Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-8
Understanding the Practical Constraints of Teaching in the Correctional Environment: An Exploration of Course Credits,Degree Pathways,and Instructor Compensation
The limited research on instructors who provide higher education in the correctional environment highlights the complexities of navigating the tensions and restrictions that exist at the intersection of providing quality higher education in the correctional environment. In response to the call to explore how scholars, educators, and activists navigate teaching, including the challenges at the intersection of equity, justice, and education on the ground, the current study considers how instructors navigate the practical constraints associated with teaching in the correctional environment. Through a qualitative investigation of instructor experiences teaching inside correctional facilities across the United States (n = 41), findings support prior research by emphasizing the complexities associated with adapting to and navigating correctional policies related to the provision of credits, degrees, and compensation similar to traditional on-campus course offerings.
ApplebyA. M. (2023a). A multi-method approach to understanding higher education in the non-traditional classroom: Navigating the institutional norms at the intersection of higher education and corrections [Doctoral dissertation]. Rutgers University-Graduate School-Newark.
3.
ApplebyA. M. (2023b). Pedagogy, course design, and student engagement: Instructor preparations for teaching in the correctional environment. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2023.2253128
4.
BakerT. L.VelezW. (1996). Access to and opportunity in postsecondary education in the United States: A review. Sociology of Education, 69, 82–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/3108457
5.
BodinR.OrangeS. (2018). Access and retention in French higher education: Student drop-out as a form of regulation. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39(1), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2017.1319760
CaruthG. D. (2018). Student engagement, retention, and motivation: Assessing academic success in today’s college students. Participatory Educational Research, 5(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.18.4.5.1
8.
CastroE. L.BrawnM. (2017). Critiquing critical pedagogies inside the prison classroom: A dialogue between student and teacher. Harvard Educational Review, 87(1), 99–121.
9.
CastroE. L.RoyerC. E.GouldM. R.LermanA. E. (2022). Beyond Pell restoration: Addressing persistent funding challenges in higher education in prison toward racial and economic justice. Alliance for Higher Education in Prison. https://www.higheredinprison.org/publications/beyond-pell-restoration
ConwayP. F. (2022). Andragogy in prison: Higher education in prison and the tenets of adult education. Adult Education Quarterly, 72(4), 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136221100481
12.
ConwayP. F. (2023). ‘Education changes a person’: exploring student development in a college-in-prison program through critical andragogy. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–17.
13.
DeterdingN. M.WatersM. C. (2021). Flexible coding of in-depth interviews: A twenty-first-century approach. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(2), 708–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799377
LockeK.FeldmanM.Golden-BiddleK. (2022). Coding practices and iterativity: Beyond templates for analyzing qualitative data. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 262–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120948600
17.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013005020
OlaghereA.KremerK. P.FongC. J. (2021). Learning opportunities while incarcerated: Association of engagement in literacy and numeracy activities with literacy and numeracy skills. Adult Education Quarterly, 71(3), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713620988505
20.
PerrucciR.PerrucciC. C. (2014, March). The good society: Core social values, social norms, and public policy. Sociological Forum, 29(1), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12078
21.
RamdehollD.GnanadassE.MerriweatherL.St. ClairR. (2023). Adult education as a human right/adult education for human rights. Adult Education Quarterly, 73(4), 343–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136231198375
22.
RidgewayC. L.FiskS. R. (2012). Class rules, status dynamics, and “gateway” interactions. In FiskeS. T.MarkusH. R. (Eds.), Facing social class: How societal rank influences interaction (pp. 131–151). Russell Sage Foundation.
WalshB.DelaneyR. (2020). First class: Starting a postsecondary education. (3), 366–389. Program in prison. Vera Institute of Justice. https://www.vera.org/downloads/publications/first-class-post-secondary-education-in-prison.pdf
29.
WarnerK. (2007). Against the narrowing of perspectives: How do we see learning, prisons and prisoners?. Journal of Correctional Education, 58(2), 170–183.
30.
WeaverA.RousseauD.NapiorA. J. (2020). Learning from teachers. Journal of Correctional Education, 71(1), 18–56.
