This article critiques the treatment of disability as cultural difference by the theorists of the “social model” and “minority group model” of disability. Both models include all of the various disabling conditions under one term—disability—and fail to distinguish disabilities from cultural differences (e.g., race, ethnicity, or gender differences). Equating disability with cultural difference, they adopt a political strategy of positive identity similar to that used in other civil rights movements. The consequences of this strategy for the disability movement and special education are discussed.
AbberleyP. (1987). The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability. Disability, Handicap & Society, 2, 5–20. doi:10.1080/0267464876678002110.1080/02674648766780021
2.
AnastasiouD.GardnerR.IIIMichailD. (in press). Ethnicity and disability. In KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Handbook of special education. New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
AnastasiouD.KauffmanJ. M. (2009). When special education goes to the marketplace: The case of vouchers. Exceptionality, 17, 205–222. doi:10.1080/0936283090323210910.1080/09362830903232109
4.
AnastasiouD.KauffmanJ. M. (in press-a). A social constructionist approach to disability: Implications for special education. Exceptional Children.
5.
AnastasiouD.KauffmanJ. M. (in press-b). The social model of disability: Dichotomy between impairment and disability. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy.
6.
AnastasiouD.KellerC. (in press). International differences in provision for exceptional learners. In KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Handbook of special education. New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
BamshadM. J.OlsonS. E. (2003). Does race exist?Scientific American, 289(6), 78–85. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1203-7810.1038/scientificamerican1203-78
8.
BarbujaniG.MagagniA.MinchE.Cavalli-SforzaL. L. (1997). An apportionment of human DNA diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 94, 4516–4519. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.9.451610.1073/pnas.94.9.4516
9.
BarnesC. (1991). Disabled people in Britain and discrimination. London, UK: Hurst.
10.
BatemanB. D. (in press). Individual education programs for children with disabilities. In KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Handbook of special education. New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
BatemanB. D.LindenM. A. (2006). Better IEPs: How to develop legally correct and educationally useful programs (4th ed.). Verona, WI: Attainment.
12.
BaumanZ. (1994). Alone again: Ethics after certainty. London, UK: Demos.
13.
BayerR.SpitzerR. L. (1982). Edited correspondence on the status of homosexuality in DSM-III. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 18, 32–52. doi:10.1002/1520-6696(198201)18:1<32::AID-JHBS2300180105>3.0.CO;2-010.1002/1520-6696(198201)18:1<32::AID-JHBS2300180105>3.0.CO;2-0
14.
BrighamF. J.KauffmanJ. M. (1998). Creating supportive environments for students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Effective School Practices, 17(2), 25–35.
15.
BungeM. (1999). Social science under debate. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
16.
BungeM. (2006). Chasing reality: Strife over realism. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
17.
BungeM.MahnerM. (2001). Selected essays of Mario Bunge: Scientific realism. New York, NY: Prometheus Book.
18.
CoutinhoM. J.OswaldD. P. (in press). Gender and exceptionality. In KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Handbook of special education. New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
DanermarkB.Coniavitis GellerstendtL. C. (2004). Social justice: Redistribution and recognition—A non-reductionist perspective on disability. Disability & Society, 19, 339–353. doi:10.1080/0968759041000168945810.1080/09687590410001689458
ErkulwaterJ. L. (2006). Disability rights and the American social safety net. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
22.
FinkelsteinV. (1980). Attitudes and disabled people. New York, NY: World Rehabilitation Fund.
23.
FraserN. (1995). From recognition to redistribution? Dilemmas of justice in a “post-socialist” age. New Left Review, 212, 68–93.
24.
FraserN. (2000). Rethinking recognition. New Left Review, 3, 107–120.
25.
FrenchS. (1993). Disability, impairment or something in between. In SwainJ.FinkelsteinV.FrenchS.OliverM. (Eds.), Disabling barriers, enabling environments (pp. 17–25). London, UK: Sage.
26.
GladwellM. (1997, May19). The sports taboo: Why Blacks are like boys and Whites are like girls. New Yorker, pp. 50–55.
27.
GlionaM. F.GonzalesA. K.JacobsonE. S. (2005). Dedicated, not segregated: Suggested changes in thinking about instructional environments and in the language of special education. In KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), The illusion of full inclusion: A comprehensive critique of a current special education bandwagon (2nd ed., pp. 135–146). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Gould, S. J. (1996a). Full house: The spread of excellence from Plato to Darwin. New York, NY: Harmony.
28.
GouldS. J. (1996b). The mismeasure of man (Rev. exp. ed.). New York, NY: Penguin.
29.
HahnH. (1985). Disability policy and the problem of discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 3, 293–318. doi:10.1177/00027648502800300210.1177/000276485028003002
30.
HahnH. (1986). Public support for rehabilitation programs: The analysis of US disability policy. Disability, Handicap & Society, 1, 121–137. doi:10.1080/0267464866678013110.1080/02674648666780131
31.
