Intervention assistance teams (IATs) can help teachers design and implement interventions to improve the performance of English language learners (ELLs) who are experiencing academic or behavioral difficulties, providing the supports needed to resolve many such difficulties within the context of general education. If interventions are unsuccessful and ELLs are subsequently referred for special education, eligibility decisions are informed by documentation that students did not make adequate progress despite general education problem solving and that students' problems cannot be explained by such factors as limited English proficiency or cultural differences. To be successful, however, IATs must accurately interpret data about ELLs and design culturally and linguistically responsive interventions. This article presents considerations in implementing IATs for ELLs, including team membership, the knowledge base needed by team members, intervention design, and recordkeeping.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adelman, H. (1970). An interactive view of causality. Academic Therapy, 6, 43—52.
2.
Albus, D., Thurlow, M., & Liu, K. (2002). Participation and performance of English language learners reported in public state documents and web sites, 1999—2000 . LEP project report. Minneapolis, MN: National Center for Educational Outcomes. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED472203)
3.
Anderson, L.W., & Pellicer, L.O. (1998). Toward an understanding of unusually successful programs for economically disadvantaged students. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 3, 237—263.
4.
Artiles, A.J., Rueda, R., Salazar, I., & Higareda, I. (2000, November). Factors associated with English learners representation in special education: Emerging evidence from urban school districts in California. Paper presented at the conference on Minority Issues in Special Education in the Public Schools, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
5.
Bahr, M.W., Whitten, E., Dieker, L., Kocarek, C., & Manson, D. (1999). A comparison of school-based intervention teams: Implications for educational and legal reform. Exceptional Children, 66, 67—83.
6.
Chalfant, J.C., & Pysh, M.V.D. (1989). Teacher assistance teams: Five descriptive studies on 96 teams. Remedial and Special Education, 10(6), 49—58.
7.
Chalfant, J.C., Pysh, M.V.D., & Moultrie, R. (1979). Teacher assistance teams—A model for within-building problem solving. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2(3), 85—96.
Craig, S., Hull, K., Haggart, A.G., & Perez-Selles, M. (2000). Promoting cultural competence through teacher assistance teams. Teaching Exceptional Children , 32(3), 6—12.
10.
Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Clevedon, Avon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
11.
Cummins, J. (1989). A theoretical framework for bilingual special education. Exceptional Children, 56, 111—119.
12.
Elmore, R.F., & Fuhrman, S.H. (1994). Governing curriculum: Changing patterns in policy, politics, and practice. In R. F. Elmore , & S. H. Fuhrman (Eds.), The governance of curriculum: 1994 Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (pp. 1—10). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development .
13.
Ewing, N.J. (1995). Culture: A neglected factor in behavior management . In F. E. Obiakor & B. Algozzine (Eds.), Managing problem behaviors: Perspectives for general and special educators (pp. 96—114). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Futrell, M.H., Gomez, J., & Bedden, D. (2003). Teaching the children of a new America: The challenge of diversity. Phi Delta Kappan,84, 381— 385.
16.
Garcia, S.B. (2002). Parent—professional collaboration in culturally sensitive assessment. In A. J. Artiles & A. A. Ortiz (Eds.), English language learners with special education needs: Identification, assessment, and instruction (pp. 87—103). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
17.
Garcia, S.B., & Dominguez, L. (1997). Cultural contexts that influence learning and academic performance. In L. B. Silver (Ed.), Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America: Academic di ficulties (pp. 621—655). Philadelphia : Saunders.
18.
Garcia, S.B., & Malkin, D.H. (1993). Toward defining programs and services for culturally and linguistically diverse learners in special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 26(1), 52—58.
19.
Garcia, S.B., & Ortiz, A.A. (1988). Preventing inappropriate referrals of language minority students to special education. New Focus, No. 5. Wheaton, MD: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
20.
