Although researchers have clearly connected dropping out of school to prolonged low achievement, to date, effective teaching practices are largely absent from the milieu of interventions and programs that are employed by schools to address dropout prevention. As such, effective instructional design and delivery as a focus for keeping students with disabilities in school appears to be an inconspicuous strategy for dropout prevention. We provide an overview of dropout prevention efforts by researchers and federal, state, and local educators; a rationale for connecting effective teaching principles to the challenge of graduating students with disabilities; and a brief overview of 10 effective teaching principles and how they relate to academic success that leads to school completion. Practical strategies that teachers can use to make their instruction more effective are also included.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abt Associates. (2004). State and local implementation of Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Final report of Focus Study 11. Retrieved August 23, 2004, from http://www.abt.sliidea.org/index.htm
2.
Adams, G.L., & Engelmann, S. (1996). Research on direct instruction: 25 years beyond DISTAR. Seattle: Adams and Engelmann Educational Achievement Systems.
3.
Blackorby, J., & Wagner, M. (1996). Longitudinal post-school outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399—413.
Carroll, J.B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723—733.
6.
Christenson, S.L., Sinclair, M.F., Lehr, C.A., & Hurley, C.M. (2000). Promoting successful school completion. In K. M. Minke & G. C. Bear (Eds.), Preventing school problems—Promoting school success (pp. 211— 257). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
7.
Cobb, B., Sample, P., Alwell, M., & Johns, M. (2005). E fective interventions in dropout prevention: A research synthesis. The e fects of cognitive-behavioral interventions on dropout for youth with disabilities. Retrieved June 4, 2006 , from http://www.dropoutprevention.org/NDPC-SD/resources/research.htm
8.
deBettencourt, L.U. (2003). Teaching students with mild and high incidence disabilities at the secondary level. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
Deshler, D. (2004, July). Institute for academic access . Paper presented at a capacity building institute for Improving Academic Performance and Access to the General Curriculum for Secondary Youth with Disabilities, Washington, DC.
10.
Deshler, D., Shumaker, J., Lenz, K., Bulgreen, J., Hock, M., Knight, J., et al. (2001). Ensuring content-area learning by secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 96— 108.
11.
Dickson, S.V., Chard, D.J., & Simmons, D.C. (1993). An integrated reading/writing curriculum: A focus on scaffolding. LD Forum, 18(4), 12— 16.
12.
Dunn, C., Chambers, D., & Rabren, K. (2004). Variables affecting students' decisions to drop out of school. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 314—323.
13.
Dynarski, M., & Gleason, P. (1999). How can we help? Lessons from federal dropout prevention programs. Princeton, NJ: Mathematical Policy Research.
14.
Ellis, E.S., Worthington, L., & Larkin, M.J. (1994). Executive summary of research synthesis on e fective teaching principles and the design of quality tools for educators (Technical Report No. 6, University of Oregon, National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators). Retrieved July 17, 2004, from http://idea.uoregon.edu/~ncite/documents/techrep/other.html
15.
Finn, J.D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. Buffalo, NY: U.S. Department of Education , National Center for Educational Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
16.
Gage, N.L. (1997). “The vision thing”: Educational research and AERA in the 21st century: Part 1. Competing visions of what educational researchers should do. Educational Researcher, 26(4), 18—21.
17.
Gersten, R., Williams, J., Fuchs, L., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279—320.
18.
Grayson, T.E. (1998). Dropout prevention and special services. In F. R. Rusch & J. G. Chadsey (Eds.), Beyond high school: Transition from school to work (pp. 77—98). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
19.
Guterman, B.R. (1995). The validity of categorical learning disabilities services: The consumer's view. Exceptional Children, 62, 111—124.
20.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (1990)(amended 1997)
21.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004)(reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990)
22.
Kame'enui, E. (1991, Fall). Toward a scientific pedagogy of learning disabilities: Sameness in the message. Direct Instruction News, 17—22.
23.
Kortering, L.J., & Braziel, P.M. (1999). School dropout from the perspective of former students: Implications for secondary special education programs. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 78—83.
24.
Lehr, C.S., Hansen, A., Sinclair, M.F., & Christenson, S.L. (2001). An integrative review of data-based interventions: Moving beyond dropout towards school completion . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota , Institute on Community Integration.
25.
Lichtenstein, S. (1993). Transition from school to adulthood: Case studies of adults with learning disabilities who dropped out of school. Exceptional Children, 59, 336—347.
26.
McPartland, J.M. (1994). Dropout prevention in theory and practice. In R. J. Rossi (Ed.), Schools and students at risk: Context and framework for positive change (pp. 255—276). New York: Teachers College Press.
27.
Maheady, L. (1997). Preparing teachers for instructing multiple ability groups. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20, 322—339.
28.
Martin, J., Tobin, T.J., & Sugai, G.M. (2002). Current information on dropout prevention: Ideas from practitioners and the literature. Prevention of School Failure,47(1), 10—17.
29.
Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (2002). Teaching tutorial: Mnemonic instruction. Retrieved December 15, 2005, from http://www.TeachingLD.org
30.
Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (2004). The inclusive classroom: Strategies for e fective instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31.
Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., Bakken, J.P., & Whedon, C. (1996). Reading comprehension: A synthesis of research in learning disabilities. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 10, Part B, pp. 201—223). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
32.
Mercer, C., & Mercer, A. (2001). Teaching students with learning problems (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
33.
Miller, S. (2002). Validated practices for teaching students with diverse needs and abilities. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
34.
National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
35.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq.
36.
President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002, July). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
37.
Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Whittrock (Ed.), The handbook of research and teaching (pp. 376—391). New York: Macmillan .
38.
Rosenthal, B.S. (1998). Non-school correlates of dropout: An integrative review of the literature. Children and Youth Services Review , 20, 413— 433.
39.
Rumberger, R.W. (1995). Dropping out of middle school: A multilevel analysis of students and schools. American Education Research Journal , 32, 582—625.
40.
Sugai, G., & Horner, R. (2002). The evolution of discipline practices: School-wide positive behavior supports. Child & FamilyBehavior Therapy , 24(1), 23—50.
41.
Swanson, H.L., & Hoskyn, M. (1998). Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68, 277—321.
42.
Thurlow, M.L., Sinclair, M.F., & Johnson, D.R. (2002, July). Students with disabilities who drop out of school: Implications for policy and practice. Issue Brief , 1(12). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration, National Center on Secondary Education and Transition .
43.
U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Twenty-fourth annual report to congress on the implementation of IDEA . Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
44.
U.S. Government Accounting Office. (2002). School dropouts: Education could play a stronger role in identifying and disseminating promising prevention strategies (GAO-02-240). Washington, DC: Author.
45.
Vaughn, S., Bos, C.S., & Schumm, J.S. (2003). Teaching exceptional, diverse, and at-risk students in the general education classroom (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
46.
Wagner, M., Blackorby, J., & Hebbeler, K. (1993). Beyond the report card: The multiple dimensions of secondary school performance of students with disabilities. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
47.
Wagner, M. & Cameto, R. (2004). The characteristics, experiences, and outcomes of youth with emotional disturbances. National Longitudinal Transition Study 2 Data Brief, 3(2).
