This research synthesis analyzed qualitative depictions of adult literacy learners and identified five ways in which they are typically characterized: the Heroic Victim, the Needy (Problem) Child, the Broken (but Repairable) Cog, the Pawn of Destiny, and the Capable Comrade. These types do not capture the diversity or complexity of all adult literacy learners, and we do not argue that they are comprehensive. Rather they are representative of the ways in which adult literacy learners are portrayed in the research literature. We argue that each type, like characters in a narrative, drive the “action” in research, policy, and practice arena. The ways in which they populate research may have very real consequences for how adult literacy learning opportunities are provided and the outcomes that can be expected.
AlampreseJ. A.MacArthurC. A.PriceC.KnightD. (2011). Effects of a structured decoding curriculum on adult literacy learners’ reading development. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4, 154-172.
2.
BartonD. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
3.
BederH. (2006). Shaping and sustaining learner engagement in individualized group instruction classrooms. Focus on Basics, 8(B), 6-9.
4.
BelzerA. (2002). “I don’t crave to read”: School literacy in adulthood. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 46, 104-113.
5.
BingmanM. B.EbertO. (2000). “I’ve come a long way”: Learner-identified outcomes of participation in adult literacy programs. Cambridge, MA: National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy, Harvard Graduate School of Education.
6.
BridwellS. D. (2013). A constructive-developmental perspective on the transformative learning of adults marginalized by race, class, and gender. Adult Education Quarterly, 63(2), 127-146.
7.
BrunerJ. (1991). Narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18, 1-21.
8.
CampagnaS. (2005). Sustained silent reading: A useful model. Focus on Basics, 7(C), 8-10.
9.
ChristophJ. N. (2009). Each one teach one: The legacy of evangelism in adult literacy education. Written Communication, 26, 77-110.
10.
CoffeyA.AtkinsonP. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
ComingsJ. P.CubanS.BosJ. M.TaylorC. J., National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy, & Manpower Demonstration Resource Corporation. (2001). “I did it for myself”: Studying efforts to increase adult student persistence in library literacy programs. New York, NY. Retrieved from http://www.mdrc.org/sites/default/files/full_1.pdf
12.
ComingsJ. P.ParrellaA.SoriconeL. (1999). Persistence among adult basic education students in pre-GED classes. Cambridge, MA: National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy, Harvard Graduate School of Education.
13.
Compton-LillyC. (2009). Disparate reading identities of adult students in one GED program. Adult Basic Education and Literacy Journal, 3(1), 34-43.
14.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
CubanS. (2001). Reading for pleasure: Learners’ personal reading choices can provide teachers with ideas on how to motivate and support them. Focus on Basics, 5(A), 20-23.
16.
CubanS. (2003). “So lucky to be like that, somebody care”: Two case studies of women learners and their persistence in a Hawai’i literacy program. Adult Basic Education, 13(1), 19-43.
17.
D’AmicoD. (2004). Race, class, gender, and sexual orientation in adult literacy: Power, pedagogy, and programs. In ComingJ.GarnerB.SmithC. (Eds.), Review of adult learning and literacy (Vol. 4, pp. 17-69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Dann-MessierB.KampitsE. I. (2004). Community-based programs play a role in introducing learners to college and in helping them persist. Focus on Basics, 6(D), 22-25.
19.
DefoeT.FolinsbeeS. (2004). Literacies in the new workplace: Reading work. Focus on Basics, 7(B), 13-16.
20.
DeJesusA. (2008). Numeracy at the downtown learning center. Focus on Basics, 9(A), 29-34.
21.
DeutschN. L. (2004). Positionality and the pen: Reflections on the process of becoming a feminist researcher and writer. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 885-902.
FingeretA. (1983). Social network: A new perspective on independence and illiterate adults. Adult Education Quarterly, 33, 133-146.
24.
FingeretA. (1989). The social and historical context of participatory literacy education. New Directions for Continuing Education, 42, 5-15.
25.
FlynnB. (2005). Writing at the house: Bunker Hill Community College’s Offender Re-Entry Program at the Suffolk County House of Correction. Focus on Basics, 7(D), 1, 3-6.
26.
ForsterE. M. (1927). Aspects of the novel. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
27.
FreedmanA. M.MinerK. R.EchtK. V.ParkerR.CooperH. L. F. (2011). Amplifying diffusion of health information in low-literate populations through adult education health literacy classes. Journal of Health Communication, 16(Suppl. 3), 119-133.
28.
FriesenH. L. (2011). Spelling lessons: A step toward recuperation from educational distress. Adult Basic Education and Literacy Journal, 5, 103-106.
29.
GarnerB., & National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy. (2008). Conversation with focus on basics: Is math universal?Focus on Basics, 9(A), 26-29.
30.
GillespieM. K. (2001). Research in writing: Implications for adult literacy education. In ComingJ.GarnerB.SmithC. (Eds.), Annual review of adult learning and literacy (Vol. 2, pp. 63-110). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from http://www.ncsall.net/index.html@id=561.html
31.
GowenS. G. (1992). The politics of workplace literacy: A case study. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
32.
GreenbergD.WiseJ. C.MorrisR.FredrickL.NandaA. O.PaeH. K. (2011). A randomized control study of instructional approaches for struggling adult readers. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4, 101-117.
33.
HanstockR. (2004). Self-directed informal learning: A case study. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 44(1), 72-83.
34.
