The purpose of the present study was to investigate student preferences for specific adaptations in general education classroom testing. Participants in the study were 158 middle school students, including students with high-incidence disabilities (HID) and general education students with low, average, high, and very high achievement. Students completed an instrument developed for the study, the Student Preferences for Testing Adaptations Questionnaire. Students rated each of 23 specific testing adaptations on a 4-point scale (1 = dislike to 4 = high preference). In two additional questions, students also stated reasons for a single most-liked and a single least-liked adaptation.
Most testing adaptations were at least moderately preferred by students. Open-notes and open-book tests were among the adaptations most preferred, and least-preferred adaptations included teacher reading of test questions to students and tests with fewer questions or covering less material. Students with HID and/or students with low achievement indicated significantly higher preference than did students with average or above-average achievement for several adaptations. Students' rationales for their choices of most-liked adaptations included improved test performance as well as the opportunity to work with peers and to receive assistance. On the other hand, students' descriptions of least-liked adaptations included concerns regarding fairness and interference with their own style of working.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, L. (1997, November). Inclusion of students with disabilities and standards and assessments: Emerging policies and recommendations from the Colorado Department of Education. Paper presented at the Council for Learning Disabilities Conference, Arlington, VA.
2.
Bender, W.N., Vail, C.O., & Scott, K. (1995). Teachers' attitudes toward increased mainstreaming: Implementing effective instruction for students with learning disabilities . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 87-94.
3.
Chalmers, L. (1991). Classroom modifications for the mainstreamed student with high-incidence handicaps. Intervention in School and Clinic, 27, 40-42, 51.
Cooper, H., & Nye, B. (1994). Homework for students with learning disabilities: The implications of research for policy and practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 470-479.
6.
Ellett, L. (1993). Instructional practices in mainstreamed secondary classrooms. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 57-64.
7.
Friend, M., & Bursuck, W.D. (1996). Including students with special needs: A practical guide for classroom teachers. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
8.
Gajria, M., Salend, S.J., & Hemrick, M.A. (1994). Teacher acceptability of testing modifications for mainstreamed students. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 236-243.
9.
Gersten, R., & Woodward, J. (1990). Rethinking the Regular Education Initiative: Focus on the classroom teacher. Remedial and Special Education, 11(3) 7-16.
10.
Hall, R.P., Knudsen, J., & Greeno, J.G. (1996). A case study of systemic aspects of assessment technologies. Educational Assessment, 3, 315-361.
11.
Hoover, H.D., Hieronymus, A.N., Frisbie, D.A., & Dunbar, S.B. (1993). Iowa Test of Basic Skills (Forms K and L). Chicago: The Riverside Publishing Company .
12.
Jayanthi, M., Bursuck, W., Epstein, M., & Cumblad, C. (1992). [School reform: Impact of classroom testing on students with disabilities and their families]. Unpublished raw data.
13.
Jayanthi, M., Epstein, M.H., Polloway, E.A., & Bursuck, W.D. (1996). A national survey of general education teachers' perceptions of testing adaptations. The Journal of Special Education, 30, 99-115.
14.
Kazdin, A.E. (1980). Research design in clinical psychology. New York: Harper & Row.
15.
Kazdin, A.E. (1981). Acceptability of child treatment techniques: The influence of treatment efficacy and adverse side effects. Behavior Therapy, 12, 493-506.
16.
Keogh, B.K. (1988). Improving services for problem learners: Rethinking and restructuring. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 12-22.
17.
Madden, N., & Slavin, R. (1983). Mainstreaming students with high-incidence handicaps: Academic and social outcomes. Review of Educational Research , 53, 519-569.
18.
McLeskey, J., & Waldron, N.L. (1991). Identifying students with learning disabilities: The effect of implementing statewide guidelines. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 501-506.
19.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Norusis, M.J. (1986). The SPSS guide to data analysis. Chicago: SPSS. Pace-Chappell, E. (1985, April). Mainstreamed secondary students and course proficiency testing without modifications. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Council for Exceptional Children, Anaheim, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 257 296)
21.
Patton, J.R. (1994). Practical recommendations for using homework with students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 27, 470-478.
22.
Polloway, E.A., Bursuck, W.D., Jayanthi, M., Epstein, M.H., & Nelson, J.S. (1996). Treatment acceptability: Determining appropriate interventions within inclusive classrooms. Intervention in School and Clinic, 31, 133-144.
23.
Post, L.M. (1984). Individualizing instruction in the middle school: Modifications and adaptations in curriculum for the mainstreamed student. Clearing House, 58, 73-76.
24.
Putnam, M.L. (1992). The testing practices of mainstream secondary classroom teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 13(5), 11-21.
25.
Reimers, T.M., Wacker, D.P., & Koeppl, G. (1987). Acceptability of behavioral interventions: A review of the literature. School Psychology Review, 16, 212-227.
26.
Reisberg, L. (1990). Curriculum evaluation and modification: An effective teaching perspective. Intervention in School and Clinic, 26, 99-105.
27.
National Association of School Boards of Education Study Group on Special Education. (1992). Winners all: A call for inclusive schools. Alexandria, VA: Author.
28.
Schumm, J.S., Vaughn, S., & Saumell, L. (1992). What teachers do when the textbook is tough: Students speak out. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 481-503.
29.
Seidel, J.V. (1988). The ethnograph [Computer software]. Amherst, MA: Qualis Research Associates.
30.
Siegel, S., & Castellan, N.J. , Jr. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
31.
Simons, G.H., & Hepner, N. (1992). The special student in science. Science Scope, 16(1), 34-39.
32.
Swanson, S., & Howell, C. (1996). Test anxiety in adolescents with learning disabilities and behavior disorders. Exceptional Children, 62, 389-397.
33.
U. S. Department of Education. (1990). Twelfth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Act. Washington, DC: Author.
34.
U. S. Department of Education. (1998). Twentieth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Act. Washington, DC: Author.
35.
Vaughn, S., Schumm, J.S., & Kouzekanani, K. (1993). What do students with learning disabilities think when their general education teachers make adaptations?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 545-555.
36.
Vaughn, S., Schumm, J.S., Niarhos, F.J., & Daugherty, T. (1993). What do students think when teachers make adaptations?Teaching and Teacher Education, 9, 107-118.
37.
Vaughn, S., Schumm, J.S., Niarhos, F.J., & Gordon, J. (1993). Students' perceptions of two hypothetical teachers' instructional adaptations for low achievers. Elementary School Journal, 94, 87-102.
38.
Vaughn, S., Schumm, J.S., Saumell, L., & Klingner, J. (1998). Students' views of instructional practices: Implications for inclusion. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21, 57-74.
39.
Will, M.C. (1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 411-415.
40.
Witt, J.C., & Elliot, S.N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom management strategies . In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 251-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41.
Wood, J.W., Miederhoff, J.W., & Ulschmid, B. (1989). Adapting test construction for mainstreamed social studies students. Social Education, 53, 46-48.
42.
Zigmond, N., Levin, E., & Laurie, T.E. (1985). Managing the mainstream: An analysis of teacher attitudes and student performance in mainstream high school programs. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 535-541.
