The purpose of this study was to determine whether technically adequate curriculum-based measures of writing could be identified for use with high school students. The participants included 10th-grade general and special education students from two public school districts in Wisconsin. Students (n = 82) completed two narrative writing samples in response to story starters, and samples were scored for four alternative curriculum-based measures: incorrect word sequences (ICWS), correct punctuation marks (CPM), adverbs (ADV), and adjectives (ADJ). Results revealed moderately strong alternate-form reliability and criterion-related validity coefficients for ICWS. Although CPM was found to be reliable, the criterion-related validity evidence varied according to the type of criterion measure. Other findings indicated that ICWS and CPM cut scores may have utility for specific screening purposes. The curriculum-based measures of ADJ and ADV, however, were not found to have the technical adequacy needed for predictive purposes.
Ardoin, S.P., Witt, J.C., Suldo, S.M., Connell, J.E., Koenig, J.L., Resetar, J.L., Slider, N.J., & Williams, K.L. (2004). Examining the incremental benefits of administering a maze and three versus one curriculum-based measurement reading probes when conducting universal screening. School Psychology Review, 33, 218-233.
Deno, S.L. ( 1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative . Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
6.
Deno, S.L. ( 1992). The nature and development of curriculum-based measurement . Preventing School Failure, 36(2), 5-11.
7.
Deno, S.L. ( 2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Special Education, 37, 184-193.
8.
Deno, S.L., Marston, D., & Mirkin, P.L. ( 1982). Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression. Exceptional Children, 48, 368-371.
9.
Deno, S.L., Mirkin, P.K., & Marston, D. ( 1980). Relationships among simple measures of written expression and performance on standardized achievement tests (Research Report No. 22) . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
10.
Espin, C.A., De La Paz, S., Scierka, B.J., & Roelofs, L. ( 2005). The relationship between curriculum-based measures in written expression and quality and completeness of expository writing for middle school students. Journal of Special Education, 38, 208-217.
11.
Espin, C.A., Scierka, B.J., Skare, S., & Halverson, N. ( 1999). Criterion-related validity of curriculum-based measures in writing for secondary students. Reading and Writing Quarterly , 15(1), 5-27.
12.
Espin, C.A., Shinn, J., Deno, S.L., Skare, S., Robinson, S., & Benner, B. ( 2000). Identifying indicators of written expression proficiency for middle school students. Journal of Special Education, 34, 140-154.
13.
Espin, C.A., & Tindal, G. ( 1998). Curriculum-based measurement for secondary students . In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 214-253). New York: Guilford.
14.
Fuchs, L.S., Deno, S.L., & Mirkin, P.K. ( 1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449-460.
15.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. ( 1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation on student achievement: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children , 53, 199-208.
16.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Stecker, P.M. ( 1989). Effects of curriculum-based measurement on teachers’ instructional planning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 51-59.
17.
Gansle, K.A., Noell, G.H., VanDerHeyden, A.M., Naquin, G.A., & Slider, N.J. ( 2002). Moving beyond total words written: The reliability, criterion validity, and time cost of alternative measures for curriculum-based measurement in writing. School Psychology Review, 31, 477-498.
18.
Gansle, K.A., Noell, G.H., VanDerHeyden, A.M., Slider, N.J., Hoffpauir, L.D., Whitmarsh, E.L., & Naquin, G.M. ( 2004). An examination of the criterion validity and sensitivity to brief interventions of alternate curriculum-based measures of writing skill . Psychology in the Schools, 41(3), 291-300.
19.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. ( 2002). Prevention and intervention for struggling writers . In M. Shinn, G. Stoner, & H. Walker (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems: Vol. 2. Preventative and remedial techniques (pp. 589-610). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists .
20.
Graham, S., Harris, K.R., & Larsen, L. ( 2001). Prevention and intervention of writing difficulties for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 74-84.
21.
Harris, K.R., & Graham, S. ( 1999). Programmatic intervention research: Illustrations from the evolution of self-regulated strategy development. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 251-262.
22.
Howell, J.F., & Memering, D. ( 1986). Brief handbook for writers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23.
Lienemann, T.O., Graham, S., Leader-Janssen, B., & Reid, R. ( 2006). Improving the writing performance of struggling writers in second grade. Journal of Special Education, 40, 66-78.
24.
Marston, D. ( 1982). The technical adequacy of direct, repeated measurement of academic skills in low-achieving elementary students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
25.
Marston, D. ( 1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford .
26.
McMaster, K., & Espin, C.A. ( 2007). Technical features of curriculum-based measurement in writing: A literature review. Journal of Special Education , 41, 68-84.
27.
Monsaas, J.A. ( 2001). Review of the TerraNova. In B. S. Plake & J. C. Impara (Eds.), The fourteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 1223-1226). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements .
28.
National Center for Educational Statistics. ( 2002). National assessment for educational progress. Retrieved November 13, 2005, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/writing/results2002/natachieve.asp
29.
Nitko, A.J. ( 2001). Review of the TerraNova. In B. S. Plake & J. C. Impara (Eds.), The fourteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 1226-1229). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements .
30.
Noyce, R.M., & Christie, J.F. (1985). Characteristics of subordinate clauses in children’s free writing. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 18, 68-71.
31.
O’Connor, R.E., White, A., & Swanson, H.L. ( 2007). Repeated reading versus continuous reading: Influences on reading fluency and comprehension. Exceptional Children , 74, 31-46.
32.
Parker, R., Tindal, G., & Hasbrouck, J. ( 1991). Countable indices of writing quality: Their suitability for screening-eligibility decisions. Exceptionality, 2, 1-17.
33.
Re, A.M., Pedron, M., & Cornoldi, C. ( 2007). Expressive writing difficulties in children described as exhibiting ADHD symptoms. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 40, 244-255.
34.
Scott, C.M., & Windsor, J. ( 2000). General language performance measures in spoken and written narrative and expository discourse of school-age children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research , 43, 324-339.
35.
Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement. New York: Guilford.
36.
Silliman, E.R., Jimerson, T.L., & Wilkinson, L.C. (2000). A dynamic systems approach to writing assessment in students with learning problems. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 45-64.
37.
Stecker, P.M., Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. ( 2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools , 42(8), 795-819.
Tindal, G., & Parker, R. ( 1989). Assessment of written expression for students in compensatory and special education programs. Journal of Special Education , 23, 545-552.
40.
Tindal, G., & Parker, R. ( 1991). Identifying measures for evaluating written expression . Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 6, 211-218.
41.
Videen, J., Deno, S.L., & Marston, D. ( 1982). Correct word sequences: A valid indicator of writing proficiency in written expression (Research Report No. 84). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute of Research on Learning Disabilities.
42.
Watkinson, J.T., & Lee, S.W. ( 1992). Curriculum-based measures of written expression for learning-disabled and non-disabled students. Psychology in the Schools, 29, 184-191.
43.
Weissenburger, J.W., & Espin, C.A. ( 2005). Curriculum-based measures of writing across grade levels . Journal of School Psychology, 43, 153-169.
