The ParaMet training program was jointly established by an urban university, a disability service provider, and an urban public school system to assist the school system in complying with the paraeducator training and supervision requirements of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Amendments of 1997 and, eventually, the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001. This article analyzes the strengths and needs of the first 2 cohorts of paraeducators accepted into the ParaMet program. The findings indicate that the paraeducators, who are predominantly from the minority group served by the local public schools, bring unique strengths to the special education teams. However, many will also require extraordinary academic supports to be successful in undergraduate-level training.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beale, E.W. (2001). Analysis of state standards for paraprofessionals. Journal of InstructionalPsychology, 28, 244—248.
2.
Birman, B.F., Desimone, L., Porter, A.C., & Garet, M.S. (2000). Designing professional development that works . Educational Leadership, 57(8), 28—32.
3.
Blair, B.G. (1999). Paraeducator career ladders: A dean's perspective . Education, 119(1), 2—3.
4.
Brandick, S. (2001). Paraeducators' career ladders: Step up the teacher supply. Retrieved August 15, 2002, from http://www.eddigest.com
5.
Brown, J.I., Fishco, V.V., & Hanna, G. (1993). Nelson-Denny reading test, forms G & H. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
6.
Brown, J.W., Hughes, G.B., & Vance, P.L. (1999). The new face of teaching in the 21st century: Are we ready for the challenge?The Journal of Negro Education , 68, 241—244.
7.
Comer, J., & Maholmes, V. (1999). Creating schools of child development and education in the USA: Teacher preparation for urban schools. Journal of Education for Teaching, 25(1), 3—15.
8.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2002). CEC performance-based standards: Paraeducators. Retrieved January 9, 2002, from http://www.cec.sped.org/ps/perf_based_stds/paraeducators_03-12-01.html
9.
Daniels, V.I., & McBride, A. (2001). Paraeducators as critical team members: Redefining roles and responsibilities. NASSP Bulletin, 85(623), 66—74.
10.
Downing, J.E., Ryndak, D.L., & Clark, D. (2000). Paraeducators in inclusive classrooms: Their own perceptions. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 171—181.
11.
Ellis, D. (2003). Becoming a master student (10th ed.). New York: Houghton Mifflin .
12.
Eubanks, S. (2001, December). Licensure programs for paraeducators. ERIC Digest. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED460127)
13.
French, N.K. (1998). Working together: Resource teachers and paraeducators . Remedial and Special Education, 19, 357—368.
14.
French, N.K. (1999a). Paraeducators: Who are they and what do they do?Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(1), 65—69.
Genzuk, M. (1997, April). Diversifying the teaching force: Preparing paraeducators as teachers. ERIC Digest. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED406362)
17.
Genzuk, M., & Baca, R. (1998). The paraeducator-to-teacher pipeline. Education and Urban Society, 31(1), 73—88.
18.
Giangreco, M.R., Edelman, S., Luiselli, T.E., & MacFarland, S.Z.C. (1997). Helping or hovering? Effects of instructional assistant proximity on students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 7—18.
19.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
20.
Haselkorn, D., & Fideler, E. (1996). Breaking the class ceiling: Paraeducator pathways to teaching. Belmont, MA: Recruiting New Teachers.
21.
Hudson, M.J. (1998). Linking school and community to build national recruitment and preparation programs for teachers of color. Education and Urban Society, 31(1), 62—73.
22.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (1990) (amended 1997)
23.
Katsiyannis, A., Hodge, J., & Lanford, A. (2000). Paraeducators: Legal and practice considerations . Remedial and Special Education, 21, 297—304.
24.
Marks, S.U., Schrader, C., & Levine, M. (1999). Paraeducator experiences in inclusive settings: Helping, hovering or holding their own?Exceptional Children , 65, 315—328.
25.
McGowan, J., & Brandick, S. (1999). Developing a paraeducators' career ladder as a comprehensive approach for training select future teachers. Education, 119(1), 5—14.
26.
Moshoyannis, T. (1999). The paraprofessional academy. Retrieved November 19, 2002, from http://www.nrcpara.org/resources/careerladder/clarticle5.shtml
27.
Moshoyannis, T., Pickett, A.L., & Granick, L. (1999). The evolving roles and education/training needs of teacher and paraprofessional teams in New York CityPublic Schools. New York: City University of New York, Graduate Center, Center for Advanced Study in Education, Paraprofessional Academy.
28.
National Center on Education Statistics. ( 2002). Digest of education statistics, 2001, List of Tables, Table 82. Retrieved November 15, 2002, from http://nces.ed.gov//pubs2002/digest2001/tables/dt082.asp
29.
National Education Association. (1997). NEA national K—12 educational support personnel membership study . Washington, DC: Author.
30.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq. (2002)
31.
Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. ( 2001). Assessment: Scoring 6+1 trait writing. Retrieved on September 19, 2002, from http://www.nwrel.org/assessment/scoring.asp?odelay=3&d=1
32.
Pickett, A.L. (1999, December). Paraeducators: Factors that influence their performance, development and supervision. ERIC Digest. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 438636).
33.
Railsback, J., Bracken, R., & Schmidt, K. (2002). Working together for successful paraeducator services: A guide for paraeducators, teachers, and principals. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
34.
Recruiting New Teachers. (2000). A guide to today's teacher recruitment challenges. Belmont, MA: Author.
35.
Riggs, C.G., & Mueller, P.H. (2001). Employment and utilization of paraeducators in inclusive settings. The Journal of Special Education, 35, 54—62.
36.
Rueda, R.S., & Monzo, L.D. (2000). Research report: Apprenticeship for teaching: Professional development issues surrounding the collaborative relationship between teachers and paraeducators. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence.
37.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002, November 15). Title I paraprofessionals: Draft non-regulatory guidance. No Child Left Behind. Washington, DC: Author.
38.
Villegas, A.M., & Clewell, B.C. (1998). Increasing teacher diversity by tapping the paraprofessional pool. Theory Into Practice, 37, 121—130.
39.
Wallace, T., & Gerlach, K. (2001, June). State level initiatives related to training and supervision of paraeducators. Quick Turn Around Forum , 1—10.
40.
Wallace, T., Shin, J., Bartholomay, T., & Stall, B.J. (2001). Knowledge and skills for teachers supervising the work of paraprofessionals. Exceptional Children, 67, 520—533.
