The Individualized Education Program (IEP) has been the cornerstone of special education since the Education for All Handicapped Children Act became law in 1975. We begin this article by examining the relationship between the IEP and a free, appropriate public education. Then we discuss the IEP process and highlight the procedural changes and new requirements mandated by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997. Next, we present information from a number of due process hearings and cases that have involved IEPs to illustrate mistakes school districts often make that can result in rulings against a district. Finally, we provide guidelines to assist schools with developing legally correct and educationally appropriate IEPs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alberto, P.A., & Troutman, A.C. (1999). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (5th ed.). New York : Merrill.
2.
Alexander K. v. Virginia Bd. of Ed., 30 IDELR 967 (E.D. VA 1999). Allamakee School District, 24 IDELR 516 (SEA IA 1996).
3.
Ann Arbor Public Schools, 24 IDELR 621 (SEA MI 1996).
4.
Azle Independent School District, 26 IDELR 931 (SEA TX 1996).
5.
Baird, M.M. (1999). Legal issues in autism. Proceedings of the 20th National Institute on Legal Issues of Educating Individuals with Disabilities. Alexandria, VA: LRP.
6.
Bateman, B.D., & Linden, M.A. (1998). Better IEPs: How to develop legally correct and educationally useful programs (3rd ed). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
7.
Board of Educ. of the Hendrick Hudson School District v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982).
8.
Board of Educ. of the N. Rose-Wolcott Central School District, 26 IDELR 325 (SEA NY 1997).
9.
Board of Educ. of the Rosalyn Union Free School District, 31 IDELR 201 (SEA NY 1999).
10.
Clark County School District, 28 IDELR 804 (SEA NV 1998).
11.
Clark, S.G. (1999). Assessing IEPs for IDEA compliance. Education Law Reporter, 137, 35-42.
12.
Cobb County Schools, 24 IDELR 875 (SEA GA 1996).
13.
Columbia Regional Program and Portland School District, 24 IDELR 98 (SEA OR 1996).
14.
Delaware County IU #25 v. Martin K., 20 IDELR 363 (E.D. PA 1993).
15.
Deno, S.L. (1992). The nature and development of curriculum-measurement . Preventing School Failure, 36, 5-11.
16.
Dong v. Board of Educ. of the Rochester Community School District, 31 IDELR 157 (6th Cir. 1999).
17.
Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
18.
Eyer, T.L. (1998). Greater expectations: How the 1997 IDEA Amendments raise the basic floor of opportunity for children with disabilities. Education Law Report, 126, 1-19.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (1990). Making educational research more important. Exceptional Children, 57, 102-107.
21.
Gill v. Columbia 93 School District, 31 IDELR 29 (W.D. MO 1999).
22.
Gorn, D. (1999) What do I do when.... The answer book on special education law. Horsham, PA: LRP .
23.
High Bridge Board of Educ., 25 IDELR 589 (SEA NJ 1995).
24.
Horsnell, M., & Kitch, J. (1996). Bullet-proofing the IEP. Proceedings of the 15th National Institute on Legal Issues in Educating Individuals with Disabilities. Alexandria, VA: LRP.
25.
House of Representatives Report on P.L. 105-17 [Online]. (1997). URL: wais.access.gpo.gov
26.
Huefner, D.S. (2000). The risks and opportunities of the IEP requirements under IDEA 1997. Exceptional Children, 33, 195-204.
27.
In Re: Child with Disabilities, 23 IDELR 471 (SEA CT 1995).
28.
In Re: G., 27 IDELR 451 (DOD 1997).
29.
Independent School District #281, 28 IDELR 370 (SEA MN 1998).
30.
Independent School District #318, 24 IDELR 1096 (SEA MN 1996).
31.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
32.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Regulations of 1999, 34. C.F.R. § 300 et seq.
33.
LaMesa-Spring Valley School District, 30 IDELR 191 (SEA CA 1999).
34.
LaPoint, S.L. (1997). Student progress as a determinate of FAPE. In G. Reusch (Ed.), Special education law and practice (pp. 1-23). Horsham, PA: LRP .
35.
Lascari v. Ramapo-Indian Hills Regional School District, 560 A.2d 1180 (NJ Supreme Court, 1989).
36.
Lexington County School District #1, 29 IDELR 808 (LEA SC 1998).
37.
Lincoln Consolidated Schools, 25 IDELR MI (SEA 1996).
38.
Lipsky, D.K., & Gartner, A. (1996). Inclusive education and school restructuring. In W. Stainback & S. Stainback (Eds.), Controversial issues confronting special education: Divergent perspectives (pp. 3-15). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
39.
Long Beach Unified School District, 29 IDELR 541 (SEA CA 1998).
40.
Lovaas, O.I. (1981). Teaching developmentally disabled children: The ME book. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
41.
Lynch, E.C., & Beare, P.L. (1990). The quality of IEP objectives and the relevance to instruction for students with mental retardation and behavioral disorders . Remedial and Special Education, 11, 48-55.
42.
Martin, R. (1996). Litigation over the IEP. Proceedings of the 15th National Institute on Legal Issues in Educating Individuals with Disabilities. Alexandria, VA: LRP.
43.
Mr. X v. NY State DOE, 26 IDELR 854 (S.D. NY 1997).
44.
Norwood Public Schools, 28 IDELR 1282 (SEA MN 1998).
45.
Old Adobe Union School District, 27 IDELR 70 (SEA CA 1997).
46.
Peninsula School District, 27 IDELR 381 (SEA WA 1995).
47.
Pocatello School District #25, 18 IDELR 83 (SEA Idaho 1991).
48.
Rebecca S. v. Clarke School District, 22 IDELR 884 (M.D. GA 1996).
49.
Redlands School District, 28 IDELR 1256 (SEA CA 1998).
50.
Renner v. Board of Educ. of the Ann Arbor Public Schools, 30 IDELR 885 (6th Cir. 1999).
51.
San Diego Unified School District, 28 IDELR 244 (SEA CA 1998).
52.
Senate report on the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997. (1997). URL: wais.access.gpo.gov
53.
Shoreline School District, 26 IDELR 923 (SEA WA 1997).
54.
Smith, S.W. (1990a). Comparison of Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) of students with behavioral disorders and learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 24, 85-110.
55.
Smith, S.W. (1990b). Individualized education programs (IEPs) in special education—From intent to acquiescence. Exceptional Children , 57, 6-14.
56.
Smith, S.W., & Simpson, R.L. (1989). An analysis of individualized education programs (IEPs) for students with behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 14, 107-116.
57.
Taunton Public Schools, 27 IDELR 108 (SEA MA 1997).
58.
T. H. v. Board of Educ. of Palatine Community Consolidated School District, 30 IDELR 764 (N.D. IL 1999).
59.
Tucker, B.P., & Goldstein, B.A. (1992). Legal rights of persons with disabilities: An analysis of public law. Horsham, PA: LRP.
60.
Yell, M.L. (1998). The law and special education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/ Prentice Hall.
61.
Yell, M.L., & Drasgow, E. (1999). A legal analysis of inclusion. Preventing School Failure, 43, 118-123.
62.
Yell, M.L., & Drasgow, E. (2000). Litigating a free appropriate public education: The Lovaas hearings and cases. The Journal of Special Education , 33, 205-214.
