The Need for Problem-Solving Teams

Beckerman, L. (2005). Building blocks for the new principal. Principal Leadership, 5, 43—47.

Bloom, B.S. (1980). The new direction in educational research: Alterable variables. Phi Delta Kappan, 61, 382—385.

Buck, G.H. , Polloway, E.A. , Smith-Thomas, A. , & Cook, K.W. (2003). Prereferral intervention processes: A survey of state practices. Exceptional Children, 69, 349—360.

Chalfant, J.C. , & Pysh, M.V. (1989). Teacher assistance teams: Five descriptive studies on 96 teams. Remedial and Special Education, 10(6), 49—58.

Chalfant, J.C. , Pysh, M.V. , & Moultrie, R. (1979). Teacher assistance teams: A model for within-building problem solving. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2, 85—96.

Ellis, A. (2001). Research on educational innovations (3rd ed.). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.

Gresham, F.M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In R. Bradley , L. Danielson , & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 531—547). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Hart, B. , & Risley, T.R. (1995). Meaningful di ferences in the everyday experiences of young American children. Baltimore: Brookes.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, H.R. 1350, 108 Cong., 2nd Sess.

Kovaleski, J.F. (2002). Best practices in operating pre-referral intervention teams. In J. G. A. Thomas (Ed.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 645—655). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.

Kovaleski, J.F. , Gickling, E.E. , Morrow, H. , & Swank, P.R. (1999). High versus low implementation of instructional support teams: A case for maintaining program fidelity. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 170—183.

Moats, L.C. (2004). Science, language, and imagination in the professional development of reading teachers. In P. M. V. Chhabra (Ed.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 269—285). Baltimore: Brookes .

National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching students to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instructions: Reports of the subgroups. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P.L. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425.

Rosenfield, S.A. , & Gravois, T.A. (1996). Instructional consultation teams: Collaborating for change. New York: Guilford Press .

Snow, C. E. , Burns, M. S. , & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading di ficulties in young children . Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

Sweet, R.W. (2004). The big picture: Where we are nationally on the reading front and how we got here. In P. M. V. Chhabra (Ed.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 13—44). Baltimore: Brookes .

Truscott, S.D. , Cohen, C.E. , Sama, D.P. , Sanborn, K.J. , & Frank, A.J. (2005). The current state(s) of prereferral intervention teams: A report from two national surveys. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 130—140.

Welch, M. , Brownell, K. , & Sheridan, S.M. (1999). What's the score and game plan on teaming in schools? A review of the literature on team teaching and school-based problem-solving teams. Remedial and Special Education , 20, 36—49.