Garcia, S.B., Wilkinson, C.Y., & Ortiz, A.A. (1995). Enhancing achievement for language minority students: Classroom, school and family contexts. Education and Urban Society, 27, 441—462.
21.
Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2000). What we know about effective instructional practices for English language learners. Exceptional Children, 66, 454— 471.
22.
Gresham, F.M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson , & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 467—519). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
Grigg, W.S., Daane, M.C., Jin, J., & Campbell, J.R. (2003). The nation's report card: Reading 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
24.
Grimes, J. (2002). Responsiveness to interventions: The next step in special education identification, service, and exiting decision making . In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 531—547). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
25.
Henderson, A., Abbot, C., & Strang, W. (1993). Summary of the bilingual education state educational agency program survey of states' limited English proficient persons and available educational services 1991— 1992 (Contract No. T292001001, U. S. Department of Education, Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Languages Affairs) . Arlington, VA: Development Associates .
26.
Heubert, J. P., & Hauser, R. M. (Eds.). (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC : National Academy Press.
27.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, H.R. 1350.
28.
Johnson, C.D., Lessem, A., Bergquist, C., Carmichael, D., & Whitten, G. (2001). Disproportionate representations of minority children in special education: Summary report. College Station: Texas A & M University, Public Policy Research Institute.
29.
King, S.H., & Goodwin, A.L. (2002). Culturally responsive parental involvement: Concrete understandings and basic strategies. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
30.
Klein, S., Bugarin, R., Beltranena, R., & McArthur, E. (2004). Language minorities and their educational and labor market indicators—Recent trends. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
Krashen, S. (1982). Bilingual education and second language acquisition theory. In California State Department of Education, Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (pp. 51—79). Los Angeles: Bilingual Education Evaluation, Dissemination, and Assessment Center.
33.
Lerner, J. (2002). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
34.
Linan-Thompson, S., Vaughn, S., Hickman-Davis, P., & Kouzekanani, K. (2003). Effectiveness of supplemental reading instruction for second-grade English language learners with reading difficulties. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 222—238.
35.
Marston, D. (2002). A functional and intervention-based assessment approach to establishing discrepancy for students with learning disabilities . In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 437—447). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
36.
Mayer, D.P., Mullens, J.E., & Moore, M.T. (2000, December). Monitoring school quality: An indicators report. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
37.
Mazzeo, J., Carlson, J.E., Voekl, K.E., & Lutkus, A. (2000). Increasing the participation of special needs students in NAEP: A report on 1996 NAEP research activities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.
38.
National Alliance of Black School Educators & ILIAD Project. (2002). Addressing over-representation of African American students in special education: The prereferral intervention process—An administrator's guide. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children; and Washington, DC : National Alliance of Black School Educators.
39.
National Center for Educational Statistics. ( 2000). Fast response survey system: Survey on professional development and training in U.S. public schools, 1999—2000. Washington, DC: Author.
40.
National Center for Educational Statistics. ( 2004). The condition of education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
41.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P.L. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425.
42.
Oakes, J. (1986). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43.
Ortiz, A.A. (1984). Choosing the language of instruction for bilingual exceptional children. Teaching Exceptional Children, 16(3), 208—212.
44.
Ortiz, A.A. (1990, Fall). Using school-based problem-solving teams for prereferral intervention. Bilingual Special EducationNewsletter, 10(1), 3—5.
45.
Ortiz, A.A. (1997). Learning disabilities occurring concomitantly with linguistic differences. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 30, 321—332.
46.
Ortiz, A.A. (2002). Prevention and early intervention. In A. J. Artiles & A. A. Ortiz (Eds.), English language learners with special education needs: Identification, assessment, and instruction (pp. 31—48). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
47.
Ortiz, A.A., García, S.B., Holtzman, W.H., Jr. , Polyzoi, E., Snell, W.E., Jr., Wilkinson , C.Y., et al. ( 1985). Characteristics of limited English proficient Hispanic students in programs for the learning disabled: Implications for policy, practice, and research . Austin: University of Texas, Handicapped Minority Research Institute on Language Proficiency .
