Developing adults’ reflective thinking habits is an aim of adult education, but the best way to do it has been overlooked. Common strategies communicate the skills and knowledge needed to reflect while providing practice opportunities. Yet research indicates that reflective habits are comprised of not only skills and knowledge but also of attitudes toward reflection. This study investigated whether attitudinal change strategies in a reflective thinking workshop induced cognitive dissonance by helping adults appreciate reflection and calibrate their reflective behavior. Participants were randomly assigned to a skills-based or skills-based plus attitudinal change workshop. Pre-post measures of learners’ need for and engagement in reflection were taken. Multivariate analysis of covariance revealed that attitudinal change strategies induced dissonance by increasing the need for reflection while decreasing perceived engagement in reflection. Exclusively skills-based strategies failed to affect the need for reflection but increased perceived engagement in reflection, creating overconfidence. Implications for research and practice are offered.
AmbroseS. A.DipietroM.BridgesM. W.LovettM. C.NormanM. K. (2010). How learning works: 7 research-based principles for smart teaching. Jossey-Bass.
2.
AngusD. C.ChangC. C. H. (2021). Heterogeneity of treatment effect: Estimating how the effects of interventions vary across individuals. JAMA Guide to Statistics and Methods,326(22), 2312‐2313. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.20552
BagoB.RandD. G.PennycookG. (2020). Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,149(8), 1608‐1613. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000729
5.
BaileyD.DuncanG. J.OdgersC. L.YuW. (2017). Persistence and fadeout in the impacts of child and adolescence interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness,10(1), 7‐39. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2016.1232459
6.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D. (2007). Gain–loss framing. In Encyclopedia of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 371‐372). Sage Publications.
7.
BednarA.LevieW. H. (1993). Attitude-change principles. In FlemingM.LevieW.H. (Eds.), Instructional message design: Principles from the behavioral and cognitive sciences (pp. 283‐304). Educational Technology Publications.
8.
BodenhausenG. V.GawronskiB. (2013). Attitude change. In ReisbergD. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 957‐969). Oxford University Press.
9.
BouldinA. S. (2017). Reflection is not reflexive. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 81(9), 7-9. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6832
10.
BranchW. T.ParnjapeA. (2002). Feedback and reflection: Teaching methods for clinical settings. Academic Medicine, 77(12), 1185‐1188. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200212000-00005
11.
BrownP. C.RoedigerH. L.McDanielM. A. (2014). Make it stick: The science of successful learning. Belknap.
Cancino-MontecinosS.BjörklundF.LindholmT. (2018). Dissonance reduction as emotion regulation: Attitude change is related to positive emotions in the induced compliance paradigm. PLoS One, 13(12), e0209012. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209012
De BruinA. B. H.KokE.LobbestaelJ.De GripA. (2017). The impact of an online tool for monitoring and regulating learning at university: Overconfidence, learning strategy, and personality. Metacognition and Learning, 12(1), 21‐43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-016-9159-5
16.
DevineP. G.TauerJ. M.BarronK. E.ElliotA. J.VanceK. M. (1999). Moving beyond attitude change in the study of dissonance-related processes. In Harmon-JonesE.MillsJ. (eds) Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 297‐324). American Psychological Association.
DickW.CareyJ. O. (2015). Systematic design of instruction (8th ed.). Pearson.
19.
DwyerC. P.WalshA. (2020). An exploratory quantitative case study of critical thinking development through adult distance learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 17‐35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09659-2
20.
ElliotA. J.DevineP. G. (1994). On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,67(3), 382‐394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.382
21.
EvansJ. S. B. T. (2019). Reflections on reflection: The nature and function of type 2 processes in dual-process theories of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning,25(4), 383‐415. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2019.1623071
22.
FacioneP. A. (2000). The disposition toward critical thinking: Its character, measurement, and relationship to critical thinking skill. Informal Logic,20(1), 61‐84. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v20i1.2254
23.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
24.
FischerK. W.PruyneE. (2003). Reflective thinking in adulthood. In DemickJ.AndreolettiC. (Eds.), Handbook of adult development (pp. 169‐198). Springer.
GardnerW. L.AvolioB. J.LuthansF.MayD. R.WalumbwaF. (2005). Can you see the real me? A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 343‐372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.003
27.
