This study examined factors predictive of dropping out of high school for students with learning disabilities (LD) and mental retardation (MR). The sample was composed of 228 students with LD or MR who dropped out of school and 228 students with LD or MR who had not dropped out. Two sets of predictor variables (student demographics and interview responses) were analyzed using hierarchical logistic regression analysis in terms of their relationship to the outcome variable of dropout. The variables retained in the final model were learning disability, helpful person, helpful class, and general preparation. Specifically, the probability of dropping out for a student with LD who did not feel he or she was being prepared for life after high school and did not identify a helpful class and a helpful person was .86, compared to .16 for a student with MR who did find a particular class and person helpful and felt that school was preparing him or her for desired outcomes. Implications of the results are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alabama State Department of Education. (n.d.). Alabama Student Tracking System administration manual. Montgomery: Author.
2.
Alabama State Department of Education. (n.d.) Rules of the Alabama State Board of Education, State Department of Education (CH. 290-8-9, Special Education Services). Montgomery: Author.
3.
Alspaugh, J.W. (1998). The relationship of school-to-school transitions and school size to high school dropout rates. High School Journal, 81, 154— 121.
4.
Benz, M., Lindstrom, L., & Yovanoff, P. (2000). Improving graduation and employment rates that predict postschool success for students with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 66, 509—529.
5.
Blackorby, J., & Wagner, M. (1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399—413.
6.
Browning, P., Rabren, K., Whetstone, M., & Dunn, C. (2001). An Alabama tracking system for youth and young adults with disabilities. In P. Browning, C. Cox, K. Rabren, & S. Tew-Washburn (Eds.), Transition in Alabama: A profile of commitment (pp. 221—229). (Available from Transition Leadership Institute, Department of Rehabilitation and Special Education, Auburn University, Auburn, AL36849)
7.
Cross, T., Darby, B., & D'Alonzo, B. (1990). School drop-out prevention: A multifaceted program for the improvement of adolescent employability, academic achievement, and personal identity. Career Development of the Exceptional Individual, 13, 83—94 .
8.
deBettencourt, L. U., Zigmond, N., & Thornton, H. (1989). Follow-up of postsecondary-age rural learning disabled graduates and dropouts. Exceptional Children, 56, 40—49.
9.
Edgar, E. (1987). Secondary programs in special education: Are many of them justifiable?Exceptional Children, 53, 555—561.
10.
Ensminger, M.E., & Slusarcick, A.L. (1992). Paths to high school graduation or dropout: A longitudinal study of a first-grade cohort. Sociology of Education, 65, 95—113.
11.
Field, S., & Hoffman, A. (1996). Steps to self-determination. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
12.
Grayson, T.E. (1998). Dropout prevention and special services. In F. R. Rusch & J. G. Chadsey (Eds.), Beyond high school: Transition from school to work (pp. 77—98). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
13.
Habel, J., Bloom, L.A., Ray, M.S., & Bacon, E. (1999). Consumer reports: What students with behavior disorders say about school. Remedial and Special Education , 20, 93—105.
14.
Halpern, A., Herr, C., Doren, B., & Wolf, N. (2000). Next STEP student transition and educational planning (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
15.
Hasazi, S., Hock, M., & Cravedi-Cheng, L. (1992). Vermont's post school indicators: Using satisfaction and post school outcomes data for program improvement . In F. Rush, L. DeStefano, J. Chadsey-Rush, J. A. Phelps, & E. M. Szymanski (Eds.), Transition from school to adult life:
16.
Models, linkages, and policy (pp. 485—508). Champaign, IL: Sycamore. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq
17.
Kortering, L.J., & Braziel, P.M. (1999a). School dropout from the perspective of former students: Implications for secondary special education programs. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 78—83.
18.
Kortering, L.J., & Braziel, P.M. (1999b). Staying in school: The perspective of ninth-grade students. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 106—113.
19.
Kortering, L., Haring, N., & Klockars, A. (1992). The identification of high-school dropouts identified as learning disabled: Evaluating the utility of a discriminant analysis function . Exceptional Children, 58, 422—436.
20.
Kortering, L.J., Konold, T.R., & Glutting, J. (1998). Comparing the reasons for coming to school among high school dropouts and nondropouts. The Journal of At-Risk Issues, 5(1), 10—15.
21.
Lichtenstein, S., & Zantol-Wiener, K. (1988). Special education dropouts (ERIC Digest #451). Reston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted Children. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 295 395)
22.
Lovitt, T.C., Plavins, M., & Cushing, S. (1999). What do pupils with disabilities have to say about their experience in high school?Remedial and Special Education , 20, 67—76, 83.
23.
MacMillan, D.L. (1991). Hidden youth: Dropouts from special education . Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
24.
Martin, J.E., & Huber Marshall, L. (1994). ChoiceMaker self-determination transition assessment and curriculum. Colorado Springs : University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, Center for Educational Research.
25.
McWilliams, A.E., Everett, P., & Bass, M.L. (2000). A model of underlying influences on students' decisions to drop out. The Journal of At-Risk Issues, 7(1), 42—50.
26.
Mensch, B.S., & Kandel, D.B. (1988). Dropping out of high school and drug involvement . Sociology of Education, 61, 95—113.
27.
Mouton, S.G., Hawkins, J., McPherson, R.H., & Copley, J. (1996). School attachment: Perspectives of low-attached high school students. Educational Psychology, 16, 297—304.
28.
National Center for Education Statistics. ( 2001, November). Statistical analysis report: Dropout rates in the United States: 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement .
29.
National Longitudinal Transition Study. (n.d.). A summary of findings. Retrieved November 4, 2002, from http://www.sri.com/policy/cehs/nlts/nltssum.html
30.
Repetto, J.B., Pankaskie, S.A., De Palma-Hankins, A., Schwartz, S.E., & Perry, L. (1997). Promising practices in dropout prevention and transition for students with mild disabilities. The Journal of At-Risk Issues, 4(1), 19—29.
31.
Scanlon, D., & Mellard, D.F. (2002). Academic and participation profiles of school-age dropouts with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children,68, 239—258.
32.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1994). Educational attainment in the United States: March 1993 and 1992. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration.
33.
U.S. Department of Education (2002). Twenty-third annual report to Congress on the implementation of Public Law 101-476: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
34.
Van Reusen, A., Bos, C., Schumaker, J., & Deshler, D. (2002). The self-advocacy strategy for education and transition planning (2nd ed.). Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
35.
Wagner, M. (1991). Dropouts with disabilities: What do we know? What can we do? A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
36.
Wehmeyer, M., & Kelchner, K. (1995). Whose future is it anyway? A student directed transition planning process. Arlington, TX: ARC.
37.
Wolman, C., Bruininks, R., & Thurlow, M.L. (1989). Dropouts and dropout programs: Implications for special education. Remedial and Special Education, 10(5), 6—20.