HelsingD.Drago-SeversonE.KeganR. (2004). Applying constructive-developmental theories of adult development to ABE and ESOL practices. In ComingJ.GarnerB.SmithC. (Eds.), Review of adult learning and literacy (Vol. 4, pp. 157-197). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Retrieved from http://www.ncsall.net/fileadmin/resources/ann_rev/rall_v4_ch5.pdf
35.
HockM. F.MellardD. F. (2011). Efficacy of learning strategies instruction in adult education. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4, 134-153.
36.
HorsmanJ. (1990). Something in my mind besides the everyday. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: The Woman’s Press.
37.
IlsleyP. J.StahlN. A. (1994). Reconceptualizing the language of adult literacy. In RadencichJ. C. (Ed.), Adult literacy: A compendium of articles from the journal of reading (pp. 4-12). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
38.
JacksonC. (2004). Education leads to investments. Focus on Basics, 7(B), 27-29.
39.
KnowlesM. S.HoltonE. F.SwansonR. A. (1998). The adult learner. Woburn, MA: Betterworth-Heinemann.
KruidenierJ. R.MacArthurC. A.WrigleyH. S. (2010). Adult education literacy instruction: A review of the research. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
42.
KutnerM.GreenbergE.BaerJ. (2005). A first look at the literacy of American’s adults in the 21st century (NCES 2006-470). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
43.
LesgoldA. M.Welch-RossM. (Eds.). (2012). Improving adult literacy instruction: Options for practice and research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
44.
MajorC. H.Savin-BadenM. (2010). An introduction to qualitative research synthesis: Managing the information explosion in social science research. London, England: Routledge.
45.
MerriamS.CaffarellaR.BaumgartnerL. (2006). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
46.
MilnerR. (2007). Race, culture and researcher positionality: Working through dangers seen, unseen, and unforseen. Educational Researcher, 36, 388-400.
47.
MurrA. (2001). Theory to practice, practice to theory: A tutor-based program goes through multiple changes to serve its first-level learners better. Focus on Basics, 5(A), 24-27.
48.
NormanD. A. (2014). Some observations on mental models. In GentnerD.StevensA. L. (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 7-14). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
OughtonH. (2012). Conformative and disruptive contributions in skills for life classrooms. Studies in the Education of Adults, 44, 204-224.
51.
PorterK. E.CubanS.ComingsJ. P., & Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation. (2005). “One day I will make it”: A study of adult student persistence in library literacy programs. New York, NY: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED484618.pdf
52.
ProppV. (1968). Morphology of the folktale (ScottL., Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
53.
QuigleyB. A. (1997). Rethinking literacy education: The critical need for practice-based change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
54.
RederS.StrawnC. (2006). Self-study: Broadening the concepts of participation and program support. Focus on Basics, 8(C), 6-10.
55.
RidgewayL.GriffithD. (2002). Struggles: Writing as healing. Focus on Basics, 5(C), 11-14.
56.
RobertsonL. (2007). An adult education teacher’s journey. Adult Basic Education and Literacy Journal, 1, 157-160.
57.
RoeE. (1994). Narrative policy analysis: Theory and practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
58.
RogersR. (2004). Storied selves: A critical discourse analysis of adult learners’ literate lives. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 272-305.
59.
SabatiniJ. P.ShoreJ.HoltzmanS.ScarboroughH. S. (2011). Relative effectiveness of reading intervention programs for adults with low literacy. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4, 118-133.
60.
SandelowskiM.BarrosoJ. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York, NY: Springer.
61.
SandlinJ. A.ClarkM. C. (2009). From opportunity to responsibility: Political master narratives, social policy, and success stories in adult literacy education. Teachers College Record, 111, 999-1029.
62.
SantosR. A.AlfredM. V. (2011). Adults’ dual roles as student and teacher in the literacy development of their children. Adult Basic Education and Literacy Journal, 5, 141-149.
63.
SchafftK. A.PrinsE. S. (2009). Poverty, residential mobility, and persistence across urban and rural family literacy programs in Pennsylvania. Adult Basic Education and Literacy Journal, 3, 3-12.
64.
SchoneckL. M. (2006). Distance learning as a backup: A community college’s distance learning program also serves those who would otherwise stop out. Focus on Basics, 8(C), 11-12.
65.
SiedowM. (2005). One-on-one tutoring. Focus on Basics, 7(C), 32-35.
66.
SnowC.StruckerJ. (2000). Lessons from preventing reading difficulties in young children for adult learning and literacy. In ComingJ.GarnerB.SmithC. (Eds.), Review of adult learning and literacy (Vol. 1, pp. 25-73). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69.
StreetB. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. London, England: Cambridge University Press.
70.
StruckerJ. (2006). More curriculum structure: A response to “turbulence.”Focus on Basics, 8(C), 1-6.
71.
ThieleL. P. (2009). The ontology of action: Arendt and the role of narrative. Theory & Event, 12(4). doi: 10.1353/tae.0.0101
72.
TosoB. W.PrinsE.DraytonB.GnanadassE.GungorR. (2009). Finding voice: Shared decision making and student leadership in a family literacy program. Adult Basic Education and Literacy Journal, 3, 151-160.
73.
U.S. Department of Education Division of Adult Education and Literacy. (2011). Adult Education and Family Literacy Act of 1998 annual report to Congress 2006-2007. Washington, DC: Author.
WilsonB.MoralesR. (2008). Arizona’s professional learning journey through the Teachers Investigating Adult Numeracy Project. Focus on Basics, 9(A), 44-48.
76.
ZacharakisJ.SteichenM.de SabatesG. D.GlassD. (2011). Understanding the experiences of adult learners: Content analysis of focus group data. Adult Basic Education and Literacy Journal, 5, 84-95.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
