University faculty members play an essential role in ensuring that students with disabilities receive a quality postsecondary education. Many factors influence the willingness of faculty to provide quality services. The purpose of this survey study was to identify these influential factors through a structural equation modeling model. Findings indicate that faculty personal beliefs have the most direct influence on provision of reasonable accommodations; knowledge of legal responsibilities and perceived institutional support directly influence personal beliefs. Suggestions for training programs and interventions are made to improve faculty personal beliefs and enhance their provision of accommodations and support to students with disabilities.
Baggett, D. ( 1994, March). A study of faculty awareness of students with disabilities. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Association for Developmental Education, Kansas City, MO.
2.
Benham, N.E. ( 1997). Faculty attitudes and knowledge regarding specific disabilities and the Americans with Disabilities Act. College Student Journal , 31(1), 124-125.
3.
Berry, G., & Mellard, D. ( 2002, May). Current status on accommodating students with disabilities in selected community and technical colleges: Fall 1999-Spring 2001. Lawrence: University of Kansas. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED470385)
4.
Bourke, A.B., Strehorn, K.C., & Silver, P. ( 2000). Faculty members’ provision of instructional accommodations to students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(1), 26-32.
5.
Bowe, F. ( 1987). Section 504: 10 years later. American Rehabilitation, 13(2), 2-3, 23-24.
6.
Burgstahler, S., Duclos, R., & Turcotte, M. ( 2000). Preliminary findings: Faculty, teaching assistant, and student perceptions regarding accommodating students with disabilities in postsecondary environments. Seattle: University of Washington, DO-IT. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED456718)
7.
Campbell, J., Gilmore, L., & Cuskelly, M. ( 2003). Changing student teachers’ attitudes towards disability and inclusion. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability , 28(4), 369-379.
8.
Cohen, J. ( 1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Dodd, J.M., Rose, P.M., & Belcourt, L. ( 1992). Tribal college faculty attitudes toward accommodations and services for students with disabilities. Tribal College , 4(1), 22-29.
10.
Fichman, M., & Cummings, J.N. (2003). Multiple imputation for missing data: Making the most of what you know. Organizational Research Methods, 6(3), 282-308.
11.
Fichten, C., Amsel, R., Bourdon, C.V., & Creti, L. ( 1988). Interactions between college students with physical disabilities and their professors. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling , 19(1), 13-20.
12.
Fonosch, G.G., & Schwab, L.O. ( 1981). Attitudes of selected university faculty members toward disabled students. Journal of College Student Personnel, 22(3), 229-235.
13.
Gitlow, L. ( 2001). Occupational therapy faculty attitudes toward the inclusion of students with disabilities in their educational programs. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 21(2), 115-131.
14.
Henderson, C. ( 1995). College freshmen with disabilities: A triennial statistical profile. Retrieved September 7, 2006, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/14/35/27.pdf
15.
Houck, C.K., Asselin, S.B., Troutman, G.C., & Arrington, J.M. (1992). Students with learning disabilities in the university environment: A study of faculty and student perceptions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(10), 678-684.
16.
Leyser, Y. ( 1989). A survey of faculty attitudes and accommodations for students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 7(3-4), 97-108.
17.
MacKinnon, D.P., Fairchild, A.J., & Fritz, M.S. ( 2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593-614.
18.
Matthews, P.R., Anderson, D.W., & Skolnick, B.D. (1989). Faculty attitude toward accommodations for college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Focus, 3(1), 46-52.
19.
Michaels, C.A., Prezant, F.P., Morabito, S.M., & Jackson, K. ( 2002). Assistive and instructional technology for college students with disabilities: A national snapshot of postsecondary service providers . Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(1), 5-14.
National Center for Education Statistics. ( 1999). Students with disabilities in postsecondary education: A profile of preparation, participation, and outcomes. Retrieved March 9, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs99/1999187.pdf
22.
National Center for Education Statistics. ( 2002). Profile of undergraduates in U.S. postsecondary education institutions: 1999-2000. Retrieved September 7, 2006, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002168.PDF
23.
National Center for Education Statistics. ( 2006). Profile of undergraduates in U.S. postsecondary education institutions: 2003-2004, with a special analysis of community college students . Retrieved September 7, 2006, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006184_rev.pdf
24.
National Center for Education Statistics. ( 2007). Digest of education statistics: 2007. Retrieved June 3, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2008/2008022.pdf
25.
Norton, S.M. ( 1997). Examination accommodations for community college students with learning disabilities: How are they viewed by faculty and students? Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 21(1), 57-69.
26.
Rao, S.M. ( 2002). Students with disabilities in higher education: Faculty attitudes and willingness to provide accommodations (Doctoral dissertation, University of Arkansas, 2002). Retrieved June 17, 2008, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text database. (AAT 3079101)
27.
Rao, S. ( 2004). Faculty attitudes and students with disabilities in higher education: A literature review. College Student Journal, 38(2), 191-199.
28.
Rao, S., & Gartin, B.C. ( 2003). Attitudes of university faculty toward accommodations to students with disabilities. Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 25(2), 47-54.
29.
SAS Institute. (2004). Institute SAS/STAT software version 9. Cary, NC: Author.
30.
Schafer, J. ( 1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall.
31.
Schoen, E., Uysal, M., & McDonald, C.D. (1986). Attitudes of faculty members toward treatment of disabled students reexamined. College Student Journal, 21(2), 190-193.
32.
Sweener, K., Kundert, D., May, D., & Quinn, K. ( 2002). Comfort with accommodations at the community college level. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3), 12-18.
33.
Thompson, B. ( 2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
34.
Vasek, D. ( 2005). Assessing the knowledge base of faculty at a private, four-year institution. College Student Journal, 39(2), 307-315.
35.
Villarreal, P. ( 2002). Faculty knowledge of disability law: Implications for higher education practice. Waco, TX: Baylor University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED472463)
36.
Vogel, S.A., Leyser, Y., Wyland, S., & Brulle, A. ( 1999). Students with learning disabilities in higher education: Faculty attitude and practices. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14(3), 173-187.
37.
Williamson, P.T. ( 2000). Attitudes of the Troy State University Dothan faculty toward students with disabilities (Doctoral dissertation, Auburn University, 2002). Retrieved June 26, 2008, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text database. (AAT 9965743)
38.
Wilson, K., Getzel, E., & Brown, T. ( 2000). Enhancing the postsecondary campus climate for students with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 14, 37-50.
39.
Wolman, C., McCrink, C.S., Rodriguez, S.F., & Harris-Looby, J. (2004). The Accommodation of University Students with Disabilities Inventory (AUSDI): Assessing American and Mexican faculty attitudes toward students with disabilities. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 3(3), 284-295.
40.
Yuker, H. E. (Ed.). (1988). Attitudes toward persons with disabilities. New York: Springer.
41.
Yuker, H.E. ( 1994). Variables that influence attitudes toward people with disabilities: Conclusions from the data. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 3-22.
