This study documents the implementation of research-based strategies to minimize the occurrence of reading difficulties in a first-grade population. Three strategies were implemented: (a) A system of progress monitoring was used to assess student progress and skill acquisition; (b) instruction was characterized by high intensity through the use of groups with a low student–teacher ratio; and (c) an explicit instructional approach was used for children who lacked phonemic awareness or an understanding of the alphabetic principle. Furthermore, teachers were supported in working collaboratively with one another and were provided with ongoing support from a literacy coach. Ninety percent of participants met or exceeded grade-level expectations by the end of the year, and 75% of treatment resisters were eligible for special education. Challenges related to implementation are discussed.
Alexander, F., & Cervantes, J. (1998). Cuentos foneticos. New York : Scholastic.
2.
Atwell, N. (1998). In the middle. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
3.
Baker, S., Gersten, R., Dimino, J.A., & Griffiths, R. (2004). The sustained use of research-based instructional practice: A case study of peer-assisted learning strategies in mathematics . Remedial and Special Education, 25, 5-23.
4.
Beaver, J. (1997). Developmental reading assessment. Parsippany, NJ: Celebration Press.
5.
Bos, C.S., Mather, N., Friedman Narr, R., & Babur, N. (1999). Interactive, collaborative professional development in early literacy instruction: Supporting the balancing act. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 227-238.
6.
Calkins, L.M. (1994). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
7.
Coyne, M.D., Kameenui, E.J., & Simmons, D.C. (2001). Prevention and intervention in beginning reading: Two complex systems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 62-73.
8.
Cunningham, P.M., & Hall, D.P. (1994). Making words. Parsippany, NJ: Good Apple.
9.
Deno, S.L., Fuchs, L.S., Marston, D., & Shin, J. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 507-524.
10.
Ehri, L.C., Nunes, S.R., & Stahl, S. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panels meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393-447.
11.
Elliott, S.N., & Fuchs, L.S. (1997). The utility of curriculum-based measurement and performance assessment as alternatives to traditional intelligence and achievement tests. School Psychology Review, 26, 224- 233.
12.
Foorman, B.R., & Torgesen, J. (2001). Critical elements of classroom and small-group instruction promote reading success in all children. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 203-212.
13.
Fountas, I.C., & Pinnell, G.S. (1996). Guided reading: Good first reading for all children . Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Frey, B.B., Lee, S.W., Tollefson, N., Pass, L., & Massengill, D. (2005). Balanced literacy in an urban school district. The Journal of Educational Research , 98, 272-280.
16.
Gersten, R., Chard, D., & Baker, S. (2000). Factors enhancing sustained use of research-based instructional factors. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 445-457.
17.
Gersten, R., & Dimino, J. (2001). The realities of translating research into classroom practice. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 120-130.
18.
Gersten, R., Vaughn, S., Deshler, D., & Schiller, E. (1997). What we know about using research findings: Implications for improving special education practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 466-476.
19.
Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
20.
Hasbrouck, J.E., Woldbeck, T., Ihnot, C., & Parker, R.I. (1999). One teachers use of curriculum-based measurement: A changed opinion. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice , 14, 118-126.
21.
Hiebert, E.H., & Pearson, D.P. (2000). Building on the past, bridging to the future: A research agenda for the Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement . The Journal of Educational Research, 93, 133-144.
22.
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of fifty-four children from first through fourth grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437-447.
23.
Juel, C., & Minden-Cupp, C. (2000). Learning to read words: Linguistic units and instructional strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 458-492.
24.
Kaminski, R., & Good, R.H. (1996). Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 25, 215-227.
Lane, K.L., & Menzies, H.M. (2002). Promoting achievement and minimizing risk. Phase I: The impact of a school-based primary intervention program. Preventing School Failure, 47, 26-32.
27.
Malouf, D.B., & Schiller, E.P. (1995). Practice and research in special education. Exceptional Children, 61, 414-424.
28.
National Center for Educational Statistics. ( 2004). National assessment of educational progress homepage . Retrieved June 21, 2006 from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/naepdata/
29.
OShaughnessy, T.E., Lane, K.L., Gresham, F.M., & Beebe-Frankenberger, M.E. (2003). Children placed at risk for learning and behavioral difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 27-35.
30.
Reid, D.K., Hresko, W.P., & Hammill, D.D. (2001). Test of early reading abilities (rev. ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
31.
Shefelbine, J. (1998). Scholastic phonics chapter books. New York: Scholastic.
32.
Torgesen, J.K. (2002). The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 7-26.
33.
Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L.S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137-146.
34.
Vaughn, S., Klingner, J., & Hughes, M. (2000). Sustainability of research-based practices. Exceptional Children, 66, 163-171.
35.
Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Kouzekanani, K., Bryant, D.P., Dickson, S., & Blozis, S.A. (2003). Reading instruction grouping for students with reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 301-315.
