Provided in this exploratory study is a description of how one group of adult learners describe how they determine the quality of their work-related, self-directed learning activities. Data were collected from training and development professionals by means of focus groups and analyzed using the constant comparative method of data analysis. Five themes that emerged from the data are outlined, followed by a discussion of the issues and implications for research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BergerN. O. (1990). A qualitative study of the process of self-directed learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
2.
BogdanR. C.BiklenS. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods.Boston: Allyn & Bacon
3.
BrockettR. G.HiemstraR. (in press). Self-direction in adult learning: From theory to practice.London: Routledge
BrookfieldS. (1988). Ambiguities in self-directed learning. In LongH. B. & Associates, (Ed.) Self-directed learning: Application and theory (pp. 11–37). Athens, Georgia: Department of Adult Education, University of Georgia
6.
BrundageD.MacKeracherD. (1980). Adult learning principles and their application to program planning.Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education
7.
CaffarellaR. S. (1988). Program development and evaluation resource book for trainers.New York: John Wiley
8.
CaffarellaR. S.O'DonnellJ. M. (1987). Self-directed adult learning: A critical paradigm revisited.Adult Education Quarterly, 37, 199–211
9.
CaffarellaR. S.O'DonnellJ. M. (1988). Research in self-directed learning: Past, present and future trends. In LongH. B. & Associates, (Ed.) Self-directed learning: Application and theory (pp. 65–97). Athens, GA: Department of Adult Education, University of Georgia
10.
CaffarellaR. S.O'DonnellJ. M. (1989). Self-directed learning.Nottingham, England: Department of Adult Education, University of Nottingham
11.
CandyP. C. (1988). Reframing research into “self-direction” in adult education: A constructivist perspective. (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 1033A.
12.
ChoiS. (1981). Empirical validation of the instructional quality profile as an analytical curriculum evaluation and design tool. (Doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University).Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 521A
13.
CoolicanP. M. (1974). Self-planned learning: Implications for the future of adult education. Technical Report No. 74–307. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 095 254)
14.
DanisC.TremblayN. A. (1988). Autodidactic learning experiences: Questioning established adult learning principles. In LongH. B. & Associates, (Ed.) Self-directed learning: Application and theory (pp. 171–197). Athens, Georgia: Department of Adult Education, University of Georgia
15.
ForestA.KnappJ. E.PendergrassJ. (1976). Tools and methods of evaluation. In KeetonM. T. & Associates, (Eds.), Experiential learning: Rationale, characteristics, & assessment (pp. 161–178). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
16.
FreedmanL. (1987). Quality in continuing education.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
17.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.Chicago: Aldine
18.
GoldmanA. E. (1962). The group depth interview.Journal of Marketing, 26(3), 61–68
19.
HassanA. M. (1982). An investigation of the learning projects among adults of high and low readiness for self-direction in learning. (Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University).Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 3838A–3839A
20.
HessJ. M. (1968). Group interviewing. In KingR. L., (Ed.), 1968 Fall Conference Proceedings, (pp. 193–196). Chicago: American Marketing Association
21.
JaegerR. (1984). Sampling in education and the social sciences.New York: Longman
22.
KirkpatrickD. L. (1987). Evaluation. In CraigR. L., (Ed.), Training and development handbook (3rd ed.) (pp. 301–319). New York: McGraw Hill
23.
KirkwoodR. (1976). Importance of assessing learning. In KeetonM. T. & Associates, (Eds.), Experiential learning: Rationale, characteristics, & assessment (pp. 150–160). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
24.
KnowlesM. S. (1980). Modern practice of adult education (Revised edition). Chicago: Association Press
25.
MerriamS. B.CaffarellaR. S. (1991). Learning in adulthood.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
26.
MockerD.SpearG. (1982). Lifelong learning: Formal, informal, and self-directed learning.Kansas City: Center for Resource Development Education, University of Missouri-Kansas City. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 220 723)
27.
O'DonnellJ. M. (1988). Focus groups: A habit-forming evaluation technique.Training & Development Journal, 42, 71–73
28.
PattonM. Q. (1980). Qualitative research methods.Beverly Hills, California: Sage Press
29.
PavesicD. V. (1981). Perceptions of academic administrators in the state university system of Florida on the importance of selected components of quality in higher education. (Doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University).Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 4328A
30.
RoseA. D. (1989). Nontraditional education and the assessment of prior learning. In MerriamS. B.CunninghamP. M., (Eds.), Handbook of adult and continuing education (pp. 211–220). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
31.
SabbaghianZ. S. (1980). Adult self-directedness and self-concept: An exploration of relationships (Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, 1979).Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 3701A
32.
ShaverJ. D. (1978). An examination of the quality of effort that college and university students invest in their own learning and development (Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles, 1978).Dissertation Abstracts International, 39 5362A
33.
SorkT. J.CaffarellaR. S. (1989). Planning programs for adults. In MerriamS. B.CunninghamP. M., (Eds.), Handbook of adult education (pp. 233–245). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
34.
SpearD. (1988). Beyond the organizing circumstance: A search for methodology for the study of self-directed learning. In LongH. B., & Associates, (Eds.), Self-directed learning: Application and theory (pp. 199–221). Athens, Georgia: Department of Adult Education, University of Georgia
35.
SpearG. E.MockerD. W. (1984). The organizing circumstance: Environmental determinants in self-directed learning.Adult Education Quarterly, 35, 1–10
36.
StufflebeamD. (1975). Evaluation as a community education process.Community Education Journal, 2, 7–12
37.
TullD. S.HawkinsD. I. (1984). Marketing research: Measurement and methods (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan
38.
WillinghamW. W. (1976). Critical issues and basic requirements for assessment. In KeetonM. T. & Associates, (Eds.), Experiential learning: Rationale, characteristics, & assessment (pp. 224–244). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
39.
ZemkeR.KramlingerT. (1982). Figuring things out: A trainer's guide to needs and task analysis.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
