Despite the importance of literacy skill training for incarcerated youth, a very limited number of empirically based research studies have examined reading instruction in correctional facilities. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the Fast ForWord computer-assisted reading program improved the reading and spelling abilities of incarcerated youth. A group of 51 incarcerated male youth identified by facility staff as low performers in reading composed the target group for this study. Both standardized and curriculum-based measures were employed to determine reading and spelling skill growth over an average of 24 sessions in an 11-week intervention. Results indicated no clear literacy skill improvement for the treatment group. Implications for future research are discussed.
BegleyS. (2000, January1). Rewiring your gray matter. Newsweek, pp. 63–67.
2.
BormanG. D.BensonJ. (in press). A randomized field trial of the Fast ForWord Language computer-based training program. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis.
3.
CoulterG. A. (2004). Reaching the summit: The contribution of America Reads and AmeriCorps to school and university partnerships. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(2), 202–205.
4.
DaneA. V.SchneiderB. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: are implementation effects out of control?Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 23–24.
5.
DrakefordW. (2002). The impact of an intensive program to increase the literacy skills of youth confined to juvenile corrections. Journal of Correctional Education, 53(4), 139–144.
6.
FoleyR. M. (2001). Academic characteristics of incarcerated youth and correctional educational programs: A literature review. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 9(4), 248–259.
7.
HarrisP. J.BaltodanoH. M.ArtilesA. J.RutherfordR. B. (2006). Integration of culture in reading studies for youth in corrections: A literature review. Education and Treatment of Children, 29(4), 749–778.
8.
HouchinsD. E.HerkM.ShippenM. E.AntinozziJ.HaberlinS.HeffelfingerP.. (2006). Profile of children under the age of 13 in Georgia’s juvenile justice system. Journal of At-Risk Issues, 12(1), 21–26.
9.
HouchinsD. E.JolivetteK.KrezmienM. P.BaltodanoH. M. (2008). A multi-state study examining the impact of explicit reading instruction with incarcerated students. Journal of Correctional Education, 5(1), 65–85.
10.
HouchinsD.Puckett-PattersonD.CrosbyS.ShippenM. E.JolivetteK. (2009). Barriers and facilitators to providing incarcerated youth with a quality education. Preventing School Failure, 53(3), 159–166.
11.
LarsenS.HammillD.MoatsL. (1999). Test of Written Spelling–4. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
12.
LeoneP. E.KrezmeinM.MasonL.MeiselS. M. (2005). Organizing and delivering empirically based literacy instruction to incarcerated youth. Exceptionality, 13(2), 89–102.
13.
LeoneP. E.MeiselS. M.DrakefordW. (2002). Special education programs for youth with disabilities in juvenile corrections. Journal of Correctional Education, 53(2), 46–50.
14.
MalmgrenK. W.LeoneP. E. (2000). Effects of a short-term auxiliary reading program on the reading skills of incarcerated youth. Education and Treatment of Children, 23(3), 239–247.
15.
MulcahyC. A.KrezmienM. P.LeoneP. E.HouchinsD. E.BaltodanoH. (2008). Lessons learned: Barriers and solutions for conducting reading investigations in juvenile corrections settings. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 24, 239–252.
16.
National Center on Education, Disability and Juvenile Justice. (2007). Juvenile correctional education programs. College Park, MD: Author.
17.
OrmrodJ. E. (1999). Human learning (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
QuinnM. M.RutherfordR. R.LeoneP. E.OsherD. M.PoirierJ. M. (2005). Youth with disabilities in juvenile corrections: A national survey. Exceptional Children, 71(3), 339–345.
19.
RozalskiM. E.EngleS. (2005). Literacy education in correctional facilities: The “hope” for technology. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 21, 301–305.
20.
Scientific Learning Corporation. (2007). Professional development: Training workbook. Oakland, CA: Author.
Shelley-TremblayJ.O’BrienN.Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ. (2007). Reading disability in adjudicated youth: Prevalence rates, current models, traditional and innovative treatments. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 376–392.
25.
SkinnerB. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
26.
StevensJ. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
TorgesonJ. K.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2007, July9). WWC intervention report—Fast ForWord. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
30.
WoodcockR. W. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test–Revised/Normative Update. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
31.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.
