The central purpose of this study was to show how the personal and organizational interests of adult educators are causally related to the planning of educational programs. A qualitative multi-case study was conducted of six county extension agents and four district program development specialists in the Cooperative Extension System. The study shows how traditionalist interests are embedded in the contextual factors that affect the planning practices of county agents and the ways in which these factors affected the seven programs planned by these agents. Specifically, three categories of structural factors were found to constrain or enable county agents' planning practices: a) organizational structure and culture, b) available resources, and c) power relationships. These factors affected the programs that county agents constructed through their planning practices in terms of the needs addressed and the planning process employed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beal, G. M.
, Blount, R. C., Powers, R. C., & Johnson, W. J. (1966). Social action and interaction in program planning.Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
2.
Boone, E. J.
(1985). Developing programs in adult education.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3.
Boyle, P. G.
(1981). Planning better programs.New York: McGraw-Hill.
4.
Brookfield, S. F.
(1986). Understanding and facilitating adult learning.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Casey, M. A. (1989). Program planning processes used by Minnesota Extension Service agriculture agents (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota). Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 2748A.
6.
Cervero, R. M.
, & Wilson, A. L. (1994a). Planning responsibly for adult education: A guide to negotiating power and interests.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Cervero, R. M.
, & Wilson, A. L. (1994b). The politics of responsibility: A theory of program planning practice for adult education. Adult Education Quarterly, 45, 249-268.
8.
Copa, P.
(1986). Exploring essential elements of successful practice.Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Department of Continuing and Vocational Education.
9.
Forest, L. B.
(1989). The cooperative extension service. In S. B. Merriam & P. M. Cunningham (Eds.), Handbook of adult and continuing education (pp. 332-343). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Forest, L. B.
, & Baker, H. R. (1994). The program planning process. In D. J. Blackburn (Ed.), Extension handbook: Processes and practices (2nd ed.) (pp. 86-99). Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishing.
11.
Forester, J.
(1989). Planning in the face of power.Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
Forester, J.
(1993). Critical theory, public policy, and planning practice.Albany: State University of New York Press.
13.
Futures Task Force Report to the Extension Committee on Organization and Policy.
(1987). Extension in transition: Bridging the gap between vision and reality.Petersburg, VA: Virginia State University Cooperative Extension Service.
14.
Goetz, J. P.
, & LeCompte, M. D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research.Orlando: Academic Press.
15.
Griffin, C.
(1983). Curriculum theory in adult and lifelong education.London: Croom Helm.
16.
Johnsrud, M. D.
, & Fowler, R. E. (1991). Patterns of change.A report of the Cooperative Extension System Strategic Planning Council.Washington, DC: Extension Service, USDA.
17.
McDowell, G. R.
(1991, April). The USDA and the extension system revisited or if you haven 't visited extension recently, you better do it soon, cause it isn't going to be there long. Paper presented to the National Invitational Workshop, Nashville, TN.
18.
Merriam, S. B.
(1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
Mills, D. E. (1993). Program planning practice in the Georgia Extension Service: A critical perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
20.
Patton, M. Q.
(1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
Pennington, F.
, & Green, J. (1976). Comparative analysis of program development processes in six professions.Adult Education, 27, 13-23.
22.
Sanders, H. C.
(Ed.). (1966). The Cooperative Extension Service.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23.
Sandmann, L. R.
(1993). Why programs aren't implemented as planned.Journal of Extension, 31 (Winter), 18-21.
24.
Walker, D. F.
(1971). A naturalistic model of curriculum development.School Review, 80, 51-65.
25.
Warner, P. D.
, & Christenson, J. A. (1984). The Cooperative Extension Service: A national assessment.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
26.
Wissemann, A. F. (1991). Processes used by selected Illinois extension agents (advisers) to provide high quality programs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
27.
Yin, R. K.
(1984). Case study research: Design and methods.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