48.
Ortiz, A.A., & Kushner, M.I. (1997). Bilingualism and the possible impact on academic performance. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 6, 657—679.
49.
Ortiz, A.A., & Wilkinson, C.Y. (1991). Assessment and Intervention Model for the Bilingual Exceptional Student (AIM for the BESt). Teacher Education and Special Education, 14, 35—42.
50.
Ortiz, A.A., & Yates, J.R. (2002). Considerations in the assessment of English language learners referred to special education. In A. J. Artiles & A. A. Ortiz (Eds.), English language learners with special education needs: Identification, assessment, and instruction (pp. 65—85). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
51.
Padolsky, D. (2004, October). How many school-aged English language learners (ELLs) are there in the U.S.? Ask NCELA No. 1. Washington, DC: George Washington University, National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition and Language Instruction Educational Programs.
52.
Pysh, M.V., & Chalfant, J.C. (1992). Teacher assistance teams . In Educational approaches and program options for integrating students with disabilities: A decision tool (pp. 4.287—4.314). Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
53.
Robertson, P., Kushner, M.I., Starks, J., & Drescher, C. (1994). An update of participation rates of culturally and linguistically diverse students in special education: The need for a research and policy agenda. The Bilingual Special Education Perspective , 14(1), 3—9.
54.
Rock, M., & Zigmond, N. (2001). Intervention assistance: Is it substance or symbolism?Preventing School Failure, 45(4), 153—161.
55.
Santos, R.M., Fowler, S.A., Corso, R.M., & Bruns, D.A. (2000). Acceptance, acknowledgement, and adaptability: Selecting culturally and linguistically appropriate early childhood materials . Teaching Exceptional Children, 37(3), 14—22.
56.
Slavin, R.E., & Madden, N.A. (1989, February). What works for students at risk: A research synthesis. Educational Leadership, 46(5), 4—13.
57.
Sosa, A.S. (1997). Involving Hispanic parents in educational activities through collaborative relationships [Electronic version]. Bilingual Research Journal, 21(2—3), 103—111.
58.
Texas Education Agency. (2001). Comprehensive annual report on Texas public schools: A report to the 77th Texas legislature. Austin: Author .
59.
Texas Education Agency. (2004). 2003—2004 Academic excellence indicator system. Retrieved August 2, 2005, from http://www.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/aeis
Tigard-Tualatin School District 23J. (n.d.). EBS, EBIS, FSTS and Project Circuits: A summary of progress 2001—2003 . Tigard, OR: Author.
62.
Truscott, S.D., Cohen, C.E., Sams, D.P., Sanborn, K.J., & Frank, A.J. (2005). The current state(s) of prereferral intervention teams. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 130—140.
63.
Vaughn, S., Mathes, P.G., Linan-Thompson, S., & Francis, D.J. (2005). Teaching English language learners at risk for reading disabilities to read: Putting research to practice. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 58—67.
64.
Walberg, H.J., Bakalis, M.J., Bast, J.L., & Baer, S. (1989). Reconstructing the nation's worst schools. Phi Delta Kappan,70, 802—805.
65.
Wilkinson, C.Y., Ortiz, A.A., Robertson, P.M., & Kushner, M.I. (2004, November). Appropriate eligibility determinations for English language learners suspected of having reading-related learning disabilities: Linking school history, early intervention, referral, and assessment data. Paper presented at the National Center for Culturally Responsive Educational Systems Conference on English Language Learners Struggling to Learn: Emergent Research on Linguistic Differences and Learning Disabilities, Scottsdale, AZ.
66.
Willig, A.C., Swedo, J.J., & Ortiz, A.A. (1987). Characteristics of teaching strategies which result in high task engagement for exceptional limited English proficient students . Austin: University of Texas, Handicapped Minority Research Institute on Language Proficiency.
