This article describes a system of supports for implementing the Steps to Self-Determination curriculum and discusses findings from studies on the curriculum, all of which used a pre-post design with Steps as the intervention. Findings from outreach efforts to support implementation of Steps include teachers who are self-determined are better able to promote self-determination for their students, self-determination needs to be supported at all levels in the school organization, self-determination knowledge and skills can be infused successfully in a variety of subject areas, there are many ways to involve parents in self-determination instruction, support for positive relationships is central to self-determination, and achievement of valued goals is an important element of self-determination instruction. Practical strategies teachers have used to adapt or enhance the curriculum are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
Boyer, L. (1997). An examination of the effects of the Steps to Self-Determination curriculum on locus of control in youths with learning and behavioral disabilities. Unpublished master's thesis, Oakland University, Rochester, MI.
3.
Bruno, D.G. (2000). The effects of a self-determination intervention on youth explanatory style and depressive features. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
4.
Chadsey-Rusch, J., Rusch, F., & O'Reilly, M.F. (1991). Transition from school to integrated communities. Remedial and Special Education , 12, 23-33.
5.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
Field, S. (1996). Instructional strategies to promote self-determination for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 40-52.
7.
Field, S., & Hoffman, A. (1994). Development of a model for self-determination . Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 17, 159-169.
8.
Field, S., & Hoffman, A. (1996). Steps to self-determination. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
9.
Field, S., & Hoffman, A. (2000a). Steps to self-determination idea book. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University.
10.
Field, S., & Hoffman, A. (2000b). Teaching with integrity, reflection and self-determination . Unpublished manuscript.
11.
Field, S., Hoffman, A., St. Peter, S., & Sawilowsky, S. (1992). Skills and knowledge for self-determination: Interim research report. Detroit, MI : Wayne State University.
12.
Goldenberg, I., & Goldenberg, H. (2000). Family therapy: An overview . Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
13.
Halpern, A.S. (1994). The transition of youth with disabilities to adult life: A position statement of the Division on Career Development and Transition . Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 17, 115-124.
14.
Hoffman, A., & Field, S. (1995). Promoting self-determination through effective curriculum development. Intervention in School and Clinic , 30, 134-141.
15.
Hoffman, A., Field, S., & Sawilowsky, S. (1996a). Self-determination assessment battery. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University.
16.
Hoffman, A., Field, S., & Sawilowsky, S. (1996b). Self-determination knowledge scale. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
17.
Houchins, D.E. (1998). The self-determination of youth with and without disabilities who have been adjudicated. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of Florida, Gainesville .
18.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
19.
Johnson, D., Johnson, R., Holubec, E., & Ray, P. (1984). Circles of learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development .
20.
Kohn, A. (1993, September). Choices for children: Why and how to let students decide. Phi Delta Kappan,8-20.
21.
Kovacs, M. (1992). The children's depression inventory (CDI). Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 21, 995-1024.
22.
Martin, J.E., Huber-Marshall, L.H., & Maxson, L.M. (1993). Transition policy: Infusing self-determination and self-advocacy into transition programs. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 16, 53-61.
23.
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Perlmutter, L.C., & Monty, R.A. (1977). The importance of perceived control. Fact or fantasy?American Scientist, 65, 759-765.
26.
Realon, R.E., Favell, J.E., & Lowette, A., (1990). The effects of making choices on engagement levels with persons who are profoundly mentally handicapped. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 25, 248-254.
27.
Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1992, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq.
28.
Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq.
29.
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
30.
Schunk, D.H. (1985). Participation in goal setting: Effects on self-efficacy and skills on learning disabled children. The Journal of Special Education, 19, 307-316.
31.
Sitlington, P.L., Clark, G.M., & Kolstoe, O.P. (2000). Transition education and services for adolescents with disabilities. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
32.
Wang, M.C., & Stiles, B. (1976). An investigation of children's concept of self-responsibility for their learning. American Educational Research Journal , 13, 159-179.
33.
Ward, M.J., & Halloran, W.D. (1993). Transition issues for the 1990s. OSERS News in Print, 6, 4-5.
34.
Wehmeyer, M.L., (1992). Self-determination and the education of students with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27, 302-314.
35.
Wehmeyer, M., & Schwartz, M. (1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities . Exceptional Children, 63, 245-255.
