The purpose of this study was to investigate the extent of gender and race/ethnicity disproportionality among students identified as having learning disabilities (LD) and to investigate relationships between disproportionality and sociodemographic factors. Using nationally representative data collected by the U.S. Office for Civil Rights, this study examined the effects of gender, ethnicity, and sociodemographic factors on the proportion of students who are identified as having LD. Results indicated a clear association between ethnicity and gender and the odds of being identified as a student with LD. Sociodemographic factors for a school district were also found to be strongly associated with the proportion of students identified as having LD. A logistic regression model that included the nine sociodemographic variables, gender, and race, was significantly better at predicting LD identification than a model that included sociodemographic predictors alone. Adjusted odds ratios illustrated how the likelihood of identifying LD changes when sociodemographic influences are taken into account. Findings indicated that both individual student characteristics and district sociodemographic characteristics are important in determining the likelihood of LD identification and that the impact of the sociodemographic characteristics is different for each of the gender-ethnicity groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, M.G., & Webb-Johnson, G. (1995). Cultural contexts, the seriously emotionally disturbed classification, and African American learners . In B. A. Ford, F. E. Obiakor, & J. M. Patton (Eds.), Effective education of African American exceptional learners: New perspectives (pp. 151-187). Austin, TX : PRO-ED.
2.
Artiles, A.J., Aguirre-Munoz, Z., & Abedi, J. (1998). Predicting placement in learning disabilities programs: Do predictors vary by ethnicity group?Exceptional Children, 64, 543-559.
3.
Coutinho, M.J., & Oswald, D.P. (1998). Understanding identification, placement and school completion rates for children with disabilities: The influence of economic, demographic and educational variables. Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities,12, 43-78.
4.
Coutinho, M.J., & Oswald, D.P. (2000). Disproportionate representation in special education: A synthesis and recommendations. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 9, 135-156.
5.
Coutinho, M.J., Oswald, D.P., Best, A.L., & Forness S. (in press). Gender and socio-demographic factors and the disproportionate identification of minority students as emotionally disturbed. Behavioral Disorders.
6.
Draper, N.R., & Smith, H. (1998). Applied regression analyses. New York: Wiley.
7.
Dunn, L.M. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded—Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 23, 5-21.
8.
Epps, E.G. (2001). Race, class, social inequality, and special education: Summary comments. In C. A. Utley & F. E. Obiakor (Eds.), Special education, multicultural education, and school reform (pp. 228-237). Springfield, IL: Thomas.
9.
Fujiura, G.T., & Yamaki, K. (2000). Trends in demography of childhood poverty and disability. Exceptional Children, 66, 187-199.
10.
Garcia, S.B., & Malkin, D.H. (1993). Toward defining programs and services for culturally and linguistically diverse learners in special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 26, 52-58.
11.
Gregory, J.F., Shanahan, T., & Walberg, H. (1986). A profile of learning disabled twelfth-graders in regular classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 33-42.
12.
Harry, B. (1992). Cultural diversity, families, and the special education system: Communication for empowerment. New York : Teachers College Press.
13.
Harry, B., & Anderson, M.G. (1994). The disproportionate placement of African American males in special education programs: A critique of the process. Journal of Negro Education, 63, 602-619.
14.
Harry, B., Rueda, R., & Kalyanpur, M. (1999). Cultural reciprocity in socio-cultural perspective: Adapting the normalization principle for family collaboration. Exceptional Children, 66, 123-136.
15.
Heller, K.A., Holtzman, W.H., & Messick, S. (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Panel on selection and placement of students in programs for the mentally retarded. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16.
Hosmer, D.W., & Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley.
17.
18.
19.
Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (1995). What is LD? In K. A. Kavale and S. R. Forness, The nature of learning disabilities: Critical elements of diagnosis and classification (pp. 332-346). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
Lara, J. (1994). State data collection and monitoring procedures regarding overrepresentation of minority students in special education (U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Programs Contract No. HS92015001) . Washington, DC: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
21.
Larry P. v. Wilson Riles, 343 F. Supp. 1306 (N.D. Cal. 1972) (preliminary injunction). Aff'd 502 F. 2d963 (9th Cir. 1974 ); 495 F. Supp. 926 (N.D. Cal. 1979) (decision on merits). Aff'd (9th Cir., No. 80-427, 1984) (order modifying judgment, C-71-2270 RFP, 1986).
22.
Lester, G., & Kelman, M. (1997). State disparities in the diagnosis and placement of pupils with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 599-607.
23.
Messick, S. (1984). Placing children in special education: Findings of the National Academy of Sciences Panel. Educational Researcher , 14, 3-8.
24.
National Center for Educational Statistics. ( 1993). Common core of data [CCD93 CD-ROM]. Washington, DC: Author.
25.
Ortiz, A.A., & Maldonado-Colon, E. (1986). Recognizing learning disabilities in bilingual children: How to lessen inappropriate referrals of language minority students to special education. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International,2, 43-56.
26.
Ortiz, J., & Yates, J.R. (1983). Incidence of exceptionality among Hispanics: Implications for manpower training. NABE Journal, 7, 41-51.
27.
Oswald, D.P., & Coutinho, M.J. (2001). Trends in disproportionate representation: Implications for multicultural education. In C. A. Utley & F. E. Obiakor (Eds.), Special education, multicultural education, and school reform (pp. 53-73). Springfield, IL: Thomas.
28.
Oswald, D.P., Coutinho, M.J., Best, A.M., & Nguyen, N. (in press). The impact of socio-demographic characteristics on the identification rates of minority students as mentally retarded. Mental Retardation.
29.
Oswald, D.P., Coutinho, M.J., Best, A.M., & Singh, N.N. (1999). Ethnic representation in special education: The influence of school-related economic and demographic variables. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 194-206.
30.
Robertson, P., Kushner, M.I., Starks, J., & Drescher, C. (1994). An update of participation rates of culturally and linguistically diverse students in special education. The Bilingual Special Education Perspective, 14, 1-9.
31.
Trent, S.C., & Artiles, A.J. (1995). Serving culturally diverse students with emotional or behavioral disorders: Broadening current perspectives. In J. M. Kauffman, J. W. Lloyd, D. P. Hallahan, & T. A. Astuto (Eds.), Issues in educational placement: Students with emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 215-250). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32.
U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (1994). 1992 elementary and secondary school civil rights compliance report. Washington, DC: Author.
33.
U.S. Department of Education. (1996). Eighteenth annual report to Congress. Washington, DC: Author.
34.
U.S. Department of Education. (1998). Twentieth annual report to Congress. Washington, DC: Author.
35.
U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Twenty-second annual report to Congress. Washington, DC : Author.
36.
Utley, C.A., & Obiakor, F.E. (2001). Multicultural education and special education: Infusion for better schooling. In C. A. Utley & F. E. Obiakor (Eds.), Special education, multicultural education, and school reform (pp. 3-29). Springfield, IL: Thomas.