HahnH. (1989). The politics of special education. In LipskyD. K.GartnerA. (Eds.), Beyond separate education: Quality education for all (pp. 225–241). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
32.
HallahanD. P.KauffmanJ. M. (1994). Toward a culture of disability in the aftermath of Deno and Dunn. Journal of Special Education, 27, 496–508. doi:10.1177/00224669940270040910.1177/002246699402700409
33.
HallahanD. P.KauffmanJ. M.PullenP. C. (2009). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
34.
HallenbeckB. A.KauffmanJ. M. (1996). Constructing habilitative environments for students with emotional or behavioral disorders: Conclusion to the special issue. Canadian Journal of Special Education, 11(1), 100–108.
35.
HarrisJ. (2000). Is there a coherent social conception of disability?Journal of Medical Ethics, 26, 95–100. doi:10.1136/jme.26.2.9510.1136/jme.26.2.95
36.
HarrisJ. (2002). One principle and a fourth fallacy of disability studies. Journal of Medical Ethics, 28, 204. doi:10.1136/jme.28.3.20410.1136/jme.28.3.204
37.
HarveyD. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38.
HerrnsteinR. J.MurrayC. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York, NY: Free Press.
39.
KauffmanJ. M. (1999). What we make of difference and the difference we make. In SchweanV. L.SaklofskeD. H. (Eds.), Handbook of psychosocial characteristics of exceptional children (pp. ix–xiii). New York, NY: Plenum.
40.
KauffmanJ. M. (2002). Education deform: Bright people sometimes say stupid things about education. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
41.
KauffmanJ. M. (2005). Waving to Ray Charles: Missing the meaning of disability. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 520–521, 524.
42.
KauffmanJ. M. (2008). Special education. In GoodT. L. (Ed.), 21st Century education: A reference handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 405–413). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
KauffmanJ. M. (in press). Science and rogue science in education. Verona, WI: Attainment.
44.
KauffmanJ. M.BantzJ.McCulloughJ. (2002). Separate and better: A special public school class for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptionality, 10, 149–170. doi:10.1207/S15327035EX1003_110.1207/S15327035EX1003_1
45.
KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P. (Eds.). (2005a). The illusion of full inclusion: A comprehensive critique of a current special education bandwagon (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
46.
KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P. (2005b). Special education: What it is and why we need it. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
47.
KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P. (2009). Parental choices and ethical dilemmas involving disabilities: Special education and the problem of deliberately chosen disabilities. Exceptionality, 17, 45–62. doi:10.1080/0936283080266783510.1080/09362830802667835
48.
KauffmanJ. M.HungL. Y. (2009). Special education for intellectual disability: Current trends and perspectives. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 22, 452–456. doi:10.1097/YCO.0b013e32832eb5c310.1097/YCO.0b013e32832eb5c3
49.
KauffmanJ. M.KonoldT. R. (2007). Making sense in education: Pretense (including NCLB) and realities in rhetoric and policy about schools and schooling. Exceptionality, 15, 75–96.
50.
KauffmanJ. M.LandrumT. J. (2009). Politics, civil rights, and disproportional identification of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptionality, 17, 177–188. doi:10.1080/0936283090323190310.1080/09362830903231903
51.
KauffmanJ. M.LloydJ. W. (in press). Statistics, data, and special education decisions: Basic links to realities. In KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Handbook of special education. New York, NY: Routledge.
52.
KauffmanJ. M.LloydJ. W.BakerJ.RiedelT. M. (1995). Inclusion of all students with emotional or behavioral disorders? Let’s think again. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 542–546.
53.
KauffmanJ. M.NelsonC. M.SimpsonR. L.MockD. R. (in press). Contemporary issues. In KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Handbook of special education. New York, NY: Routledge.
54.
LewontinR. (1972). The apportionment of human diversity. Evolutionary Biology, 6, 381–398.
55.
LewontinR. (1995). Human diversity. New York, NY: Scientific American Library.
56.
LewontinR.LevinsR. (2007). Biology under the influence: Dialectical essays on ecology, agriculture, and health. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
57.
LiggettH. (1988). Stars are not born: an interactive approach to the politics of disability. Disability, Handicap & Society, 3, 263–275. doi:10.1080/0267464886678026110.1080/02674648866780261
58.
LipskyD. K.GartnerA. (1996). Inclusion and school reform: Transforming America’s classrooms. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
59.
LowC. (2006). Some ideologies of disability. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 6, 108–111. doi:10.1111/j.1471-3802.2006.00066.x10.1111/j.1471-3802.2006.00066.x
60.
MarxK. (1959). Theses on Feuerbach. In FeuerL. S. (Ed.), Marx and Engels: Basic writings on politics and philosophy (pp. 283–286). New York, NY: Lewis S. Feuer.
61.
McKayG. (2002). The disappearance of disability? Thoughts on a changing culture. British Journal of Special Education, 29, 159–163. doi:10.1111/1467-8527.0026310.1111/1467-8527.00263
62.
