Recent consensus documents are reviewed to define research-based practices in early reading instruction. Examples of professional development that incorporates research-based practices are provided, with particular reference to the Texas Reading Initiative and the authors' research project in Houston and in Washington, DC. Data relating gains in teacher knowledge, ratings of teaching effectiveness, and student achievement are presented. Conditions essential to sustaining and scaling research-based reading instruction are discussed and major obstacles identified.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
August, D., Carlo, M., Lively, T., Lippman, D., McLaughlin, B., & Snow, C. (1999, April). Enhancing vocabulary knowledge and reading performance in English-language learners. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Association, Montreal, Canada.
2.
Bear, D.R., Templeton, S., Invernizzi, M., & Johnston, F. (1996). Words their way. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
Beck, I.L., & McKeown, M.G. (1991). Conditions of vocabulary acquisition. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 789—814). New York: Longman.
4.
Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., Hamilton, R.L., & Kucan, L. (1997). Questioning the author. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
5.
Biemiller, A., & Slonim, N. (2001). Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition . Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 498—520.
6.
Birman, B.F., Desimone, L., Porter, A.C., & Garet, M.S. (2000). Designing professional development that works . Educational Leadership, 57(8), 28—33.
7.
Bos, C., Mather, N., Dickson, S., Podhajski, B., & Chard, D. (2001). Educators' perceptions and knowledge of early reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 97—120.
8.
Carnine, D.W., Silbert, J., & Kameenui, E.J. (1997). Direct instruction reading (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
Clay, M. (1993). Reading recovery: A guidebook for teachers in training. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann .
10.
Cunningham, A.E., Perry, K.E., Stanovich, K.E., Stanovich, P.J., & Chappell, M. (2001, June). Is teachers' knowledge of important declarative knowledge of reading well calibrated?Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Boulder, CO.
11.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Post, L. (2000). Inequality in teaching and schooling: Supporting high quality teaching and leadership in low income schools. In R. D. Kahlenberg (Ed.), A nation at risk: Preserving public education as an engine for social mobility (pp. 127—167). New York: Century Foundation Press.
12.
Denton, C.A., Foorman, B.R., & Mathes, P.G. (2003). Schools that “beat the odds”: Implications for reading instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 258—261.
13.
Dickinson, D.K., & Sprague, K.E. (2001). The nature and impact of early childhood care environments on the language and early literacy development of children from low-income families. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 263—280). New York: Guilford Press.
Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M.T., & Moody, S.W. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology , 92, 605—619.
16.
Fletcher, J.M., Foorman, B.R., Boudousquie, A., Barnes, M., Schatschneider, C., & Francis, D.J. (2002). Assessment of reading and learning disabilities: A research-based, treatment-oriented approach. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 27—63.
17.
Foorman, B.R., Breier, J.I., & Fletcher, J.M. (in press). Interventions aimed at improving reading success: An evidence-based approach. Developmental Neuropsychology.
18.
Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Chen, D.T., Carlson, C., Moats, L., Francis, D., & Fletcher, J. (2003). The necessity of the alphabetic principle to phonemic awareness instruction. Reading and Writing, 16, 289—324.
19.
Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Chen, D.T., Schatschneider, C., & Moats, L.C. (2001, June). Does writing instruction improve reading?Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Scientific Study of Reading, Boulder, CO.
20.
Foorman, B.R., & Schatschneider, C. (2001). Classroom prevention through differentiated instruction: Response to Jenkins and O'Connor. White Paper Response: LD Summit Aug. 27-28, 2001 . Washington, DC: Office of Special Education, U.S. Department of Education.
21.
Foorman, B.R., & Schatschneider, C. (2003). Measurement of teaching practices during reading/language arts instruction and its relationship to student achievement. In S. Vaughn & K. Briggs (Eds.), Reading in the classroom: Systems for observation of teaching and learning (pp. 1—30). Baltimore: Brookes.
22.
Foorman, B.R., Seals, L., Anthony J., & Pollard-Durodola, S. (2003). Vocabulary enrichment program for third and fourth grade African American students: Description, implementation, and impact. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading di ficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 419—441). Timonium, MD: York Press.
23.
