Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis and treatment planning for children with autism are a growing concern. This study sought to address two questions: (a) Which domains of the of the Behavior Assessment System for Children (2nd ed.) Teacher Rating Scales (BASC-TRS) are most effective in discriminating students diagnosed with higher functioning autism from children and youth who do not have a disability or psychiatric diagnosis? and (b) Are there noteworthy differences in BASC-TRS domain scores between children and adolescents with autism? The results indicated that children and adolescents with an educational diagnosis of autism were given significantly higher ratings in the domains of Developmental Social Disorders and Withdrawal and significantly lower ratings in Functional Communication. These scales appear to discriminate best between those students with autism and their nondisabled peers. In addition, the results suggest that the differences between students with autism and students without clinical problems may become less pronounced as they grow into adolescence.

Keywords

identification assessment behavior autism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achenbach

T. M.

(2001). Child Behavior Checklist–Cross Informant Version. Available from Thomas Achenbach, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, 5 South Prospect St., Burlington, VT 05401.

American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author.

American Psychiatric Association. (n.d.). DSM-5 development. Retrieved from http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=94#

ASC-2 ASSIST Plus Scoring and Reporting Software [Computer Software] (2004). Minneapolis, MN: NSC Pearson.

Brock

S. E.

(2006). An examination of the changing rates of autism in special education. California School Psychologist, 11, 31–40.

Busse

R. T.

(2005). Rating scale applications within the problem-solving model. In Brown

(Ed.), Assessment for intervention: A problem-solving approach (pp. 200–218). New York, NY: Guilford.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Conners

C. K.

(1997). Conner’s Rating Sales–Revised: User’s manual. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.

Dahl

K. B.

(2003). The clinical and educational systems: Differences and similarities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18, 238–246.

10.

Fombonne

(2003). Epidemiological surveys of autism and other pervasive developmental disorders: An update. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 365–382.

11.

Gilliam

J. E.

(2001). Gilliam Asperger’s Disorder Scale (GADS). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

12.

Gilliam

J. E.

(2006). Gilliam Autism Rating Scale–Second edition (GARS-2). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

13.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004). Retrieved from http://idea.ed.gov

14.

Kogan

M. D.

Blumberg

S. J.

Schieve

L. A.

Boyle

C. A.

Perrin

J. M.

Ghandour

R. M.

. . . van Dyck

P. C.

(2009). Prevalence of parent-reported diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder among children in the US, 2007. Pediatrics, 124(4), 1–11.

15.

Lord

Rutter

DiLavore

P. C.

Risi

(1999). Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule–WPS (WPS ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

16.

Newsom

Hovanitz

(2006). Autistic spectrum disorders. In Mash

E. J.

Barkley

R. A.

(Eds.), Treatment of childhood disorders (pp. 455–511). New York, NY: Guilford.

17.

Ramsay

M. C.

Reynolds

C. R.

Kamphaus

R. W.

(2002). Essentials of behavioral assessment. New York, NY: John Wiley.

18.

Reynolds

C. R.

Kamphaus

R. W.

(2004). Behavior Assessment System for Children manual (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: AGS.

19.

Safran

S. P.

(2008). Why youngsters with autistic spectrum disorders remain underrepresented in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 90–95.

20.

Schopler

Reichler

Renner

(1988). The Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

21.

Waggoner

C. E.

(2005). Comparison of the BASC-2 to the BASC PRS in a population of children and adolescents classified as HFA, Asperger’s disorder, or PDD NOS, including convergent validity (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas Woman’s University, Denton.

Validating the BASC-TRS for Use With Children and Adolescents With an Educational Diagnosis of Autism

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References