This study provides descriptive data on first-grade reading proficiency of English learners in multiple-language settings. Using curriculum-based measurement of reading (CBM-R) to measure oral reading fluency (ORF) and a nonsense word— reading fluency (NWF) measure, weekly scores during the final 6 weeks of the first-grade school year indicated gains of approximately one word per minute each week on ORF and two words per minute each week on NWF. The results are very similar to the progress of non—English learners from previously documented studies of first-grade performance using CBM-R. Participating students experienced significant gains in both ORF and NWF in 6 weeks. By the end of the first grade, English learners in this study read a mean of 46 words per minute on the CBM-R. The correlation between the scores for ORF and NWF at the end of first grade was strong (r = .86). Weak correlations of fluency measures with student language proficiency and teacher ratings were found. Educational implications and future research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baker, S., Gersten, R., Haager, D., Goldenberg, C., & Dingle, M. (2003). First-grade reading instruction for English learners: An observational study. Final report. Eugene, OR: Pacific Research Institute.
2.
Baker, S.K., Plasencia-Peinado, J., & Lezcano-Lytle, V. (1998). The use of curriculum-based measurement with language-minority students. In M. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 175—213). New York: Guilford Press.
3.
Ballard, W.S., Dalton, E.F., & Tighe, P.L. (1995). IDEA oral language proficiency test in English (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Ballard and Tighe.
4.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan,80, 139—148.
5.
Chiappe, P., Siegel, L.S., & Wade-Woolsey, L. (2002). Linguistic diversity and the development of reading skills: A longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading., 6, 369—400.
6.
Deno, S.L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative . Exceptional Children, 52, 219—232.
7.
Deno, S.L. (1997). “Whether” thou goest: Perspectives on progress monitoring. In J. W. Lloyd , E. J. Kameenui, & D. Chard (Eds.), Issues in educating students with disabilities (pp. 77—100). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
Deno, S.L., Fuchs, L.S., & Marston, D.B., & Shin, J., (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 507—524.
9.
Deno, S.L., Mirkin, P.K., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36—45.
10.
Droop, M., & Verhoeven, L.T. (2003). Language proficiency and reading ability in first- and second-language learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 78—103.
11.
Englert, C. (1984). Effective direct instruction practices in special education settings. Remedial and Special Education, 5, 38—47.
12.
Espin, C.A., & Foegen, A. (1996). Validity of general outcome measures for predicting secondary students' performance on content area tasks. Exceptional Children, 62, 497—514.
13.
Espin, C.A., & Tindal, G. (1998). Curriculum-based measurement for secondary students . In M. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 214—253). New York: Guilford Press.
14.
Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Beeler, T., Winikates, D., & Fletcher, J. (1997). Early interventions for children with reading problems: Study designs and preliminary findings. Learning Disabilities: A MultiDisciplinary Journal, 8, 63—71.
15.
Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Shaywitz, S.E., Shaywitz, B., & Fletcher, J.M. (1997). The case for early reading intervention. In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition: Implications for intervention and dyslexia (pp. 103—115). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53, 199—208.
18.
Fuchs, L., & Fuchs, D. (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21, 45—58.
19.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C.L. (1990). Curriculum-based measurement: A standardized, long-term goal approach to monitoring student progress. Academic Therapy, 25, 615—632.
20.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M.K., & Jenkins, J.R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239—256.
21.
Graves, A., Gersten, R., & Haager, D. (2004). Literacy instruction in multiple-language first-grade classrooms: Linking student outcomes to observed instructional practice. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19, 262—272.
22.
Kaminski, R.A., & Good, R.H., III. (1998). Assessing early literacy skills in a problem-solving model: Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills . In M. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 113—142). New York: Guilford Press.
23.
Marston, D. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18—78). New York: Guilford Press.
24.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
25.
Shinn, M.R., & Bamato, S. (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement: “Big ideas” and avoiding confusion. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 1— 31). New York: Guilford .
26.
Shinn, M.R., Rosenfield, S., & Knutson, N. (1989). Curriculum-based assessment: A comparison of models . School Psychology Review, 18, 299—316.
27.
Stanovich, P.J., & Jordan, A. (1998). Canadian teachers' and principals' beliefs about inclusive education as predictors of effective teaching in heterogeneous classrooms . The Elementary School Journal,
28.
Tikunoff, W.J., Ward, B.A., van Broekhuizen, L.D., Romero, M., Castaneda, L.V., Lucas, T., et al. (1991). Final report: A descriptive study of significant features of exemplary special alternative instructional programs. Los Alamitos, CA: Southwest Regional Educational Laboratory .
29.
Wade-Woolley, L., & Siegel, L.S. (1997). The spelling performance of ESL and native speakers of English as a function of reading skill. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 387—406.
30.
Weber, R., & Longhi-Chirlin, T. (2001). Beginning in English: The growth of linguistic and literate abilities in Spanish-speaking first-graders . Reading Research and Instruction, 41(1), 19—50.
