November 29, 2000, marked the 25th anniversary of the signing into law of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). This seminal law has improved the educational opportunities for students with disabilities in the United States. In this article we briefly review the IDEA's first 25 years and speculate on the direction the IDEA may take in the future. Our purpose in this article is to (a) present the litigative and legislative developments that led to the passage of IDEA, (b) examine the law itself and the litigation interpreting the IDEA, and (c) discuss the direction that IDEA may take over the next 25 years.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.
2.
Armstrong v. Kline, 476 F. Supp. 583 (E.D. Pa. 1979).
Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982).
5.
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
6.
Burlington School Committee v. Department of Education of Massachusetts, 471 U.S. 359 (1985).
7.
Carl Perkins Vocational Education Act of 1984, 20 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq.
8.
Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garrett F., 119 S. Ct. 992 (1999).
9.
Clark, S.G. (1999). Assessing IEPs for IDEA compliance. Education Law Report, 137, 35-42.
10.
Daniel R. R. v. State Board of Education , 874 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir. 1989).
11.
Developmentally Disabled Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 1974, 42 U.S.C. § 6000 et seq.
12.
Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
13.
Education of the Handicapped Act of 1970, Pub. L. No. 91-230, 84 Stat. 175, Part B.
14.
Education of the Handicapped Act Amendments of 1986, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
15.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Pub. L. No. 89-10, 79 Stat. 27.
16.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act Amendments of 1966, Pub. L. No. 89-750, § 161, 80 Stat. 328.
17.
Eyer, T.L. (1998). Greater expectations: How the 1997 IDEA Amendments raise the basic floor of opportunity for children with disabilities. Education Law Report, 126, 1-19.
18.
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, 20 U.S.C. § 1232 et seq.
19.
Florence County School District Four v. Carter, 114 S. Ct. 361 ( 1993).
20.
Gorn, S. (1997). What do I do when: The answer book on individualized education programs. Horsham, PA: LRP.
21.
Handicapped Children's Protection Act of 1986, 20 U.S.C. § 1415.
22.
Hartmann v. Loudoun County Board of Education , 26 IDELR 167 (4th Cir. 1997).
23.
Honig v. Doe, 108 S. Ct. 592 (1988).
24.
Huefner, D.S. (2000). Getting comfortable with special education law: A framework for working with children with disabilities. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon .
25.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
26.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
27.
The Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities Act of 1986, 20 U.S.C. § 1471-1485.
28.
Irving Independent School District v. Tatro, 468 U.S. 883 (1984).
29.
K. R. v. Anderson Community Corporation, 81 F.3d 673 (7th Cir. 1966).
30.
Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia, 348 F. Supp. 866 (D.D.C. 1972).
31.
Office of Special Education Programs. (2000 ). IDEA 25th anniversary [Online]. URL: www.ed.gov/offices/OSERS/IDEA25th.html
32.
Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Citizens (PARC) v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 343 F. Supp. 279 (E.D. Pa. 1972).
33.
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, § 504, 29 U.S.C. § 794.
34.
S-1 v. Turlington, 635 F.2d 342 (5th Cir. 1981).
35.
Spielberg v. Henrico County Public Schools , 853 F. 2d 256 (4th Cir. 1988).
36.
Timonthy W. v. Rochester (NH) School District, 875 F.2d 954 (1st Cir. 1989).
37.
Turnbull, H.R., & Turnbull, A.P. (2000). Free appropriate public education: The law and children with disabilities (6th ed.). Denver, CO: Love.
38.
U.S. Department of Education. (2000a). Education department celebrates IDEA 25th anniversary; progress continues for students with disabilities [Online]: URL: www.ed.gov/PressReleases/11-2000/112900.html
39.
U.S. Department of Education. (2000b). Twenty-second annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author
40.
Winzer, M.A. (1993). History of special education from isolation to integration. Washington, DC: Gallaudet Press.
41.
Yell, M.L. (1998). The law and special education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall/ Merrill.
42.
Yell, M.L., & Drasgow, E. (2000). Litigating a free appropriate public education: The Lovaas hearings and cases. The Journal of Special Education , 33, 206-215.
43.
Zettel, J.J., & Ballard, J. (1982). The Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 (P.L. 94-142): Its history, origins, and concepts. In J. Ballard, B. Ramirez, and F. Weintraub (Eds.), Special education in America: Its legal and governmental foundations (pp. 11-22). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
44.
Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District, 113 S. Ct. 2462 (1993).
