Collaborative teaching has grown in popularity as students with disabilities have been increasingly moved to general education classrooms. Despite the growth of these models, little empirical evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of these practices. In this investigation, general and special education teachers (N = 118) from 20 urban elementary schools were surveyed regarding their perceptions of collaborative teaching. The survey instrument elicited teacher perceptions about collaboration, their views regarding inclusion, and what is needed to ensure effective collaborative teaching. Findings indicate that 92% of respondents thought that collaboration was occurring in their school but that only 57% reported use of the practices in their own classrooms. Respondents valued inclusive practices, although special educators had more positive perceptions than did general educators. The interpersonal and structural factors valued by these teachers included team processes, positive attitudes, resources, professional development, leadership, university training, accountability, shared responsibility, and communication.
Austin, V. (2001). Teachers' beliefs about co-teaching. Remedial & Special Education, 22, 245-255.
2.
Barnett, C., & Monda-Amaya, L. (1998). Principals' knowledge of and attitudes toward inclusion. Remedial & Special Education , 19, 181-191.
3.
Billingsley, B., Carlson, E., & Klein, S. (2004). The working conditions and induction support of early career special educators. Exceptional Children, 70, 333-347.
4.
Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(3), 1-16.
5.
Coombs-Richardson, R., & Mead, J. (2001). Supporting general educators' inclusive practices . Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 383-390.
6.
DeSimone, J.R., & Parmar, R.S. (2006). Middle school mathematics teachers' beliefs about inclusion of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 21, 98-110.
7.
Embich, J. (2001). The relationship of secondary education teachers' roles and factors that lead to professional burnout. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24(1), 58-69.
8.
Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T., MacCallum, R.C., & Strahan, E.J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.
9.
Fennick, E., & Liddy, D. (2001). Responsibilities and preparation for collaborative teaching: Co-teachers' perspectives. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24(3), 229-240.
10.
Foley, R.M., & Mundschenk, N.A. (1997). Secondary school general educators' collaboration competencies and collaboration activities with general educators, special educators, and community service providers: A status report . Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30, 154-166.
11.
Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2000). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals. New York: Longman .
12.
Gable, R.A., Mostert, M.P., & Tonelson, S.W. (2004). Assessing professional collaboration in schools: Knowing what works. Preventing School Failure, 48(3), 4-8.
13.
Gorsuch, R.L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Grossman, K.N., Beaupre, B., & Rossi, R. (2001, September 7). Poorest kids often wind up with the weakest teachers. Chicago Sun Times, 6.
15.
Idol, L. (2006). Toward inclusion of special education: A program evaluation of eight schools. Remedial & Special Education , 27, 77-94.
16.
Leonard, L. (2002). Schools as professional communities: Addressing the collaborative challenge. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning. Retrieved August 5, 2006, at http://www.ucalgary.ca/~iejll/volume6/leonard.html
17.
Leonard, L., & Leonard, P. (2003). The continuing trouble with collaboration: Teachers talk. Current Issues in Education, 6(15), 1-13.
18.
Lipman, P. (2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalization, and urban school reform. New York: Routledge.
19.
Mason, C., Thormann, M., O'Connell, M., & Behrmann, J. (2004). Priority issues reflected in general and special education association journals. Exceptional Children, 70, 215-229.
20.
Morocco, C.C., & Aguilar, C.M. (2002). Coteaching for content understanding: A schoolwide model. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation , 13, 315-347.
21.
Murawski, W.W. (2006). Student outcomes in co-taught secondary English classes: How can we improve? Reading & Writing Quarterly , 22, 227-247.
22.
Murawski, W.W., & Swanson, H.L. (2001). A meta-analysis of coteaching research: Where are the data? Remedial and Special Education, 22, 258-267.
23.
Murray, C. (2004). Clarifying collaborative roles in urban high schools: General educators' perspectives. Teaching Exceptional Children , 36(5), 44-51.
24.
Pugach, M., & Johnson, L. (1989). The challenge of implementing collaboration between general and special education. Exceptional Children, 56, 232-235.
25.
Salisbury, C.L., & McGregor, G. (2002). The administrative climate and context of inclusive elementary schools. Exceptional Children, 68, 259-274.
26.
Schumm, J., Vaughn, S., Haager, D., McDowell, J., Rothlein, L., & Saumell, L. (1995). General education teacher planning: What can students with learning disabilities expect? Exceptional Children, 6, 335-352.
27.
Trent, S., Driver, B., Wood, M., Parrott, P., Martin, T., & Smith, G. (2003). Creating and sustaining a special education/general education partnership: A story of change and uncertainty. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 203-219.
28.
U.S. Department of Education. (1997). Annual report to Congress, fiscal year 1997. Washington, DC: Author.
29.
U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Twenty-fifth annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
Wiggins, K., & Damore, S. (2006). Survivors or friends: A framework for assessing effective collaboration. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(5), 49-56.
