The Effectiveness of the Picture Exchange Communication System with Nonspeaking Adults

Abstract

Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) training was implemented with 5 nonspeaking adults with mental retardation who were not currently using any type of functional communication system. A modified ABAB, single-subject design was used to assess the effectiveness of PECS in enhancing the functional communication skills of these individuals. Three individuals progressed through 4 PECS training phases relatively quickly and developed functional skills that they were able to display in home and community settings. Two other individuals demonstrated limited progress, and the PECS training did not meaningfully alter their level of communicative competence. Implications for teaching functional communication skills to nonspeaking adults are discussed, and recommendations for future research are provided.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Speech—Language—Hearing Association. (1991). Report: Augmentative and alternative communication . ASHA, 33(Suppl. 5), 9—12.

Baer, D.M. , Wolf, M.M. , & Risley, J.R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91—97.

Beukelman, D. , & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Brookes.

Boardmaker Windows Version 1.4 [Computer software]. (1998). Solona Beach, CA.: Mayer-Johnson.

Bondy, A. , & Frost, L. (1994). The picture exchange communication system. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 9, 1—19.

Bondy, A. , & Frost, L. (2001). The picture exchange communication system. Behavior Modification, 25, 725—745.

Charlop-Christy, M.H. , Carpenter, M. , Le, L. , LeBlanc, L.A. , & Kellet, K. (2002). Using the picture exchange communication system (PECS) with children with autism: Assessment of PECS acquisition, speech, social-communicative behavior, and problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 213—233.

Horner, R.H. , & Budd, C.M. (1985). Acquisition of manual sign use: Collateral reduction of maladaptive behavior and factors limiting generalization. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 13, 327—335.

Magiati, I. , & Howlin, P. (2003). A pilot evaluation study of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) for children with autistic spectrum disorders . Autism, 7, 297—320.

10.

Olney, M. (2001). Communication strategies of adults with severe disabilities: Supporting self-determination. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 44, 87—94.

11.

Romski, M.A. , Sevcik, R.A. , & Adamson, L.B. (1999). Communication patterns of youth with mental retardation with and without their speech-output communication devices. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 104, 249—259.

12.

Schwartz, I.S. , Garfinkle, A.N. , & Bauer, J. (1998). The Picture Exchange Communication System: Communicative outcomes for young children with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 18, 144—159.

13.

Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1988, 29 U.S.C. § 2201 et seq.

14.

Thompson, J.R. , Siegel, J. , & Kouzoukas, S. (2000). Assistive technology on the eve of the 21st century: Teacher perceptions. Special Education Technology Practice , 2(3), 12—21.

15.

Webb, T. (2000). Can children with autism and severe learning disabilities be taught to communicate spontaneously and effectively using the Picture Exchange Communication System? Good Autism Practice Journal, 1, 29—41.

16.

Wehmeyer, M. (1998). National survey of the use of assistive technology by adults with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 36, 44—51.

17.

Wehmeyer, M. , & Bolding, N. (2001). Enhanced self-determination of adults with intellectual disability as an outcome of moving to community-based work or living environments . Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45, 371—383.

18.

Wehmeyer, M. , & Schwartz, M. (1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities . Exceptional Children, 63, 248—255.