Foorman, B.R., & Torgesen, J.K. (2001). Critical elements of classroom and small-group instruction promote reading success in all children. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16(4), 202—211.
24.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Mathes, P.G., & Simmons, D.C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to academic diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174—206.
25.
Gersten, R., Chard, D., & Baker, S. (2000). Factors enhancing sustained use of research-based instructional practices. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 33(5), 445—457.
Hart, B., & Risley, T.R. (1995). Meaningful di ferences in the everyday experiences of young American children. Baltimore: Brookes.
28.
Hoffman, J.V. (1991). Teacher and school effects in learning to read . In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 911—950). New York: Longman.
29.
Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities. New York : Crown Publishers.
30.
Lindamood, P., & Lindamood, P. (1998). Lindamood phoneme sequencing (LIPS) program (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
31.
Little, J.W. (1993). Teacher's professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 15(2), 129—151.
32.
McCutchen, D., Abbott, R.D., Green, L.B., Beretvas, S.N., Cox, S., Potter, N.S., et al. (2002). Beginning literacy: Links among teacher knowledge, teacher practice, and student learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 69—86.
33.
McCutchen, D., & Berninger, V. (1999). Those who know, teach well: Helping teachers master literacy-related subject matter knowledge. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14(4), 215—226.
34.
McGuinness, C., & McGuinness, G. (1998). Reading reflex. New York: Free Press.
35.
McLaughlin, M.W. (1994). Strategic sites for teachers' professional development . In P. P. Grimmett & J. Neufeld (Eds.), Teachers' struggle for authentic development (pp. 31—51). New York: Teachers College Press.
36.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction . National Institute of Child Health and Human Development , Washington, DC.
37.
New Standards. (1999). Primary literacy standards for kindergarten through third grade. Washington, DC: National Center on Education and the Economy.
38.
O'Connor, R.E., & Jenkins, J.R. (1999). The prediction of reading disabilities in kindergarten and first grade. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 159—197.
39.
Puma, M.J., Darweit, N., Price, C., Ricciuti, A., Thompson, W., & Vaden-Kiernan, M. (1997). Prospects: Final report on student outcomes. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Planning and Evaluating Service.
40.
Rayner, K., Foorman, B., Perfetti, C.A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M.S. (2001). Psychological science can inform the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(2), 31—74.
41.
Scarborough, H.S. (1998). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities: Phonological awareness and some other promising predictors. In B. K. Shapiro, A. J. Capute, & B. Shapiro (Eds.), Specific reading disability: A view of the spectrum (pp. 77—121). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42.
Schatschneider, C., Francis, D.J., Foorman, B.F., Fletcher, J.M., & Mehta, P. (1999). The dimensionality of phonological awareness: An application of item response theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1—11.
43.
Shavelson, R.J., & Berliner, D.C. (1988). Evasion of the education research infrastructure: A reply to Finn. Educational Researcher , 17, 9—11.
44.
Slavin, R.E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
45.
Slavin, R.E., Madden, N.A., Dolan, L., & Wasik, B.A. (1996). Every child, every school: Success for all. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
46.
Snow, C.E., Burns, S.M., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading di ficulties in young children . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
47.
Taylor, B.M., Pearson, P.D., Clark, K., & Walpole, S. (2000). Effective schools and accomplished teachers: Lessons about primary-grade reading instruction in low-income schools. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 121—165.
Torgesen, J.K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 55—64.
51.
Torgesen, J.K. (2002). The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 7—26.
52.
Torgesen, J.K., Alexander, A.W., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Voeller, K., Conway, T., et al. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 34, 33—58.
53.
U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Twentieth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
54.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., & Lyon, G.R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ—achievement discrepancy definition for reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 223—238.
55.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
56.
Wasik, B.A., & Bond, M.A. (2001). Beyond the pages of a book: Interactive book reading and language development in preschool classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 243—250.
57.
Weber, G. (1971). Inner-city children can be taught to read: Four successful schools (CGE Occasional Paper No. 18). Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED057125)
58.
Wood, F., Hill, D., & Meyer, M. (2001). Predictive assessment of reading. Winston-Salem, NC: Author.
