The first portion of this article describes the development and validation of a classroom observation measure. The goal of the measure was to assess the quality of reading instruction provided to first-grade English learners. We report the internal consistency reliability, interrater reliability, the development of empirically derived subscales, and the criterion-related validity of the subscales. The latter was moderately high for three of the six subscales (range = .62—.65) and moderate for the three others (range = .49—.57). The second portion of this article includes a contrasted groups analysis of the four classes with the lowest and highest growth in reading. We conclude with a presentation of the major themes and issues that emerged in the qualitative field notes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, L.M., Evertson, C.M., & Brophy, J.E. (1979). An experimental study of effective teaching in first-grade reading groups. The Elementary School Journal , 79, 193—223.
2.
August, D., & Hakuta, K. (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority children . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
3.
Baker, S., Gersten, R., Dimino, J., & Griffiths, R. (2004). The sustained use of research-based instructional practice. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 5—24.
4.
Baker, S.K., Gersten, R., Haager, D., Goldenberg, C., & Dingle, M. (2003). First grade reading instruction for English learners: An observational study: Long Beach, CA. Instructional Research Group.
5.
California Department of Education. (1999). Reading/language arts framework for California public schools, kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento, CA: Author.
6.
California Reading and Literature Project. (1999). Reading professional development institute focusing on results, K—3. San Diego: Author.
7.
Carlo, M.S., August, D., McLaughlin, B., Snow, C.E., Dressler, C., Lippman, D., et al. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English-language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms . Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 188—215.
8.
Chiappe, P., Siegel, L., & Wade-Woolley, L. (2002). Linguistic diversity and the development of reading skills: A longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 369—400.
9.
Droop, M., & Verhoeven, L.T. (2003). Language proficiency and reading ability in first- and second-language learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 78—103.
10.
Echevarria, J., Vogt, M., & Short, D.J. (2000). Making content comprehensible for English-language learners: The SIOP model. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
11.
Englert, C. (1984). Effective direct instruction practices in special education settings. Remedial and Special Education, 5(2), 38—47.
12.
Fitzgerald, J., Garcia, G., & Jimenez, R.T. (2000). How will bilingual/ESL programs in literacy change in the next millennium?Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 520—523.
13.
Foorman, B., Francis, D., Fletcher, J., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37— 55.
14.
Gersten, R. (1999). Lost opportunities: Challenges confronting four teachers of English-language learners. The Elementary School Journal, 100, 37— 56.
15.
Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2000). What we know about effective instructional practices for English-language learners. Exceptional Children, 66, 454— 470.
16.
Gersten, R., & Baker, S.K. (2003). English-language learners with learning disabilities . In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 94—109). New York : Guilford.
17.
Gersten, R., Carnine, D., Zoref, L., & Cronin, D. (1986). A multifaceted study of change in seven inner city schools. The Elementary School Journal, 86, 257—276.
18.
Gersten, R., & Jiménez, R., (1994). A delicate balance: Enhancing literacy instruction for students of English as a second language. The Reading Teacher, 47, 438—449.
19.
Geva, E., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Schuster, B. (2000). Understanding differences in word recognition skills of ESL children. Annals of Dyslexia, 50, 123—154.
20.
Gunn, B., Biglan, A., Smolkowski, K., & Ary, D. (2000). The efficacy of supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students in early elementary school. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 90—103.
21.
Haager, D., & Windmueller, M. (2001). Early literacy intervention for English language learners at-risk for learning disabilities: Student outcomes in an urban school. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 235—250.
22.
Jiménez, R., & Gersten, R. (1999). Lessons and dilemmas derived from the literacy instruction of two Latina/o teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 265—301.
23.
Kaminski, R.A., & Good, R.H. (1996). Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 25, 215—227.
24.
Leinhardt, G., Zigmond, N., & Cooley, W. (1981). Reading instruction and its effects. American Educational Research Journal, 18, 343—361.
25.
Lesaux, N., & Siegel, L. (2003). The development of reading in children who speak English as a second language. Developmental Psychology, 39, 1005—1019.
26.
Linan-Thompson, S., Vaughn, S., Hickman-Davis, P., & Kouzekanani, K. (2003). Effectiveness of supplemental reading instruction for second-grade English language learners with reading difficulties. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 221—238.
27.
Merickel, A., Linquanti, R., Parrish, T., Perez, M., Eaton, M., & Esra, P. (2003). E fects of the implementation of proposition 227 on the education of English learners, K—12: Year 3 report. American Institutes for Research and WestEd.
28.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
29.
Ramírez, J.D. (1992). Executive summary: Longitudinal study of structured English immersion strategy, early-exit and late-exit transitional bilingual education programs for language-minority children. Bilingual Research Journal, 16(1—2), 1—62.
30.
Rousseau, M.K., Tam, B.K.Y., & Ramnarain, R. (1993). Increasing reading proficiency of language-minority students with speech and language impairments. Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 254—271.
31.
Snow, C.S., Burns, S.M., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading di ficulties in young children . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
32.
Stallings, J., & Kaskowitz, D. (1974). Follow through classroom observation evaluation 1972—1973 (SRI Project URU-7370). Stanford, CA: Stanford Research Institute.
33.
Stanovich, P.J., & Jordan, A. (1998). Canadian teachers' and principals' beliefs about inclusive education as predictors of effective teaching in heterogeneous classrooms . The Elementary School Journal, 98, 221— 238.
34.
Tikunoff, W.J., Ward, B.A., van Broekhuizen, L.D., Romero, M., Castaneda, L.V., Lucas, T., et al. (1991). Final report: A descriptive study of significant features of exemplary special alternative instructional programs. Los Alamitos, CA: Southwest Regional Educational Laboratory .
35.
Valentine, J.C., & Cooper, H. (2003). What Works Clearinghouse Study Design and Implementation Assessment Device (Version 1.0). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
36.
West, J., Denton, K., & Germino-Hausken, E. (2000). America's kindergartners (NCES 2000-070). Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
