Special education teachers in today's workplace must show “competence at teaching everything” (Mastropieri, 2001). They work in different settings, teaching and adapting content across all levels. Added to this complexity are reform efforts that are driving major changes in the entire special education system, including service delivery models and teacher roles. However, without an understanding of teachers' current roles and responsibilities, we cannot know if such recommendations are feasible or how they would change the world of practice. This study surveyed high school special education teachers to investigate their daily work lives. In general, participants taught courses in several different content areas, primarily in self-contained settings. They also held numerous nonteaching roles. All roles and responsibilities were independent of the number of years taught and of teachers' educational backgrounds. Implications for transforming teachers' work lives in an effort to increase student outcomes are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alliance for Excellent Education. (2004). Tapping the potential: Retaining and developing high-quality teachers . Washington, DC: Author
2.
Belden Russonello & Stewart. (2003). Expectations, achievements, and challenges: Teaching special education students . Washington, DC: Author .
3.
Boe, E.E., Cook, L.H., Bobbitt, S.A., & Terbanian, G. (1998). The shortage of fully certified teachers in special and general education. Teacher Education and Special Education , 21, 132—149.
4.
Boyer, L., & Mainzer, R. (2003). Who's teaching students with disabilities?Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(6), 8—11.
5.
Carlson, E., Brauen, M., Kalein, S., Schroll, K., & Willig, S.W. (2002). Study of personnel needs in special education: Key findings. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
6.
Coleman, M.R. (2001). Conditions of teaching children with exceptional learning needs: The bright futures report (EDO-EC-01-8). Arlington, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education.
7.
Conderman, G.J., & Katsiyannis, A. (2002). Instructional issues and practices in secondary special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 23, 167—179.
8.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2001). New study on special education working conditions. CEC Today , 8, 1.
9.
Edgar, E., & Polloway, E. (1994). Education for adolescents with disabilities: Curriculum and placement issues. The Journal of Special Education, 27, 438—452.
Gersten, R., Keating, T., Yovanoff, P., & Harniss, M.K. (2001). Working in special education: Factors that enhance special educators' intent to stay. Exceptional Children, 67, 549—567.
12.
Griffin, C.C., Winn, J.A., Otis-Wilborn, A., & Kilgore, K.L. (2002). New teacher induction in special education. Retrieved October 7, 2002, from www.coe.ufl.edu/copsse/index.htm
13.
Heumann, J.E. (2000). Questions and answers about provisions in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997 related to students with disabilities and state and district-wide assessments. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.
14.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
15.
Ingersoll, R. (2001). The realities of out-of-field teaching. Educational Leadership, 58(8), 42—45.
16.
Kennedy, V., & Burstein, N. (2004). An induction program for special education teachers . Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 444—447.
17.
Kohler, P.D., & Rusch, F.R. (1995). Secondary educational programs and transition perspectives. In M. C. Wang, M. C. Reynolds, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of special and remedial education: Research and practice (2nd ed., pp. 107—130). New York: Elsevier Science.
18.
Lortie, D.C. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Mastropieri, M.A. (2001). Is the glass half full or half empty? Challenges encountered by first-year special education teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 35, 66—74.
20.
McKenzie, R.G. (1995). Special educators as secondary content teachers: How justifiable?Teacher Education and Special Education, 18, 275— 280.
21.
McLaughlin, M., & Thurlow, M. (2003). Educational accountability and students with disabilities: Issues and challenges. Educational Policy, 17, 431—451.
22.
Menlove, R., Garnes, L., & Salzberg, C. (2004). Why special educators leave and where they go . Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 373— 383.
23.
Michigan High School Athletic Association. ( 2002). 2002—2003 Handbook. Lansing : Author.
24.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq. (2002)
25.
President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: Author.
26.
Pugach, M.C., & Warger, C.L. (2001). Curriculum matters: Raising expectations for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 194—196.
27.
Sabornie, E.J., & deBenttencourt, L.U. (1997). Teaching students with mild disabilities at the secondary level. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
28.
Salant, P., & Dillman, D.A. (1994). How to conduct your own survey. New York: Wiley.
29.
Schloss, P., Smith, M.A., & Schloss, C.N. (2001). Instructional methods for secondary students with learning and behavior problems (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon .
30.
SPeNse. (2002). Key findings. Study of Personnel Needs in Special Education. Retrieved March 31, 2003, from www.spense.org
31.
U. S. Department of Education. (2002). Twenty-fourth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
32.
Wisniewski, L., & Gargiulo, R.M. (1997). Occupational stress and burnout among special educators: A review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 325—346.
