This qualitative comparative case study was guided by a feminist-materialist theoretical framework, and examined how power relationships predominantly based on gender but including race, class, and age were manifested in higher education classrooms of adult students. Two master's level counseling classes were chosen for the study, one was taught by a male professor and the other by a femal professor. The predominant means of data collection were audiotaped participant-observations of the classes; interviews and document analysis were additional sources of data. Data were analyzed according to the constant comparative method. Major findings of the study are: (a) students who benefit from interlockng systems of privilege have more power in the classroom; (b) the male professor tended to exert more control than the female professor; and (c) middle-aged women with more education tend to be more participatory, at least in classes where affective forms of knowledge are valued.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, G.
(1989). Critical ethnography in education: Origins, current status and new directions. Review of Educational Research, 59(3), 249-170.
2.
Apple, M.
(1986). Teachers as texts.New York: Routledge.
3.
Apple, M.
, & Beyer, L (1988). Social evaluation and curriculum. In L. Beyer & M. Apple (Eds.), The curriculum: Problems, politics, and possibilities (pp. 334-350). Albany: SUNY.
4.
Beer, C.
, & Darkenwald, G. (1989). Gender differences in adult student perceptions of college classroom social environments. Adult Education Quarterly, 40, 33-42.
5.
Belenky, M.
, Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., & Tarule, J. (1986). Women's ways of knowing.New York: Basic Books.
6.
Beyer, L.
, & Apple, M. (1988). Values and politics in the curriculum. In L. Beyer & M. Apple (Eds.), The curriculum: Problems politics, and possibilities (pp. 10-17). Albany: SUNY.
7.
Boyer, E.
(1987). College.New York: Harper & Row.
8.
Bogdan, R,
& Biklen S. (1982). Qualitative research for education.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
9.
Chafetz, J.
(1988). Feminist sociology: An overview of contemporary theories.Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
10.
Colin, S.
, & Preciphs, T. K (1991). Perceptual patterns and the learning environment: Confronting white racism. In R Hiemstra (Ed.), Creating environments for effective adult learning (pp. 61-70). New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, No. 50. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Collard S.
, & Law, M. (1989). The limits of perspective transformation: A critique of Mezirow's theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 61, 75-91.
12.
Collard, S.
, & Stalker, J. (1991). Women's trouble: Women, gender and the learning environment. In R Hiemstra (Ed.), Creating environments for effective adult learning (pp. 71-82). New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, No. 50. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
Collins, P. H.
(1991). Black feminist thought.London: Routledge, Chapman and Hall.
14.
Connell, R.
(1985). Teachers' work.London: George Allen and Unwin.
15.
Cunningham, P.
(1988). The adult educator and social responsibility. In R Brocket (Ed.), Ethical issues in adult education (pp. 133-145). New York: Teachers College Press.
16.
Cunningham, P.
(1992). From Freire to feminism: The North American experience with critical pedagogy. Adult Education Quarterly, 42, 180-191.
17.
Davis, L.
(1983). Gender, resistance and power. In S. Walker and L Barton (Eds.), Gender, class, and education.Lewes, Sussex: Falmer.
18.
Deem, R.
(1978). Women and schooling.Boston: Routledge.
19.
Ellsworth, E.
(1989). Why doesn't this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297-323.
20.
Fonow, M.
, & Cook, J. (1991). Back to the future: A look at the second wave of feminist epistemology and methodology. In M. Fonow & J. Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology (pp. 1-15). Bloomington: Indiana University.
21.
Freire, P.
(1971). Pedagogy of the oppressed.New York: Herder & Herder.
22.
Gabriel, S.
, & Smithson, I. (Eds.). (1990). Gender in thie classroom: Power and pedagogy.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
23.
Gardner, S.
, Dean C., & McKaig, D. (1989). Responding to differences in the classroom: The politics of knowledge, class, and sexuality. Sociology of Education, 62 (January), 64-74.
24.
Glaser, B.
, & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory.New York: Aldine.
25.
Goetz, J.
, & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethinography and qualitative design.Orlando: Academic Press.