GrantA. M.FranklinJ.LangfordP. (2002). The self-reflection and insight scale: A new measure of private self-consciousness. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal,30(8), 821‐835. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2002.30.8.821
Gutierrez de BlumeA. P. (2022). Calibrating calibration: A meta-analysis of learning strategy instruction interventions to improve metacognitive monitoring accuracy. Journal of Educational Psychology,114(4), 681‐700. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000674
31.
HarfordT. (2021). The data detective.Riverhead Books.
32.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford. HertzogC.SmithR. M.ArielR. (2018). Does the cognitive reflection test actually capture heuristic versus analytic reasoning styles in older adults?Experimental Aging Research,44(1), 18‐34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2017.1398508
33.
Hoggan-KloubertT.HogganC. (2022). Post-truth as an epistemic crisis: The need for rationality, autonomy, and pluralism. Adult Education Quarterly.Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136221080424
JordiR. (2011). Reframing the concept of reflection: Consciousness, experiential learning, and reflective learning practices. Adult Education Quarterly,61(2), 181‐197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713610380439
38.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
39.
KamradtT. F.KamradtE. J. (1999). Structured design for attitudinal instruction. In ReigeluthC.M. (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory: Vol.II. (pp. 563‐590). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishing.
40.
KangD. J. (2007). Rhizoactivity: Toward a postmodern theory of lifelong learning. Adult Education Quarterly,57(3), 205‐220. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136062974
41.
Kantorowicz-ReznichenkoE.FolmerC. R.KantrorowiczJ. (2022). Don't believe it! A global perspective on cognitive reflection and conspiracy theories about COVID-19 pandemic. Personality and Individual Differences,194, 1‐8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111666
42.
KeganR.LaheyL.L. (2010). From subject to object: A constructive-developmental approach to reflective practice. In LyonsN. (Ed.), Handbook of reflection and reflective inquiry (pp. 433‐449). Springer.
43.
KolbD. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson.
KrugerJ.DunningD. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,77(6), 1121‐1134. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1121
46.
LubianD.UntertrifallerA. (2013). Cognitive Ability, Stereotypes and Gender Segregation in the Workplace.Working Paper No. 25/2013. University of Verona. http://dse.univr.it/workingpapers/wp2013n25.pdf
47.
MartinieM-A.AlmecijaY.RosC.GilS. (2017). Incidental mood state before dissonance induction affects attitude change. PLoS One,12(7), e0180531. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180531
48.
MartocchioJ. J.JudgeT. A. (1997). Relationship between conscientiousness and learning in employee training: Mediating influences of self-deception and self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology,82(5), 764‐773. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.764
49.
McNamaraJ.FieldR. (2007). Designing reflective assessment for workplace learning in legal education. In SouthwellD. (Ed.), ATN Evaluation and assessment conference: Assessment and evaluation for real world learning (pp. 87‐93). https://eprints.qut.edu.au/12576/1/12576.pdf
50.
MichelsonE. (2019). The ethical knower: Rethinking our pedagogy in the age of Trump. Adult Education Quarterly, 69(2), 142‐156. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136198346
51.
MiddletonM.AbramsE.SeamanJ. (2010). Resistance and disidentification in reflective practice with preservice teaching interns. In New directions for teaching and learning (126, pp. 67‐75). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.445
52.
MikelsJ. A.ShusterM. M.ThaiS. T. (2015). Aging, emotion, and decision making. In HessT. M.StroughJ.LockenhoffC. E. (Eds.), Aging and decision making: Empirical and applied perspectives (pp. 169‐188). Academic Press.
53.
MillerT. M.GeraciL. (2011). Unskilled but aware: Reinterpreting overconfidence in low-performing students. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,37(2), 502‐506. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021802
54.
MoonJ. A. (1999). Reflection in learning and professional development: Theory and practice. Routledge.
55.
MoslehM.PennycookG.ArecharA. A.RandD. G. (2021). Cognitive reflection correlates with behavior on twitter. Nature Communications, 12, 921. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20043-0
56.
MuellerC.LimJ.WatsonS. L. (2017). First principles of attitudinal change: A review of principles, methods and strategies. TechTrends,61, 560‐569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0191-3
57.
NederhandM. L.TabbersH. K.De BruinA. B. H.RikersR. M. J. P. (2021). Metacognitive awareness as measured by second-order judgements among university and secondary school students. Metacognition and Learning,16, 1‐14.
58.
NederhandM. L.TabbersH. K.RikersR. M. J. P. (2019). Learning to calibrate: Providing standards to improve calibration accuracy for different performance levels. Applied Cognitive Psychology,33(6), 1068‐1079. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3548
59.
