Based on a sociocultural approach to adult learning and poststructural feminist theories, this study draws on interviews with 11 married Vietnamese women to explore the higher education learning experiences of Vietnamese immigrant women in Taiwan. On the basis of their husbands’ permission and support, Vietnamese immigrant women embraced the instrumental value of education and pursued higher education to play their expected motherhood roles. During the higher education learning process, the women persevered in learning with resilience, negotiated their voices and cultural identity, and fulfilled multiple roles. Participating in and even completing higher education in Taiwan empowered these women through learning based on their bicultural competence.
AlfredM. (2001). Expending theories of career development: Adding voices of African American women in the white academy. Adult Education Quarterly, 51, 108-127.
2.
AlfredM. (2003). Sociocultural contexts and learning: Anglophones Caribbean immigrant women in U. S. postsecondary education. Adult Education Quarterly, 53, 242-260. doi:10.1177/0741713603254028
3.
CaffarellaR.MerriamS. B. (2000). Linking the individual learner to the context of adult learning. In WilsonA. L.HayesE. R. (Eds.), Handbook of adult and continuing education (pp. 55-70). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
CubanS. (2013). Deskilling migrant women in the global care industry. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
5.
CubanS.StromquistN. P. (2009). It is difficult to be a woman with an education: Challenging U.S. adult basic education policies to support women immigrants’ self-determination. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 7, 155-186.
6.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
EdwardsR. (1993). Mature women students: Separating or connecting family and education. London, England: Taylor & Francis.
8.
FlanneryD. (2000). Identity and self-esteem. In HayesE.FlanneryD. (Eds.), Women as learners (pp. 53-78). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9.
FlanneryD. D.HayesE. (2000). Women’s learning: A kaleidoscope. In BrooksA. K.TisdellE. J.HugoJ. M. (Eds.), Women as learners: The significance of gender in adult learning (pp. 1-22). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
GaveyN. (1989). Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 459-475.
11.
GraceA. P.GouthroP. A. (2000). Using models of feminist pedagogies to think about issues and directions in graduate education for women studies. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(1), 5-28.
12.
HayesE. (2000). Voice. In BrooksA. K.TisdellE. J.HugoJ. M. (Eds.), Women as learners: The significance of gender in adult learning (pp. 70-110). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
hooksb. (1990). Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics. Boston, MA: South End Press.
14.
John-SteinerV.MahnH. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31, 191-206.
15.
KuoW. H.TsaiY. M. (1986). Social networking, hardiness and immigrant’s mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 27, 133-149.
16.
McAfeeM. (2000). From their voices: American Indians in higher education and the phenomena of stepping out. Making Strides, 2(2), 7-11.
17.
McfarlaneT. A. (2006). The intersection of race, gender, and class in social transitions: Caribbean immigrant women negotiating US higher education (Unpublished doctoral thesis). The City University of New York.
18.
MenjivarC.SalcidoO. (2002). Immigrant women and domestic violence: Common experiences in different countries. Gender and Society, 16, 898-920.
19.
MerriamS. B.CaffarellaR.BaumgartnerL. M. (2007). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
PalriwalaR.UberoiP. (2008). Marriage, migration, and gender. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
RogoffB. (1995). Observing socio-cultural activity in three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In WertschJ. V.del RioP.AlvarezA. (Eds.), Socio-cultural studies of the mind (pp. 139-164). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
25.
SadeghiS. (2008). Gender, culture and learning: Iran immigrant women in Canadian higher education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 27, 217-234. doi:10.1080/02601370801936382
26.
SwaminathanR. (2004). Relational worlds: South Asian immigrant women talk about home/work. In AlfredM. V.SwaminathanR. (Eds.), Immigrant women of the academy (pp. 89-104). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
27.
TangA. W.WangH. (2011). From victims of domestic violence to determined independent women: How Vietnamese immigrant spouses negotiate Taiwan’s patriarchy family system. Women’s Studies International Journal Forum, 34, 430-440. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2011.06.005
28.
TisdellE. J. (1998). Poststructural feminist pedagogies: The possibilities and limitations of feminist emancipatory adult learning theory and practice. Adult Education Quarterly, 48, 139-156.
29.
TsaiT.-I.ChenI.-J.HuangS.-L. (2011). Motherhood journey through the eyes of immigrant women. Women’s Studies International Forum, 34, 91-100. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2010.12.002
30.
WeedonC. (1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.
31.
WongP.DuffP.EarlyM. (2001). The impact of language and skill training on immigrants’ lives. TESL Canada Journal, 18(2), 1-31.
32.
XuS.ConnellyF. M. (2009). Narrative inquiry for teacher education and development: Focus on English as a foreign language in China. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 219-227.