26.
Gramsci, A.
(1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonia Gramsci. [Q. Hoare & G. Nowell-Smith Trans, (Eds.)] New York: Lawrence & Wishart.
27.
Hall, R.
& Sandler, B. (1982). The classroom climate: A chilly one for women.Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges Project on the Status of Women in Education.
28.
Hart, M.
(1985). Thematization of power, the search for common interests, and self reflection: Towards a comprehensive concept of emancipatory education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 4, 119-134.
29.
Hart, M.
(1990). Liberation through consciousness raising. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning (pp. 47-73). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
30.
Hart, M
(1992). Working and educating for life: Feminist and international perspectives on adult education.New York: Routledge.
31.
Hayes, E.
(1989). Insights from women's experience for teaching and learning. In E. Hayes (Ed.), Effective teaching styles (pp. 55-65). New Directions for Continuing Education, No. 43. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32.
Hayes, E.
(1990, April). Perceptions of adult men and women students in higher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
33.
hooks, b.
(1989). Talking back Thinking feminist, thinking black.Boston: South End Press.
34.
Hugo, J.
(1989, February). Adult education and feminist theory. In P. Cunningham & J. Ohliger (Eds.), Radical thinking in adult education. Occasional paper No. 1 (pp. 16-36). Battle Creek, MI: Kellogg Foundation.
35.
Kelly, G.
, & Nihien, A. (1982). Schooling and the reproduction of patriarchy: Unequal workloads, unequal rewards. In M. Apple (Ed.), Cultural and economic reproduction in education (pp. 162-180) Boston: Routledge.
36.
Lather, P.
(1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
37.
Lewis, M.
(1990). Interrupting patriarchy. Politics, resistance and transformation in the feminist classroom. Harvard Educational Review,60(4), 467-488.
38.
Lewis, M.
, & Simon, R (1986). A discourse not intended for her: Learning and teaching within patriarchy. Harvard Educational Review, 56(4), 457-471.
39.
Lincoln, Y.
, & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40.
Maher, F. A.
(1987). Toward a richer theory of feminist pedagogy: A comparison of "liberation" and "gender" models for teaching and learning. Journal of Education, 169(3), 91-100.
41.
McRobbie, A.
(1978). Working class girls in the culture of femininity. In Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (Eds.), Women take issue. (pp. 96-108). London: Hutchinson.
42.
Merriam, S.
(1988). Case study research in education.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43.
Ogbu, J.
(1982). Minority education and caste: The American system in cross-cultural perspective.New York: Academic Press.
44.
Roehl, J.
, & Strickler, S. (1991, April). Gender distinctions in the adult education classroom. Paper presented at the National University Continuing Education Association National Conference, Miami, FL.
45.
Roman, L.
, & Apple, M. (1990). Is naturalism a move away from positivism? Materialist and feminist approaches to subjectivity in ethnographic research. In E. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education (pp. 38-73). New York: Teachers College Press.
46.
Rubin, S.
, & Roesslear, R. (1987). Foundations of the vocational rehabilitation process. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
47.
Spradley, J.
(1980). Participant observation.Chicago: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
48.
Statham, A.
, Richardson, L., & Cook, 3. (1991). Gender and university teaching.Albany: State University of New York Press.
49.
Tisdell, E.
(1993). Feminism and adult learning: Power, pedagogy, and praxis. In S. B. Merriam (Ed.), An update on adult learning (pp. 91-103). New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, No. 57. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
50.
Treichler P.
, & Kramarae, C. (1983). Women's talk in the ivory tower. Communication Quarterly,31(2), 118-132.
51.
Weiler, K
(1988). Women teaching for change.South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey Publishers.
52.
Weiler, K.
(1991). Freire and a feminist pedagogy of difference.Harvard Educational Review, 61(4), 449-474.
53.
Wood, G.
(1988). Democracy and the curriculum. In L. Beyer & M.Apple (Eds.), The curriculum: Problems, politics, and possibilities (pp. 166-187). AlbanySUNY.