NitsunM. (2019). Resistance to reflective practice – an anti-group perspective. In NovakovicA.VincentD. (Eds.), Group analysis: Working with staff, teams and organizations (pp. 166‐182). Routledge.
60.
O'KeefeD. J.JensenJ. D. (2009). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication,59(2), 296‐316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01417.x
61.
PennycookG.RandD. G. (2019). Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: USA, 116(7), 2521‐2526. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806781116
62.
PennycookG.RossR.KoehlerD.FugelsangJ. (2017). Dunning-Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,24, 1774‐1784. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1242-7
63.
PetersE. (2010). Aging-related changes in decision making. In DroletA.SchwarzN.YoonC. (Eds.), The aging consumer: Perspectives from psychology and economics (pp. 75‐101). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
64.
PornpitakpanC. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
65.
PultorakE. G. (1996). Following the developmental process of reflection in novice teachers: Three years of investigation. Journal of Teacher Education,47(4), 283‐291. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871964740
66.
RobertsC.StarkP. (2008). Readiness for self-directed change in professional behaviours: Factorial validation of the self-reflection and insight scale. Medical Education,42(11), 1054‐1063. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03156.x
67.
RoessgerK. M. (2014). The effect of reflective activities on instrumental learning in adult work-related education: A critical review of the empirical research. Educational Research Review, 13, 17‐34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.002
68.
RoessgerK. M.RoumellE. A.WeeseJ. (2022). Rethinking andragogical assumptions in the global age: How preferences for andragogical learning vary across people and cultures. Studies in Continuing Education, 44(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2020.1732335
69.
SanchezC.DunningD. (2018). Overconfidence among beginners: Is a little learning a dangerous thing?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(1), 10‐28. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000102.supp
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professional think in action. Basic Books.
72.
SchönD. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.
73.
Seggelen-DamenI. V.DamK. V. (2016), Self-reflection as a mediator between self-efficacy and well-being. Journal of Managerial Psychology,31(1), 18‐33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-01-2013-0022
74.
SolandJ.ZamarroG.ChengA.HittC. (2019). Identifying naturally occurring direct assessments of social-emotional competencies: The promise and limitations of survey and assessment disengagement metadata. Educational Researcher,48(7), 466‐478. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X198613
75.
SpaldingE.WilsonA. (2002). Demystifying reflection: A study of pedagogical strategies that encourage reflective journal writing. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education,104(7), 1393‐1421. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.002
76.
StanovichK. E. (2011). Rationality and the reflective mind. Oxford.SticeE.YokumS.WatersA. (2015). Dissonance-based eating disorder prevention program reduces reward region response to thin models; how actions shape valuation. PLoS One,10(12), e0144530. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144530. Free PMC article
77.
StevensJ. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). New York: Routledge.
78.
SzasziB.AczelB.SzollosiA.PalfiB. (2017). The cognitive reflection test revisited: Exploring the ways individuals solve the test. Thinking and Reasoning,23(3), 1‐28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2017.1292954
79.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
80.
TaylorP. J.Russ-EftD. F.ChanD. W. L. (2005). A meta-analytic review of behavior modeling training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 692–709. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.692
81.
ThomsonK. S.OppenheimerD. M. (2016). Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test. Judgment and Decision Making,11(1), 99‐113. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500007622
82.
ToplakM. E.WestR. F.StanovichK. E. (2014). Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the cognitive reflection test. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 147‐168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.844729
83.
TymulaA.Rosenberg-BelmakerL. A.RudermanL.GlimcherP. W.LevyI. (2013). Like cognitive function, decision making across the life span shows profound age-related changes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,110(42), 17143‐17148. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1309909110
84.
VisserP. S.CooperJ. (2007). Attitude change. In VisserP.Cooper’sJ. (Eds.), Attitude change (pp. 197‐218). SageWatsonW. R.KimW.WatsonS. L. (2016). Learning outcomes of a MOOC designed for attitudinal change: A case study of an animal behavior and welfare MOOC. Computers & Education, 96, 83‐93.
85.
WestrateN. M. (2019). Self-reflection as a developmental precursor and core competency of wise people. In SternbergR. J.GluckJ. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 500‐518).
86.
ZakirovF.KrasilnikovA. (2020). Age-related differences in decision-making process in the context of healthy aging. BIO Web of Conferences, 22, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20202201022
