Understanding the Practical Constraints of Teaching in the Correctional Environment: An Exploration of Course Credits,Degree Pathways,and Instructor Compensation

Abstract

The limited research on instructors who provide higher education in the correctional environment highlights the complexities of navigating the tensions and restrictions that exist at the intersection of providing quality higher education in the correctional environment. In response to the call to explore how scholars, educators, and activists navigate teaching, including the challenges at the intersection of equity, justice, and education on the ground, the current study considers how instructors navigate the practical constraints associated with teaching in the correctional environment. Through a qualitative investigation of instructor experiences teaching inside correctional facilities across the United States (n = 41), findings support prior research by emphasizing the complexities associated with adapting to and navigating correctional policies related to the provision of credits, degrees, and compensation similar to traditional on-campus course offerings.

Keywords

higher education corrections pedagogy higher education in prison

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alliance for Higher Education in Prison (2021). National directory of higher education in prison programs. https://www.higheredinprison.org/national-directory

Appleby

A. M.

(2023a). A multi-method approach to understanding higher education in the non-traditional classroom: Navigating the institutional norms at the intersection of higher education and corrections [Doctoral dissertation]. Rutgers University-Graduate School-Newark.

Appleby

A. M.

(2023b). Pedagogy, course design, and student engagement: Instructor preparations for teaching in the correctional environment. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2023.2253128

Baker

T. L.

Velez

(1996). Access to and opportunity in postsecondary education in the United States: A review. Sociology of Education, 69, 82–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/3108457

Bodin

Orange

(2018). Access and retention in French higher education: Student drop-out as a form of regulation. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39(1), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2017.1319760

Bureau of Prisons (2023). About our agency: Mission. https://www.bop.gov/about/agency/agency_pillars.jsp

Caruth

G. D.

(2018). Student engagement, retention, and motivation: Assessing academic success in today’s college students. Participatory Educational Research, 5(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.18.4.5.1

Castro

E. L.

Brawn

(2017). Critiquing critical pedagogies inside the prison classroom: A dialogue between student and teacher. Harvard Educational Review, 87(1), 99–121.

Castro

E. L.

Royer

C. E.

Gould

M. R.

Lerman

A. E.

(2022). Beyond Pell restoration: Addressing persistent funding challenges in higher education in prison toward racial and economic justice. Alliance for Higher Education in Prison. https://www.higheredinprison.org/publications/beyond-pell-restoration

10.

Chesnut

Wachendorfer

(2021). Second Chance Pell: Four Years of Expanding Access to Education in Prison. https://www.vera.org/downloads/publications/second-chance-pell-four-years-of-expanding-access-to-education-in-prison.pdf

11.

Conway

P. F.

(2022). Andragogy in prison: Higher education in prison and the tenets of adult education. Adult Education Quarterly, 72(4), 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136221100481

12.

Conway

P. F.

(2023). ‘Education changes a person’: exploring student development in a college-in-prison program through critical andragogy. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–17.

13.

Deterding

N. M.

Waters

M. C.

(2021). Flexible coding of in-depth interviews: A twenty-first-century approach. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(2), 708–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799377

14.

Education Data Initiative (2022). Average cost per credit hour. https://educationdata.org/cost-of-a-college-class-or-credit-hour

15.

Jobs for the Future (2024) Preparing instructors to support students in prison: Recommendations from the formerly incarcerated college graduates network. https://info.jff.org/hubfs/240228_FICGN_Report_SS.pdf?hsCtaTracking=e606f976-e54f-442d-8f3c-f7ea92e405dd%7C8b503e68-dec5-4966-8c03-29e7bf2ba27c

16.

Locke

Feldman

Golden-Biddle

(2022). Coding practices and iterativity: Beyond templates for analyzing qualitative data. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 262–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120948600

17.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

(1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013005020

18.

National Education Association. (2022). State funding for higher education is still lagging. https://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/state-funding-higher-education-still-lagging#:~:text=Between%202020%20and%202021%2C%20state,was%20cut%20by%2047%20percent

19.

Olaghere

Kremer

K. P.

Fong

C. J.

(2021). Learning opportunities while incarcerated: Association of engagement in literacy and numeracy activities with literacy and numeracy skills. Adult Education Quarterly, 71(3), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713620988505

20.

Perrucci

C. C.

(2014, March). The good society: Core social values, social norms, and public policy. Sociological Forum, 29(1), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12078

21.

Ramdeholl

Gnanadass

Merriweather

St. Clair

(2023). Adult education as a human right/adult education for human rights. Adult Education Quarterly, 73(4), 343–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136231198375

22.

Ridgeway

C. L.

Fisk

S. R.

(2012). Class rules, status dynamics, and “gateway” interactions. In Fiske

S. T.

Markus

H. R.

(Eds.), Facing social class: How societal rank influences interaction (pp. 131–151). Russell Sage Foundation.

23.

Sawyer

Wagner

(2023). Mass incarceration: The whole pie 2023. Prison Policy Initiative. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/pie2023.html

24.

Scott-Clayton

(2017). Undergraduate financial aid in the United States. American Academy of Arts and Sciences. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/96076/FinancialAidUndergraduate.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

25.

U.S. Department of Education. (2016, June 24). 12,000 incarcerated students to enroll in postsecondary educational and training programs through Educa- tion Department's new Second Chance Pell Pilot Program [Press release]. https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/12000-incarcerated-students-enroll- postsecondary-educational-andtraining-programs-through-education- departments-new-second-chance-pell-pilotprogram

26.

U.S. Department of Education. (2021, July 30). U.S. Department of Education announces it will expand the Second Chance Pell experiment for the 2022-2023 award year [Press release]. https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/us-department-education-announces-it-will-expand-second-chance-pell-experiment-2022-2023-award-year

27.

U.S. Department of Education (2023). Education department unveils final rules to protect veterans and service members, improve college access for incarcerated individuals and improve oversight when colleges change owners. https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/education-department-unveils-final-rules-protect-veterans-and-service-members-improve-college-access-incarcerated-individuals-and-improve-oversight-when-colleges-change-owners

28.

Walsh

Delaney

(2020). First class: Starting a postsecondary education. (3), 366–389. Program in prison. Vera Institute of Justice. https://www.vera.org/downloads/publications/first-class-post-secondary-education-in-prison.pdf

29.

Warner

(2007). Against the narrowing of perspectives: How do we see learning, prisons and prisoners?. Journal of Correctional Education, 58(2), 170–183.

30.

Weaver

Rousseau

Napior

A. J.

(2020). Learning from teachers. Journal of Correctional Education, 71(1), 18–56.