NeimanS. (2008). Moral clarity: A guide for grown-up idealists. New York, NY: Harcourt.
63.
NeisserU.BoodooG.BouchardT. J.BoykinA. W.BrodyN.CeciS. J.. . . UrbinaS. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77–101. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.7710.1037/0003-066X.51.2.77
64.
NiiniluotoI. (1999). Critical scientific realism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
65.
OliverM. (1989). Conductive education: If it wasn’t so sad it would be funny. Disability, Handicap & Society, 4, 197–200. doi:10.1080/0267464896678019110.1080/02674648966780191
66.
OliverM. (1990). The politics of disablement. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
67.
OliverM. (1991). Multispecialist and multidisciplinary a recipe for confusion? “Too many cooks spoil the broth.”Disability, Handicap & Society, 6, 65–68. doi:10.1080/0267464916678005110.1080/02674649166780051
68.
OliverM. (1992). Changing the social relations of research production?Disability, Handicap & Society, 7, 101–114. doi:10.1080/0267464926678014110.1080/02674649266780141
69.
OliverM. (1993). Disability and dependency: A creation of industrial societies. In SwainJ.FinkelsteinV.FrenchS.OliverM. (Eds.), Disabling barriers, enabling environments (pp. 49–60). London, UK: Sage.
70.
OliverM. (1996a). A sociology of disability or a disablist sociology. In BartonL. (Ed.), Disability and society: Emerging issues and insights (pp. 18–42). Harlow, UK: Longman.
71.
OliverM. (1996b). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
72.
OliverM. (2000, July). Decoupling education policy from the economy in late capitalist societies: Some implications for special education. Paper presented at the International Special Education Congress, Manchester, UK. Retrieved from http://www.isec2000.org.uk/abstracts/keynotes/oliver.htm
73.
OliverM.ZarbG. (1989). The politics of disability: a new approach. Disability, Handicap & Society, 4, 221–239. doi:10.1080/0267464896678026110.1080/02674648966780261
74.
RozalskiM.MillerJ.StewartA. (in press). Least restrictive environment. In KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Handbook of special education. New York, NY: Routledge.
75.
ShakespeareT. W. (1993). Disabled people’s self-organization: A new social movement. Disability, Handicap & Society, 8, 249–264. doi:10.1080/0267464936678026110.1080/02674649366780261
76.
ShakespeareT. W. (2006). Disability rights and wrongs. London, UK: Routledge.
77.
ShapiroJ. P. (1993). No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. New York, NY: Time Books.
78.
SilversA. (1994). “Defective” agents: Equality, difference and the tyranny of the normal. Journal of Social Philosophy, 25, 154–175. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.1994.tb00353.x10.1111/j.1467-9833.1994.tb00353.x
79.
SkrticT. (1991). The special education paradox: Equity as the way to excellence. Harvard Educational Review, 61, 148–206.
80.
SmedleyA.SmedleyB. D. (2005). Race as biology is fiction, racism as a social problem is real. American Psychologist, 60, 16–25. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.1.1610.1037/0003-066X.60.1.16
81.
SparrowR. (2005). Defending deaf culture: The case of cochlear implants. Journal of Political Philosophy, 13, 135–152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.002110.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.0021
82.
StainbackW.StainbackS. (1991). A rationale for integration and restructuring: A synopsis. In LloydJ. W.SinghN. N.ReppA. C. (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 226–239). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
83.
SternbergR. J.GrigorenkoE. L.KiddK. K. (2005). Intelligence, race and genetics. American Psychologist, 60, 46–59. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.1.4610.1037/0003-066X.60.1.46
84.
TerziL. (2004). The social model of disability: A philosophical critique. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 21, 141–157. doi:10.1111/j.0264-3758.2004.00269.x10.1111/j.0264-3758.2004.00269.x
85.
WakefieldJ. C. (1992). The concept of mental disorder: On the boundary between biological facts and social values. American Psychologist, 47, 373–388. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.47.3.37310.1037/0003-066X.47.3.373
86.
WarnockM. (2005). Special educational needs: A new look (Impact No. 11). London, UK: Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain.
87.
WoodcockK. (1992). Cochlear implants vs. deaf culture. In GarretsonM. D. (Ed.), Viewpoints on deafness (Deaf American Monograph 42; pp. 151–155). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.
88.
ZigmondN. (2003). Where should students with disabilities receive special education services? Is one place better than another?Journal of Special Education, 37, 193–197. doi:10.1177/0022466903037003090110.1177/00224669030370030901
89.
ZigmondN.KlooA. (in press). General and special education are (and should be) different. In KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Handbook of special education. New York, NY: Routledge.
90.
ZolaI. K. (1982). Missing pieces: A chronicle of living with a disability. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
91.
ZolaI. K. (1989). Towards the necessary universalizing of a disability policy. Milbank Quarterly, 67(Suppl. 2), 401–428. doi:10.2307/335015110.2307/3350151
