Migrant Students with Limited English Proficiency

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy of the computer-assisted intervention program known as Fast ForWord Language^™ in a sample of migrant students in Grades 1 through 6 who were native Spanish speakers. Fast ForWord Language^™ combines intensive training in multiple receptive English language skills with adaptive acoustic waveform lengthening and amplification to purportedly accelerate the English language learning skills of children who are nonnative English language speakers. Students either were randomly assigned to a treatment or no-contact control condition or were matched on grade, English language proficiency, and nonverbal IQ. All students were assessed in five domains before and immediately after the 4- to 8-week intervention: (a) spoken English language proficiency; (b) oral language competency; (c) phonological awareness; (d) basic reading skills; and (e) classroom behavior. Except for performance on a measure of sight-word recognition, on which children in the treatment group achieved a significantly greater gain than those in the control group, changes in test scores from pretest to posttest were equivalent for the two groups. However, when students who were least fluent in spoken English in each group were compared, the children in the treatment group demonstrated superior gains in expressive language, sight-word recognition, and pseudoword decoding. Thus, Fast ForWord Language^™ had a substantial, albeit limited impact on the oral language skills and reading performance of migrant children in this study. However, due to methodological weaknesses and limited treatment fidelity, the study results must be interpreted cautiously.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

August, D. , & Hakuta, K. (Eds.). (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority children: A research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 408 377)

Baetens-Beardsmore, H. (1986). Bilingualism: Basic principles. London: Treto.

Brown, L. , Sherbenou, R.J. , & Johnsen, S.K. (1997). Test of nonverbal intelligence (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

Burgemeister, B.B. , Blum, L. , & Lorge, I. (1972). Columbia mental maturity scale (3rd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Carrillo, M. (1994). Development of phonological awareness and reading acquisition: A study in Spanish language. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 279—298.

Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (1995). Oral and written language scales. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

Cole, K.N. , Coggins, T.E. , & Vanderstoep, C. (1999). The influence of language/cognitive profile on discourse intervention outcome. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 61—67.

Collier, V.P. (1989). How long? A synthesis of research on academic achievement in a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 509—531.

Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education. San Diego: College-Hill Press.

10.

DeAvila, E.A. , & Duncan, S.E. (1990). Language assessment scales—Oral. New York: Macmillan/ McGraw-Hill .

11.

Fey, M.E. , Long, S.H. , & Cleave, P.L. (1994). Reconsideration of IQ criteria in the definition of specific language impairment. In R. V. Watkins & M. L. Rice (Eds.), Specific language impairments in children (Vol. 4, pp. 161—178). Baltimore: Brookes.

12.

Gillam, R.B. (1999). Computer-assisted language intervention using Fast ForWord®: Theoretical and empirical considerations for clinical decision-making . Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 363—370.

13.

Gillam, R.B. , Frome Loeb, D. , & Friel-Patti, S. (2001). Looking back: A summary of five exploratory studies of Fast ForWord. American Journal of Speech—Language Pathology, 10, 269—273.

14.

Gonzales, J.E.J. , & Valle, I.H. (2000). Word identification and reading disorders in the Spanish language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 44—60.

15.

Gresham, F.M. , & Elliott, S.N. (1990). Social skills rating system. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

16.

Hook, P.E. , Macaruso, P. , & Jones, S. (2001). Efficacy of Fast ForWord training on facilitating acquisition of reading skills by children with reading difficulties—A longitudinal study. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 75— 96.

17.

Hu, C.F. , & Catts, H.W. (1998). The role of phonological processing in early reading ability: What we can learn from Chinese. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 55—79.

18.

Lindamood, C.H. , & Lindamood, P.C. (1979). Lindamood auditory conceptualization test. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

19.

McLaughlin, B. (1992). Myths and misconceptions about second language learning: What every teacher needs to unlearn (Educational Practice Report No. 5). Santa Cruz, CA: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.

20.

Merzenich, M.M. , Jenkins, W.M. , Johnston, P. , Schreiner, C. , Miller, S.L. , & Tallal, P. (1996). Temporal processing deficits of language-learning impaired children ameliorated by training. Science, 271, 77—81.

21.

Nye, C. , Foster, S.H. , & Seaman, D. (1987). Effectiveness of language intervention with the language/learning disabled. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 348—357.

22.

O'Connor, R. (2000). Increasing the intensity of intervention in kindergarten and first grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice , 15, 43—54.

23.

Roberts, C.A. (1995). Bilingual education program models: A framework for understanding. The Bilingual Research Journal, 19, 369—378.

24.

Studdert-Kennedy, M. , Liberman, A.M. , Brady, S.A. , Fowler, A.E. , Mody, M. , & Shankweiler, D.P. (1995). Lengthened formant transitions are irrelevant to the improvement of speech and language impairments. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, SR119/120, 35—38.

25.

Swanson, H.L. , & Hoskyn, M. (1999). Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68, 277—321.

26.

Tallal, P. , Miller, S.L. , Bedi, G. , Byma, G. , Wang, X. , Nagarajan, S.S. , et al. (1996). Language comprehension in language-learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech. Science, 271, 81—84.

27.

Tallal, P. , Miller, S.L. , & Fitch, R.H. (1993). Neurobiological basis of speech: A case for the preeminence of temporal processing. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 682, 27—47.

28.

Tallal, P. , Miller, S.L. , Jenkins, W.M. , & Merzenich, M.M. (1997). The role of temporal processing in developmental language-based learning disorders: Research and clinical implications. In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 49—66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

29.

Thomas, W. , & Collier, V.P. (1997). School e fectiveness for language minority students . Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.

30.

Tomblin, J.B. , Morris, H.L. , & Spriestersbach, D.C. (1994). Diagnosis in speech—language pathology. San Diego: Singular.

31.

Torgesen, J.K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 55—64.

32.

Troia, G.A. , & Whitney, S.D. (2003). A close look at the efficacy of Fast ForWord Language for children with academic weaknesses. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 465—494.

33.

Veale, T.K. (1999). Targeting temporal processing deficits through Fast ForWord®: Language therapy with a new twist. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 345—352.

34.

Woodcock, R.W. , & Johnson, M.B. (1990). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery—revised . Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources .

35.

Woodcock, R.W. , & Muñoz-Sandoval, A.F. (1993). Woodcock-Muñoz language survey. Itasca, IL: Riverside.