doi:10.1080/1938807930955813310.1080/19388079309558133
38.
TherrienW. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 252–261. doi:10.1177/0741932504025004080110.1177/07419325040250040801
39.
TherrienW. J.GormleyS.KubinaR. (2006a). Boosting fluency and comprehension to improve reading achievement. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(3), 22–26.
40.
TherrienW. J.Gormley-BudinS. (2008). Effects of the Reread-Adapt and Answer-Comprehend (RAAC) intervention on the reading achievement of students with reading and behavioral difficulties. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15, 33-38.
41.
TherrienW. J.WickstromK.JonesK. (2006b). Effect of a combined repeated reading and question generation intervention on reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 21, 89-97. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2006.0020910.1111/j.1540-5826.2006.00209
42.
United States Department of Education. (2005). NAEP 2005 Assessment Results (Internet). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
43.
United States Office of Special Education Programs. (2009). National Center on Student Progress Monitoring. Retrieved from http://www.studentprogress.org/.
44.
University of Oregon. (2009). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS): Oral Reading Fluency. Retrieved from https://dibels.uoregon.edu/dibelsinfo.php
45.
Van BonW. H.BoksebeldL. M.Font FreideT. A.Van den HurkA. J. (1991). A comparison of three methods of reading-while-listening. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 471-476. doi:10.1177/00222194910240080510.1177/002221949102400805
46.
VaughnS.BosC.SchummJ. (2007). Teaching students who are exceptional, diverse, and at risk: In the general education classroom (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
47.
VaughnS.ChardD. J.BryantD. P.ColemanM.TylerB.Linan-ThompsonS.KouzekananiK. (2000). Fluency and comprehension interventions for third-grade students. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 325-335. doi:10.1177/07419325000210060210.1177/074193250002100602
48.
WoodcockR.McGrewK.MatherN. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
