In recent years, education policies have focused on raising the standards for paraprofessional qualifications, supervision, and development. Given the increasingly problematic rates of paraprofessional turnover, focusing on the retention of effective paraprofessionals is of equal importance. In an effort to understand the reasons for and costs of turnover and to identify strategies that increase the likelihood of retention, 53 district and school employees from six schools in three school districts were interviewed. The findings indicated that the costs of turnover are felt at every level within a school district: central office, school, team, and student. Also suggested were strategies for increasing retention, including ensuring a threshold wage, focusing on job matching early in the employment process, providing ongoing support and direction, and developing a team culture in which paraprofessionals feel valued.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blalock, G. (1991). Paraprofessionals: Critical team members in our special education programs. Intervention in School and Clinic , 26, 200—214.
2.
Carroll, D. (2001). Considering paraeducator training, roles, and responsibilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(2), 60—64.
3.
Droege, S.B., & Hoobler, J.M. (2003). Employee turnover and tacit knowledge diffusion: A network perspective. Journal of Managerial Issues, 15(1), 50—66.
4.
Elrod, G.F., Insko, L., & Williams, L. (1993). A descriptive study of instructional assistants in rural and remote Eastern Oregon: Implications for professional development . Rural Special Education Quarterly, 12(4), 22—29.
5.
French, N. (1997). Management of paraeducators. In A. L. Pickett & K. Gerlach (Eds.), Supervising paraeducators in school settings: A team approach (pp. 91—169). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
6.
French, N. (1999). Paraeducators: Who are they and what do they do?Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(1), 65—69.
7.
French, N., & Chopra, R. (1999). Parent perspectives on the roles of paraprofessionals . The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps , 24, 259—272.
8.
French, N., & Pickett, A.L. (1997). Paraprofessionals in special education: Issues for teacher educators. Teacher Education and Special Education , 20, 61—73.
9.
Freschi, D. (1999). Guidelines for working with one-to-one aides. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(4), 42—45.
10.
Frith, G.H., & Mims, A. (1985). Burnout among special education paraprofessionals . Teaching Exceptional Children, 17(3), 225—227.
11.
Ghere, G. (2003). Employing, directing, and supporting paraprofessionals in inclusive education programs for students with disabilities: A multi-site case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
12.
Ghere, G., & York-Barr, J. (2003). Employing, developing, and directing special education paraprofessionals in inclusive education programs: Findings from a multi-site case study. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration.
13.
Giangreco, M., & Broer, S. (2005). Questionable utilization of paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: Are we addressing symptoms or causes?Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 10—26.
14.
Giangreco, M., Broer, S., & Edelman, S. (1999). The tip of the iceberg: Determining whether paraprofessional support is needed for students with disabilities in general education settings . The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps , 24, 281—291.
15.
Giangreco, M.F., Broer, S.M., & Edelman, S.W. (2002). “That was then, this is now!” Paraprofessional supports for students with disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptionality, 10, 47—64.
16.
Giangreco, M.F., Edelman, S.W., & Broer, S.M. (2001). Respect, appreciation, and acknowledgement of paraprofessionals who support students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 67, 485—498.
Giangreco, M.F., Edelman, S.W., Broer, S.M., & Doyle, M.B. (2001). Paraprofessional support of students with disabilities: Literature from the past decade. Exceptional Children, 68, 45—63.
19.
Giangreco, M.F., Edelman, S.W., Luiselli, T., & MacFarland, S. (1997). Helping or hovering? Effects of instructional assistant proximity on students with disabilities. Exceptional Chidren, 64, 7—18.
20.
Glasser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
21.
Harvard Management Update. (April, 2000). Employee retention: What managers can do. Boston: Harvard Business School.
22.
Kaye, B., & Jordan-Evans, S. (2001). Retaining key employees . Public Management, 83, 6—12.
23.
Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Likins, M. (2002). Effective training for paraprofessionals. Impact, 15(2), 6—7.
25.
Miles, M., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Minondo, S., Meyer, L., & Xin, J.F. (2001). The role and responsibilities of teaching assistants in inclusive education: What's appropriate?The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 114— 119.
27.
Mueller, P., & Murphy, F. (2001). Determining when a student requires paraeducator support. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(6), 22—27.
28.
Passaro, P.D., Pickett, A.L., Latham, G., & Hong Bo, W. (1994). The training and support needs of paraprofessionals in rural special education. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 13(4), 3—9.
29.
Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Pickett, A.L. (1990). Paraprofessionals in education: Personnel practices that influence their performance, training needs, and retention. New York: City University of New York, Center for Advanced Study of Education.
31.
Pickett, A.L., & Gerlach, K. (1997). Paraeducators in school settings: The future. In A. L. Pickett & K. Gerlach (Eds.), Supervising paraeducators in school settings: A team approach (pp. 263—267). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
32.
Pickett, A.L., Likins, M., & Wallace, T. (2003). The employment and preparation of paraeducators: The state of the art—2003. National Resource Center for Paraprofessionals. Retrieved September 28, 2005, from http://www.nrcpara.org
33.
QSR International. (2000). NUD*IST Vivo [Computer software]. Melbourne, Australia: Author.
34.
Riggs, C., & Mueller, P. (2001). Employment and utilization of paraeducators in inclusive settings. The Journal of Special Education, 35, 54—62.
35.
Senge, P. (2000). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. New York: Doubleday.
36.
Sparks, D., & Hirsch, S. (1997). A new vision for sta f development. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
37.
Taylor, C. (2003). The tides of talent: New studies reveal some surprising factors behind why the best employees leave or stay. Training and Development, 4, 34—40.
38.
Tillery, C.Y., Werts, M.G., Roark, R., & Harris, S. (2003). Perceptions of paraeducators on job retention . Teacher Education and Special Education, 26, 118—127.
39.
Wadsworth, D.E., & Knight, D. (1996). Paraprofessionals: The bridge to successful inclusion . Intervention in School and Clinic, 31, 166—171.
40.
Wallace, T., Shin, J., Bartholomay, T., & Stahl, B.J. (2001). Knowledge and skills for teachers supervising the work of paraprofessionals. Exceptional Children, 67, 520—533.
41.
York-Barr, J., Sommerness, J., Duke, K., & Ghere, G. (2005). Special educators in inclusive education programmes: Reframing their work as teacher leadership. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 9, 193— 215.
